A co worker of mine used this term when talking about her troubled teen.
The teen used the term "blame shifting".
It hit me that our opponents are in fact using this on us.
Let's put this in perspective
An area has problems with gangs and drugs. Gangs and Drugs are a result of failed government policies, but there are groups that have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo or even expanding it.
What they do is find a scapegoat, ie, guns.
They then get on their soapbox with the MSM and blame the easy availbility of semi automatic assault weapons that fire 1200rpm that have no sporting purpose.
There attacks are emotional and they go for people's hearts. They pick victims, often children so that they can have the nice tear jerk effect.
We respond with logic and intellectual arguments. Since emotion is what actually moves people, our arguments for our rights falls on deaf ears.
Does anything get done to deal with the real problems, of course not.
Those who created the problems shfit blame from them to us.
The fact is most gun owners are in suburban and rural areas, these gangs operate in urban areas, so what we have here are two different worlds.
Most gun owners are white males, most victims of gun violence are non white.
Here we have a racial divide.
Many people in urban areas don't own guns and all they see is bad news with guns everyday. They are willing to sacrifice a right they never exercise for the public safety.
What we need to do is recognize this pattern and develop a counter offensive to this.
Wecan't do this by ourselves, we are going to have to align with others and many of those who we may have to align with may be anti gun.
If our attitude is that we have differences on guns, but we will work together on things we agree on to reduce violence, it is a win win situation for both of us.
The drug war is responsible directly and indirectly for anywhere between 30 to 50 percent of crime in our country.
Gang members are someone's kids. Many of them are beyond hope, but some are not. It does not matter if we are successful, what matters is we gave the appearance of caring.
Bill Clinton was a master of it, over the years I watched him smooze every week about what he wanted to do. It didin't matter that alot of what he said was never done, what mattered was the perception that he had a heart and that he felt people's pain.
We will never get national leftist organizations to work with us because they thrive on the culture of victimization. Eliminate the culture and their existence is in jeopardy.
It will be the local churches, the local citizen activists, the people who have to live in these urban war zones and who want a better life for their kids that will get involved.
It is the grandma who has lost many children to gun violence that will become our ally once she realizes that she has been used.
The issue has never really been guns, it has been control.
Right now our country is in for some very hard economic times because our money is in jeopardy.
WE can fix our economic problems, but it would require changes that many interests would be against since they put their self interest above the survival of the country.
AS a result, the **** will hit the fan, and those who created the mess are going to look for someone to blame.
Every minority group is at risk depending on who is in power.
Our gun rights will be in jeopardy even if we get the best ruling from SCOTUS on the Heller case.
New Orleans had a RKBA, yet when Katrina hit, that didn't stop gun confiscation.
Nicki
The teen used the term "blame shifting".
It hit me that our opponents are in fact using this on us.
Let's put this in perspective
An area has problems with gangs and drugs. Gangs and Drugs are a result of failed government policies, but there are groups that have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo or even expanding it.
What they do is find a scapegoat, ie, guns.
They then get on their soapbox with the MSM and blame the easy availbility of semi automatic assault weapons that fire 1200rpm that have no sporting purpose.
There attacks are emotional and they go for people's hearts. They pick victims, often children so that they can have the nice tear jerk effect.
We respond with logic and intellectual arguments. Since emotion is what actually moves people, our arguments for our rights falls on deaf ears.
Does anything get done to deal with the real problems, of course not.
Those who created the problems shfit blame from them to us.
The fact is most gun owners are in suburban and rural areas, these gangs operate in urban areas, so what we have here are two different worlds.
Most gun owners are white males, most victims of gun violence are non white.
Here we have a racial divide.
Many people in urban areas don't own guns and all they see is bad news with guns everyday. They are willing to sacrifice a right they never exercise for the public safety.
What we need to do is recognize this pattern and develop a counter offensive to this.
Wecan't do this by ourselves, we are going to have to align with others and many of those who we may have to align with may be anti gun.
If our attitude is that we have differences on guns, but we will work together on things we agree on to reduce violence, it is a win win situation for both of us.
The drug war is responsible directly and indirectly for anywhere between 30 to 50 percent of crime in our country.
Gang members are someone's kids. Many of them are beyond hope, but some are not. It does not matter if we are successful, what matters is we gave the appearance of caring.
Bill Clinton was a master of it, over the years I watched him smooze every week about what he wanted to do. It didin't matter that alot of what he said was never done, what mattered was the perception that he had a heart and that he felt people's pain.
We will never get national leftist organizations to work with us because they thrive on the culture of victimization. Eliminate the culture and their existence is in jeopardy.
It will be the local churches, the local citizen activists, the people who have to live in these urban war zones and who want a better life for their kids that will get involved.
It is the grandma who has lost many children to gun violence that will become our ally once she realizes that she has been used.
The issue has never really been guns, it has been control.
Right now our country is in for some very hard economic times because our money is in jeopardy.
WE can fix our economic problems, but it would require changes that many interests would be against since they put their self interest above the survival of the country.
AS a result, the **** will hit the fan, and those who created the mess are going to look for someone to blame.
Every minority group is at risk depending on who is in power.
Our gun rights will be in jeopardy even if we get the best ruling from SCOTUS on the Heller case.
New Orleans had a RKBA, yet when Katrina hit, that didn't stop gun confiscation.
Nicki