Blue Shirts, Blue Steel, and Revolvers

Kleanbore

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
17,477
I was happy to see CraigC's post today about the new Colt Python in blue.

Stainless is less resistant to corrosion and holster wear, but for many of us older folks, blue steel sure does look a lwhole ot better.

When I was on the co-op plan in the early to mid 1960s, I headed out to a sporting goods store just about every week and ambled down to the gun counter. The guys behind the counter, other customers, and LEOs who had dropped in for something like a kid's baseball glove would gather for some gun talk.

The usual topic was revolvers. Before concealed carry, most people who actually carried handguns were police officers, and they carried revolvers.

There were no double action Rugers then. The talk was all about Colt's and Smith and Wessons--which way the cylinder turned, rifling, the single and double action trigger pulls, and the fact that Colt's had to be sent in to be "tuned" every so often.

I really wanted a Combat Masterpiece, but there was a supply shortage. I bought an Officer's Model Match, but after we were married, I needed the $150, and I sold it.

I now have a 686+ five inch that I really do like, with good rubber grips. Craig once described guns like that as "dishwasher safe"... . Yeah, but they just don't have the look of blue steel.

When I first saw that blue Python, my first thought was about an Officers' Model clone.

I would sure like to see a really tough, realistic looking blue finish for steel.

Wouldn't it be loverly.
 
I was happy to see CraigC's post today about the new Colt Python in blue.

Stainless is less resistant to corrosion and holster wear, but for many of us older folks, blue steel sure does look a lwhole ot better.

When I was on the co-op plan in the early to mid 1960s, I headed out to a sporting goods store just about every week and ambled down to the gun counter. The guys behind the counter, other customers, and LEOs who had dropped in for something like a kid's baseball glove would gather for some gun talk.

The usual topic was revolvers. Before concealed carry, most people who actually carried handguns were police officers, and they carried revolvers.

There were no double action Rugers then. The talk was all about Colt's and Smith and Wessons--which way the cylinder turned, rifling, the single and double action trigger pulls, and the fact that Colt's had to be sent in to be "tuned" every so often.

I really wanted a Combat Masterpiece, but there was a supply shortage. I bought an Officer's Model Match, but after we were married, I needed the $150, and I sold it.

I now have a 686+ five inch that I really do like, with good rubber grips. Craig once described guns like that as "dishwasher safe"... . Yeah, but they just don't have the look of blue steel.

When I first saw that blue Python, my first thought was about an Officers' Model clone.

I would sure like to see a really tough, realistic looking blue finish for steel.

Wouldn't it be loverly.
my Prized Officer Model! I’m saving to shoot when I get good. Cost me way more than $150!

Also.. Us middle age men/women love Blue too! Not a fan of Shiny
IMG_0235.jpeg
 
I was happy to see CraigC's post today about the new Colt Python in blue.

Stainless is less resistant to corrosion and holster wear, but for many of us older folks, blue steel sure does look a lwhole ot better.

When I was on the co-op plan in the early to mid 1960s, I headed out to a sporting goods store just about every week and ambled down to the gun counter. The guys behind the counter, other customers, and LEOs who had dropped in for something like a kid's baseball glove would gather for some gun talk.

The usual topic was revolvers. Before concealed carry, most people who actually carried handguns were police officers, and they carried revolvers.

There were no double action Rugers then. The talk was all about Colt's and Smith and Wessons--which way the cylinder turned, rifling, the single and double action trigger pulls, and the fact that Colt's had to be sent in to be "tuned" every so often.

I really wanted a Combat Masterpiece, but there was a supply shortage. I bought an Officer's Model Match, but after we were married, I needed the $150, and I sold it.

I now have a 686+ five inch that I really do like, with good rubber grips. Craig once described guns like that as "dishwasher safe"... . Yeah, but they just don't have the look of blue steel.

When I first saw that blue Python, my first thought was about an Officers' Model clone.

