Biased newspaper Editorial - Reading Eagle - Reading,PA

Status
Not open for further replies.

SJG26

member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
445
Location
Eastern PA - Berks/Lehigh Valley
ADMINS - please post to NEWS section if worthy.

Background - a police officer was tragically gunned down this week in Reading, but - that does not justify this editorial---please educate the Eagle editors appropriately(NOTE BOLD SECTIONS):

http://www.readingeagle.com/blog/editorials/archives/2006/08/action_needed_n_1.html#more

Action needed now to stop gun violence
The Issue: Reading Patrolman Scott A. Wertz is murdered in the line of duty.

Our Opinion: Handguns must be taken off the streets.


Enough! We’ve lived with senseless deaths; the deaths of innocents; the deaths of malcontents and lowlifes; we’ve lived and continue to live, lamenting the cold steel that has rendered our city impotent.

It’s enough!

We need to make our legislators and officials act now!

Philadelphia has become a morgue, a killing field that rips children and innocents from life.

Reading has become, with the murder of Patrolman Scott A. Wertz, a symbol of total disregard for law and humanity.

Handguns have no conscience; they have no remorse; they only function as a way to deal pain and death; they are useless tools of civilization. They need to be put in a cave along with the scribblings of the Cro-Magnon; They need to be relegated to the darkest corners of our world.

This is by no means a call to repeal the Second Amendment. Rifles and shotguns have an honored place in the history of this country. But handguns have become a cancer that must be eradicated, and the Second Amendment should not be used as an excuse to ignore what has become a national disgrace.

Mayors of cities considered to be much safer than Reading have mounted aggressive campaigns against the illegal use of handguns. Reading should do likewise.

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, frustrated by the ease with which criminals can obtain guns, filed a federal lawsuit earlier this year against 15 gun shops in five states whom he has accused of knowingly selling guns to individuals who were buying them for others. One of those shops is in Berks County.

People who can’t buy guns legally often use individuals who do not have criminal records to make the purchases.

According to the lawsuit, hundreds of guns that can be traced to the shops were seized in New York City between 1994 and 2001.

There probably are more, but because of a measure called the Tiahrt amendment, added to a law passed by Congress in 2001, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms is prohibited from providing state and local law-enforcement personnel with data on the origins of illegal guns.

Bloomberg has launched a campaign to have the Taihrt amendment overturned.

However, the powerful gun lobby is in the process of pressuring Congress to make it a criminal offense for law-enforcement officials with different departments to share gun-tracing information with each other.

How any organization, in good conscience, can suggest legislation than would be such a boon to criminals is unfathomable.

Even before the wave of violence that has enveloped Philadelphia this year, Mayor John Street had been insisting that something needed to be done to curb the illegal use of handguns.

“The proliferation of guns is completely and totally out of control,” Street said earlier this year as law-enforcement officers displayed 1,500 guns they had taken off of the streets in the first few months of the year.

There have been calls by Street, Bloomberg and other mayors for better cooperation from state and federal lawmakers, but so far there seems to be little political will to do anything to stem the tide of bloodshed.

Because Congress doesn’t seem to be doing anything to crub handgun violence, 15 states have enacted laws allowing crime victims to use deadly force without fear of being prosecuated for murder.

This is not the answer. we need less gun violence; not more.

We call on all lawmakers at all levels of government to do what’s right. Get handguns off the streets. Innocent lives are at stake.


send your comments here:
[email protected]
 
Even before the wave of violence that has enveloped Philadelphia this year, Mayor John Street had been insisting that something needed to be done to curb the illegal use of handguns.

How about locking up violent offenders and throwing away the keys?
 
Because Congress doesn’t seem to be doing anything to crub handgun violence, 15 states have enacted laws allowing crime victims to use deadly force without fear of being prosecuated for murder.

This is not the answer. we need less gun violence; not more.

That's the problem with the gun control crowd; they see no moral distinction between using force to defend oneself or ones family and using force to commit criminal acts. For them, all violence is bad.:banghead:
 
How about we start by banning all articles and editorials not approved by the Bush administration? This is by no means a call to repeal the First Amendment. Current administration press releases have an honored place in history. But unlicensed writers have become a cancer that must be eradicated. The First Amendment should not be used as an excuse to ignore what has become an national disgrace: the michael moores, dan rathers, jayson blairs, and adnan hajj's of so-called 'news organizations'.
 
How about we start by banning all articles and editorials not approved by the Bush administration?

I don't believe we can do that. THEY have been trying to do that now for 6 years and haven't quite succeeded yet. They simply call them traitors.

I agree with ilbob. Lock their asses up and the problem is solved.
 
Well...

...if they don't like Philly, they can always move to Houston.

We've managed to get our rate of shootings down to a moderate 3-4 a day :evil: . As well, our CHL classes are overflowing.

Damn! Someday's I think Baghdad is safer!
 
tool?

Let's see now. I have a Colt Officer's Match single action revolver. This revolver is designed for one purpose and one purpose only, to make holes in a piece of paper at a certain measured distance. In other words it's an elaborate paper punch, not a weapon.

But you say, it's ridiculaously elaborate for a paper punch. Well the three hole punch here at work probably cost four or five times what the Colt did.

But, you say, it can be used to injure people. Well let me hold your hand under the three hole paper punch while I bring it down. No yelling now, it's not a revolver so it can't possibly hurt! No, wait! I forgot, since it makes three holes at once it must be one of those awful automatic assault weapons.

There is obviously only one course of sensible action! BAN PAPER PUNCHES!
 
I posted a comment there, but comments are subject to editorial review. We'll see if they have any integrity.
 
We've managed to get our rate of shootings down to a moderate 3-4 a day . As well, our CHL classes are overflowing.

