Bond Arms/Boberg Ultra Compact 9mm BullPup

Status
Not open for further replies.
On a side note, I'm really enjoying this exchange. I made an assertion and people are trying to verify or falsify my claim . . . the scientific method at work! Based on your comments and dedicated detective work, it appears that my assertion is only valid for the Bond Bullpup, but not for the Bobergs.

Anyway, someone with a Bond Bullpup, line up a cartridge so that the base of the case is even with the back edge of the magazine and see if you can get it stuck. You can see in the videos (review video above, and analysis video included here) that's what I did, and doing so produces a consistent lock on the Bond gun, every time. My snap caps and live ammo caused a lock with as little as 1/8" (more or less) of rearward movement - I think the variability in location may be based on minor production variations from one mag to another.
Someone with a Boberg, take the thing apart and see if there's a lip at the bottom of the bolt face. I've never owned one, so I'm not as familiar with what that slide assembly looks like inside.
You folks with Bobergs might also try what I did to finally figure out the problem - do a paper test. Wrap paper around the top round, load the magazine and drop it again, then shift the round slightly (again and again) until the round is as far back in the magazine as it can possibly go while still being able to load the magazine in the gun.
Chances are you'll see the extractor tongs cut into the paper exactly where they're supposed to when the round is positioned correctly. That indent on either side of the round will shift as you move the round to the rear (of course).
If someone with a Boberg would care to try the paper test, I'd love to see your results.
At a certain point on the Bond, the lip at the bottom of the guide ramp cuts into the paper, ahead of the case rim. That's a lock.
I don't know if a Boberg will have the same problem. It's a slightly different gun and there's no telling what Bond changed when they took over.
In this video, I had previously assumed the extractor tongs were exerting pressure on the barrel or the locking block (thus, my comments about them toward the end of the video). Further analysis indicated the effect of the tongs was negligible (if any), and that it was the guide ramp lip that was causing the problem.
If you go through this process and never succeed in getting the guide ramp lip to engage in front of the case rim . . . congratulations - you're probably not holding a Bond Bullpup.
 
Last edited:
While it's not under controlled conditions, you can see the same malfunction at around 13:43 in this video. If you watch the entire video, you may note that there's a lot more going on, but the slide lock is unmistakable when it happens.
 
I'll have to test it in my Bullpup (000342).

Not sure I'm ready to send it back if it does the same thing (not casting any aspersions on your decision to do so, however), but it's good information to know regardless.

No offense taken. I really, really didn't want to send it back. I'd spent so much time anticipating it, reading about it, watching other folks's videos; and when it arrived I was basically delighted with the fit and finish . . . it's a great-looking gun, and compact as all get-out. A little bulky from left to right, but not annoyingly so. Great accuracy with that rotating barrel and smooth DA trigger pull . . . and so on.
I still like it a lot, you may be able to tell.
And if you're willing to work around a known problem, there's no reason to send it back. Enjoy the heck out of it, and like Chance says up the thread a little, if you're aware of the "quirks of ammo and magazine loading" then you're fine. You could do that paper test I mentioned up-thread to see where you stand.
I'm just trying to make people aware of the issue. Reviews aren't supposed to be universally glowing - they're supposed to be an accurate and honest assessment of the subject.
I'd suggest that knowledge of this problem could serve to reassure you. If you know what's possible, you can either take action ahead of time to mitigate it, or take appropriate corrective action in the event.
Keep it or return it - that's up to you. I did the math and made a personal decision. Regardless of my choice, if you decide to keep it, I'd bet good money that you'll be thankful you got this knowledge ahead of time rather than learning it the hard way in a few hot seconds.
 
Last edited:
On a side note, I'm really enjoying this exchange. I made an assertion and people are trying to verify or falsify my claim . . . the scientific method at work! Based on your comments and dedicated detective work, it appears that my assertion is only valid for the Bond Bullpup, but not for the Bobergs.

Anyway, someone with a Bond Bullpup, line up a cartridge so that the base of the case is even with the back edge of the magazine and see if you can get it stuck. You can see in the videos (review video above, and analysis video included here) that's what I did, and doing so produces a consistent lock on the Bond gun, every time. My snap caps and live ammo caused a lock with as little as 1/8" (more or less) of rearward movement - I think the variability in location may be based on minor production variations from one mag to another.


PS: if you get the top round misaligned just right in the Bond Bullpup magazine, the case rim will butt directly against the bottom of the guide ramp lip, making it almost impossible to seat the magazine. This thing is really sensitive to cartridge position!
 
Last edited:
Chance: regarding this line from one of my previous entries:
Interesting that you haven't been able to replicate the problem on the Boberg. I know Bond say they made some changes, I wonder if this was one of them?
I should apologize for thinking you were attempting to replicate the problem on your Boberg. I re-read your earlier post and see that you also have a very early Bond Bullpup. I'm curious if Bond changed something from the very early models like yours, to the not-as-early models like mine.
I had SN000135, which I thought was a pretty low number. Is yours substantially younger than that?
Does yours have the drop-down lip at the bottom of the bolt face? Without that, you probably won't get it to lock up.
This is the lower end of the guide ramp on 000135 (slide assy is inverted for the picture)
IMG_1561.JPG
I can understand the Bobergs being different enough that they won't have the same problem, but I'd be awfully surprised if Bond revised their tooling or processes substantially during a production run. Did you get a chance to try that paper test I demonstrated in my other video? If so, I'm curious to see photos or videos of your results, as well as photos of your guide ramp. It'd be nice to have a concrete comparison of apples to apples.
Even without the paper, it shouldn't take a couple of hours to replicate the problem. Just slide that top round all the way to the rear of the mag, just to where you can still insert the magazine with the base of the cartridge sliding along the back of the mag well. That should ensure the slide locks up. If it doesn't, that indicates there's something different about your gun.
 
