Falconeer
Member
There were a couple of references earlier in the topic pointing to tube detonation stories. As I said, it's certainly not something that seems to happens all that often. As for the difference between the tube and the strip, I'm not familiar with the strip. That being said, I could see where in a tube situation the force of a primer going off is going to propogate over the path of least resistance; ie the anvil into the strike surface of the primer above it. I believe on the strips the anvil/open side of the primer all face the same direction. Therefore a detonating primer wouldn't be pointing directly at the next primer in the chain. Again, this is pure theory but seems to make sense to me.Deavis said:I don't agree with that statement at all. The design has some marginal amount of risk involved, but that is inherent in every single system that is designed to work with a dangerous variable. For instance, people that claim a detonated primer could set off a chain reaction of primers in the disk of a Dillon, which would ignite the magazine. How is that any different from that same (extremely unlikely and almost impossible from my POV) chain reaction propogating down an APS strip? It is the "same" configuration, so would you rather have 25 primers "blowing" up in an APS strip or a well built magazine? Once again, you are talking about a risk that is so incredibly low that it makes no logical sense to consider it.
In regards to the Lee 'not being as well built as the other 3', I haven't heard any stories of people wearing out Lee presses. I'll certainly agree that the other presses are much 'beefier', but I suspect that it's more along the lines of overengineered. With that being said, my next press will probably be the one I stick with for a long time. I haven't read the links you've pointed out (going there next), but I certainly want to know if Lee presses wear out quicker than others.Deavis said:I'll be honest with you, having used two of the presses you are considering, examining the LEE at a gun show, and reading quite a bit from a THR member (Cortland has a great write-up) on the LNL, it is my opinion that you could be better served by the Dillon or LNL. It depends on how much you load. Some people swear by Lee but you get what you pay for. It is not as well built as the other 3, anyone that has ever tried a Lee and then tried one of the other three can testify to that fact. There is no disputing that fact, regardless of how much someone likes their Lee press. The RCBS is an incredibly solid press and built like a rock with a great motion. The Dillon is not as bulky as the PRo2000, but still rock solid.
I have done some searching, but I was hoping to take this topic in a specific 357 Sig direction. It's gone a bit afield from that but I still think the info is valid. I'm going to read the topics you suggested next.Deavis said:Since nobody else has bothered to recommend the search feature to you, I am going to. This subject has been covered many many times before. Here are a few links that have covered the LNL v. Dillon v. RCBS v, Lee debate...
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=131801&highlight=Dillon+650XL
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=132404&highlight=Dillon+650XL
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=112242&highlight=Dillon+650XL
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=171061&highlight=press+buy+progressive
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=161505&highlight=press+buy+progressive
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=132404&highlight=press+buy+progressive
Take saome time to read those threads, there is quite a bit of information in them that might steer you another way.