The violent crime rate in Houston had been going down until chocolate city donated their garbage to H-town. Then homicides shot up 25% overnight.
 
Action needed now to stop gun violence

How about instilling a healthy work ethic, respect for life and mankind, a solid value system and some sense of integrity into the mutant lifeforms perpetrating this so-called "gun violence" before they get to the point of making the bad choices they make?? This cultural breakdown seems to be the white elephant in the room that none of these gun-fearing propagandists acknowledge. I guess it's yet another symptom of the "instant gratification" society we find ourselves in these days; these people think that "getting rid" of the guns would automatically bring about the terrestrial utopia they so desire, whereas a re-working of the way parents are raising their kids would take some time to bear fruit, and they'll go for what they perceive to be the "quick and easy" solution, even though the solution that took longer would bear more and better fruit. In any event, though, this tripe has gotten old and it stinks. And this editorial is nothing more than just another swirl around the toilet.
 
They all need to go to an AA meeting.

I'm serious. Go to one. I'm not a drinker, and haven't ever been, but I drive a buddy to AA every Sunday.
Know what's great about AA? THEY DON'T BLAME THE BOOZE! They don't blame booze, bartenders, the entire alcohol industry is totally safe from these people. They don't want to take your booze away. They don't want to change the drinking age, or impose any new laws about drinking.
Alcohol is linked to more deaths per year than guns. Alcohol is more likely to fall into the hands of minors. Blah, Blah, Blah.
Now, do you see the difference? Ever hear someone who lost a family member to a drunk driver calling to abolish wine? To eradicate the cancer that tequila is? To end the horror caused by Guinnes?
 
How about we start by banning all articles and editorials not approved by the Bush administration? This is by no means a call to repeal the First Amendment. Current administration press releases have an honored place in history. But unlicensed writers have become a cancer that must be eradicated. The First Amendment should not be used as an excuse to ignore what has become an national disgrace: the michael moores, dan rathers, jayson blairs, and adnan hajj's of so-called 'news organizations'.

Orangelo,

That was very nicely put.
;)
 
Handguns have no conscience; they have no remorse; they only function as a way to deal pain and death; they are useless tools of civilization. They need to be put in a cave along with the scribblings of the Cro-Magnon; They need to be relegated to the darkest corners of our world.
So by this logic, we should start by taking all handguns away from the police, since those are under our control. :rolleyes:
 
I posted a comment there, but comments are subject to editorial review. We'll see if they have any integrity.

I wouldn't stand on one foot waiting for any integrity of any sort from these people. I write that as a resident of the same area SJG 26 comes from. We are as close to being neighbors as one can be given his locale. I have written the editors of this paper in the past. They are snide and arrogant over the phone when someone conservative calls to ask why the letters to the editor run 20-1 against conservative positions.

Reading used to be a beautiful city, mostly PA German in background. Now a different group has moved in and it is not safe to be in city even in broad daylight. Back in 1999 I was standing on the steps of the library watching two "gentlemen" who had expressed an interest in my truck to see if they were going to go any further than stare in the windows. When they caught me watching, they walked away, and one of them screamed at me from over 100 ft away, "I'll kill you and then I'll take it!" He did not choose to come across the street to fulfill his threat though. This is a crowded street in the middle of the day!

It is not guns, it is the evil hearts of men that are the problem. If they take away the guns, people will still kill other people with knives, rocks, clubs, or bare hands if need be.:fire:
 
They've posted the comments that were queued for review. I'll give them credit where credit is due. My comment was not altered in any way, and not a single comment supported the editorial.
 
They've posted the comments that were queued for review. I'll give them credit where credit is due. My comment was not altered in any way, and not a single comment supported the editorial.

Well I stand corrected - shocked, but gladly corrected. I would not have expected it based on their previous behavior. Maybe someone new is in charge there now.

I live about half an hour outside of Reading. One of their fine citizens threatened to kill me and steal my truck a number of years ago, screaming at me from over 100 ft away on a crowded city street. I was standing on the library steps watching to see if he and his friend were going to attempt to do anything to my truck, since they made no secret of looking in the windows while I was standing there! :eek: When they saw I was not going to go away until they did, he made his threat, but obviously did not carry it out, or even attempt to do so. That was a while ago, and I did not have my gun with me because my permit had expired - my fault for waiting to renew it, but we were not sure what county we would be in, and it is a county by county thing here. I started carrying it anyway after that incident. I would rather be in jail for shooting a BG than in a box for obeying that particular law. Of course, my permit is current and in my pocket at all times now (among other things). :D
 
Hey, give these guys a break. Haven't you read your history? Before handguns there were no murders at all. People were happy, smiled, and loved their neighbors. There were no killings at all. And then those nasty people had to invent handguns and the world went to hell in a handbasket. If we just get rid of all the guns, we won't have any murders anymore, and we'll get right back to the nirvana that once existed.
 
Yup it's true. Before these nasty guns were invented dying was rather pleasant.

Instead of being shot with a projectile traveling thousands of feet per second you were run through with 3-6 feet of steel and wood. If you were lucky it wouldn't be a gut wound. If it was you could beg your adversary to take your head off or smash your skull in with a large blunt weapon. Some people were impaled with pieces of wood with pieces of iron or steel on the tips, thrown through the air or shot from curved pieces of wood with strings.

Oh I long for such civilized times. If only the guns were gone.
 
One word: machete.

Weapon of choice once the handguns are gone.

Personally I think I am much more likely to survive a handgun shooting than being macheted.


G
 
The Machete was the weapon of choice in Ruwanda, where bodies were choking the waterways bobbing in lake Victoria.

Ash
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top