Best Scope for the money

Status
Not open for further replies.

Big Boomer

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
1,052
Location
Texas
considering a few different manufacturers but don't know where to start, looking for:

1. varmint high power scope
2. Deer/elk/etc scope
3. pistol scopes possible long range

looking for something that will hold up to heavy recoil from 460's 500's etc. the varmint one obviously not.

what price range am I looking in? Should I get a range finder thingy built in? I am TOTALLY scope ignorant and thought that I would throw out a post to get me in the right direction.

Thanks!

I'm cheap...I'd rather buy a new gun than an expensive scope :)
 
For a general hunting rifle, I'd go with a 3-9x40 or 2-7x35 variable scope. I don't hunt varmints or use scopes on handguns, but the following recommendations apply to scopes generally.

Things to avoid:
Cheap scopes - Optics is one of those areas where you generally get what you pay for. A cheap scope might work, or it might not. It might hold up to a gazillion rounds of .577 Tyrannosaur, or it might break after 10 rounds of .22lr. It will definitely NOT be as clear as a good scope, and you will be a lot less likely to see that trophy elk at dusk through a cheap scope.
Doodads & Gizmos - You do not need target turrets, mil-dot reticles, 30mm scope tubes, illuminated reticles, adjustable objectives, or "tactical" anything, unless you absolutely know without a doubt that you want/need it for the type of shooting you are going to do and will use it. A lot of people pay a lot extra for these doodads and never get any real use out of them.
Over-scoping - Many people seem to think strapping an astronomical observatory to their rifle is the way to go, but a $300 plain-vanilla 3-9x40 scope will have better optical quality and better resolution than a $300 scope with higher magnification. It will be a LOT better than a $300 scope with high magnification and assorted doodads. Also, heat wave distortion can be an issue with higher magnifications. A clear, bright, sharp image at 9x beats a dim, hazy image at 16x any day.

You say you are "cheap". Me too. But I've learned the hard way that cheap scopes are expensive. You will end up with a box of "cheap" scopes that cost more altogether than a good scope would have, or the cost may be an unsuccessful hunt, or simply lots of frustration with wandering zeros, erratic adjustments, etc. The cheapest scope I would even consider buying is the Bushnell Trophy for about $90. IMHO, it is the best of the cheap scopes. If you can't bring yourself to spend $90 on a scope, you are better served with iron sights.

For a good scope on a budget, you can't beat the Burris Fullfield II. You can get one for $150 to $175 if you shop around. This is the scope I put on my daughter's deer rifle when I wanted a good scope that would enable her to enjoy hunting but wouldn't break the bank in case she decided hunting wasn't her thing.

If you want to step up a notch, the Nikon Monarch, Weaver Grand Slam, Leupold VX II or the Bushnell Elite 4200 scopes are all good choices and should be around $300. My personal choice in this range would be the Bushnell Elite 4200.

If you can afford a bit more ($400), the Zeiss Conquest is a superb scope with outstanding clarity and resolution. You would have to pay almost twice as much to find a scope with better optical quality. This is what I have on my deer rifle. It is the best scope I have ever owned, and unless I suddenly become rich enough to afford a Schmidt & Bender or Zeiss Diavari costing $1300+, I doubt I will ever feel the need to upgrade.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top