I would sure like to see a really tough, realistic looking blue finish for steel.

Wouldn't it be loverly.
I've seen pictures of a "DLC" high polished finish that looks very convincing. One example is from Korth/Nighthawk. It really looks nice.
 
Some revolvers just look weird in certain finishes.
For example, I really don't care for the blued M586, but love 686s.
The newer blued SP101s make my brain itch, it's just, just- wrong! 😁

Pythons, both new and old, look great in any finish. Well, maybe not Coltguard matte E-nickel, but we try to forget about that one.....
My (also prized) Officers Model Match-
IMG_20201114_172321_2.jpg
 
Some revolvers just look weird in certain finishes.
For example, I really don't care for the blued M586, but love 686s.
The newer blued SP101s make my brain itch, it's just, just- wrong! 😁

Pythons, both new and old, look great in any finish. Well, maybe not Coltguard matte E-nickel, but we try to forget about that one.....
My (also prized) Officers Model Match-
View attachment 1191203
that Match needs a factory wood box like I got!
 
I would sure like to see a really tough, realistic looking blue finish for steel.
Me too, Kleanbore. I like stainless, because there's no guilt in not wiping it, and even like the looks.
But something as durable as stainless, that looks blued....that would be a world beater.
Not $9k like the Korth..... :0
Moon
 
I am rather picky about a gun's looks, especially revolvers, but the three vents don't bother me a bit. OP made a boo-boo about the qualities of stainless steel but knowing what he meant to say will let it slide but what does a blue shirt have to do with anything? :)
 
Last edited:
There is something about the early Colt and N-frame S&W bluing that just stirs the soul. You almost sink into it, the color is so rich.

Model 57 no-dash .41 Mag. IMG_0653.jpeg

A nearly 100 year old Officers Model Heavy Barrel .38 Spl. IMG_1544.jpeg

I really do like stainless guns for their ease of care, but like many of you I love blued steel more.

Stay safe.
 
Stainless or blue they are both, bottom line, just tools.
But the blue especially in many S&Ws and the Colts
ttranscends them into a form a art.

Every time I look at one of my Model 15s along with
my Model 67 I clearly see that difference.
 
There is something about the early Colt and N-frame S&W bluing that just stirs the soul. You almost sink into it, the color is so rich.

Model 57 no-dash .41 Mag. View attachment 1191366

A nearly 100 year old Officers Model Heavy Barrel .38 Spl.View attachment 1191367

I really do like stainless guns for their ease of care, but like many of you I love blued steel more.

Stay safe.
You are not kidding! I’ll buy a old gun or new just because the blueing is so good! Love the liquid ink look!!

IMG_0240.jpeg IMG_0239.jpeg IMG_0238.jpeg
 
I've handle both the new python and( recently)the Anaconda. As much as I like stainless, I love dad's 1976 vintage Python. I been back and forth on buying one or the other, or not, but when Craig posted that, that ended the am I getting one or not debate. It's now, am I getting the Python or waiting for them to do the Anaconda.....unfortunately, it'll probably end up being both. I'm screwed.....
 
Stainless or blue they are both, bottom line, just tools.
But the blue especially in many S&Ws and the Colts
ttranscends them into a form a art.
Yep. "a gun is a tool, Marian".

When I look at the new new blue Python, I imagine it without the rib and the underlug, and it takes me back to the old days.

But as a tool, it would be better with ome protection for the ejector rod.

And--my tool needs are fulfilled by my 686+.
 
I'm just to the point where stainless doesn't do anything for me. As much as I love revolvers, it's a purely romantic interest. I have stainless guns that are dear to me but it's in spite of being stainless, not because of it. With some guns, like the Super Redhawk, there are no other options. The idea of spending time with a plain stainless, rubber gripped medium frame .357 bores me to tears. It's not any sort of elitist position to take, they just don't interest me. If I'm gonna mess with guns that don't make me feel a certain way, they might as well be a modern polymer auto.
 
Back
Top