troy fairweather
Member
Plus it was like shooting fish in a barrel.That's impressive, but a high number of kills by a great sniper doesn't automatically mean that the gun he used was the best of its type.
Plus it was like shooting fish in a barrel.That's impressive, but a high number of kills by a great sniper doesn't automatically mean that the gun he used was the best of its type.
Wanna give us some reasons why? The 98 was overly complicated, compared to most, more expensive to make, no more rugged or accurate than many others. It was not the most powerful. The fact that it may have been "prettier" than the rest is irrelevant. I would take my type 99, or an 03A3 Springfield, over any 98 Mauser.
What exactly was overly complicated? The bolt is easily stripped and the G98 served in the muddy trenches at Verdun and the K98k has worked in Russia as well as in Northern Africa and everywhere in between.
More expensive to manufacture is no disqualifier and the Mauser 98 action has been used in more hunting rifle designs than all other WWII bolt action together. The Anschutz 54 Match bolt is actually a reduced size Mauser bolt adapted for sporter use by W. Gehmann, the Brno CZ tgf/CZ1, Suhl 150 and Walther KKM were also all developed out of a reduced size Mauser action.
Because a crude finish equals a rough finish which equals friction and drag. Your mileage may vary, but I have never found a Type 99 as easy to work as a Springfield Krag, or even a German made Mauser, they feel "sticky".OK, I'm scratching my head on this one. I have a substitute standard ( improperly called a "last ditch" ) type 99. It's about as cobby as they come but it is quite accurate and functions smoothly. I can't tell the difference from my 98 Mauser, insofar as feeding and ejecting rounds is concerned. Exactly how does a crude finish obstruct functionality?
That's impressive, but a high number of kills by a great sniper doesn't automatically mean that the gun he used was the best of its type.
It has many more parts than a MAS 36 of a type 99. That's more parts to make. A type 99 bolt has exactly six parts. The firing pin, mainspring, the bolt body itself, the extractor, the extractor collar and the safety. A MAS36 has one less than that.What exactly was overly complicated?
Can you do it in two seconds of less? You can with a 99...quite literally.The bolt is easily stripped
Every gun in this thread has done the same.the G98 served in the muddy trenches at Verdun and the K98k has worked in Russia as well as in Northern Africa and everywhere in between.
True, but it does become an issue if your side is loosing the war.More expensive to manufacture is no disqualifier
True, but that is utterly irrelevant as pertaining to to which gun is the best bolt action military rifle.the Mauser 98 action has been used in more hunting rifle designs than all other WWII bolt action together. The Anschutz 54 Match bolt is actually a reduced size Mauser bolt adapted for sporter use by W. Gehmann, the Brno CZ tgf/CZ1, Suhl 150 and Walther KKM were also all developed out of a reduced size Mauser action.
A good point, but I will lay wager that you prefer a "cock on opening" action. My substitute standard 99's bolt will chamber a round from a full magazine if you hold the rifle vertically 1" above the floor and drop it. Same as my 98 Mauser.Because a crude finish equals a rough finish which equals friction and drag. Your mileage may vary, but I have never found a Type 99 as easy to work as a Springfield Krag, or even a German made Mauser, they feel "sticky".
Would that be a nickel steel 1903?they feel "sticky".
One old war horse that I have been searching for is the Arisaka Type 38 in 7mm Mauser.
About 40,000 were made.
About 5,000 were delivered to Mexico in 1913 and most were apparently handed off to folks that wanted to take over the borderlands in the Plan de San Diego. This fell through when WWI started.
The rest went to Russia,
I
Every gun in this thread has done the same.
Well, I guess you got what you asked for in the opening post......This should start a good brawl.