Hi there -

I've owned a Boberg XR9-L since they were first announced (L00547) and have never had an issue with it feeding as long as I followed the guidance from Arne B. I carry this longer version in a Stoner crossdraw holster and can frequently forget I even have it on!

Recently in looking at a review of the new Bond Bullpup (formerly the Boberg XR9-S)I noticed that they have taken to having their barrel and locking block coated and the name Robar came up. I contacted Robar and - like "a number of other Boberg customers" - sent them my barrel and locking block to have their NP3 coating applied ($78). This avoids a potential "galling" problem in the original design of the Boberg. I just received it back today and will have to take it to the range soon to see if this makes any appreciable difference. By the way I don't have a lip on the in my pistol but it's only digested around 350 rounds so far although I tried inserting a cartridge as suggested above and can't make the slide lockup.

Bond is considering coming out with the longer 9mm version as well as the .45 shorty version. Now, if someone could just tell me where I could pick up a set of the gorgeous wood grips like Bond uses I would be a happier camper!
 
Now, if someone could just tell me where I could pick up a set of the gorgeous wood grips like Bond uses I would be a happier camper!

[Have you tried calling Bond up and asking? I'd be surprised if they wouldn't sell you a set...]

Edit: Never mind, I missed the part where you said it was an XR45. Bond probably won't have grips for that until they start making the Bullpup45.

In case any other Boberg owners find this: when I ordered my Bullpup, the Bond rep said that they were offering a barrel/locking block conversion for XR owners (not surprising since Bond is now the service provider for existing Bobergs), but it seems, from your experience, that it might be cheaper to go through the coating manufacturer.
 
Last edited:
Even without the paper, it shouldn't take a couple of hours to replicate the problem. Just slide that top round all the way to the rear of the mag, just to where you can still insert the magazine with the base of the cartridge sliding along the back of the mag well. That should ensure the slide locks up. If it doesn't, that indicates there's something different about your gun.

Well, I spent about 20 minutes trying to replicate the lockup, and I was unable to. I intend to make a more in-depth attempt when I have more time (and some snap caps on hand; I wasn't comfortable getting too forceful trying to force a jam with live rounds).

If I pulled out the round so that it was flush with the back wall of the magazine, the magazine wouldn't insert fully. If I pulled out the magazine and reinserted it (without touching the cartridge) the round appeared to get pushed forward just enough for the mag to go in the second time, and it had no trouble chambering the round. I was unable to insert the magazine with the cartridge pulled out farther than that. It seemed like putting the mag in was pushing the round forward until the magazine feed "fingers" caught on the front of the case, and that was far enough in to chamber the round.

I will try again with the snap caps and maybe a couple different brands of ammo. The bottom of my bolt face has a lip but it doesn't look as pronounced as yours. Otherwise I don't know what the difference could be (other than that I'm possibly not doing it right).
 
Occasionally I'll carry my Boberg in a OWB, but most of the time I prefer an ankle carry. The BugBite ankle holster is the most comfortable I've found, wear it all day and forget you have it on. 001.JPG

008.JPG 003.JPG

The head scratcher for me was redlace finding the issue with rounds not completely seated in his bull Bullpup and calling it unacceptable for a carry firearm. Yet he acknowledged the M4/M16 had the same issue, and served with that same thing on a firearm more likely to see risk of life in combat. Sure he didn't send his service rifle back.
 
Last edited:
The head scratcher for me was redlace finding the issue with rounds not completely seated in his bull Bullpup and calling it unacceptable for a carry firearm. Yet he acknowledged the M4/M16 had the same issue, and served with that same thing on a firearm more likely to see risk of life in combat. Sure he didn't send his service rifle back.
I didn't have a choice with the M16/M4.
I do have a choice about what I carry on a daily basis . . . and since I'm paying for the gun, I'm going to exercise that choice and get the most reliable gun I can.

It became habit to seat the rounds in a 30 round mag with a solid tap on the helmet/receiver/hand, but my service rifle never locked up (like the Bond Bullpup) if I failed to do so. And honestly, I can't recall too many failures of any sort with my M4.
I also carried a Beretta M9 and a Mossberg 500 at various times in Iraq and Afghanistan. Neither of those would be an ideal concealed carry gun for me as a civilian, (certainly not the shottie!) but they weren't sensitive to round placement in the magazine.
My Ruger LCP isn't quite as comfortable to shoot as the Bond, and it doesn't pack quite the same punch, but it sure does work - every time.
 
Last edited:
If I pulled out the round so that it was flush with the back wall of the magazine, the magazine wouldn't insert fully. If I pulled out the magazine and reinserted it (without touching the cartridge) the round appeared to get pushed forward just enough for the mag to go in the second time, and it had no trouble chambering the round. I was unable to insert the magazine with the cartridge pulled out farther than that. It seemed like putting the mag in was pushing the round forward until the magazine feed "fingers" caught on the front of the case, and that was far enough in to chamber the round.(other than that I'm possibly not doing it right).
This is a condition I also experienced - not being able to insert the magazine fully. If I got the top round lined up just right, the case rim would hit the lip and stop.
With that being the case in your gun, you might find that workable. If the mag won't fully seat, just drop it and re-adjust the round, then seat the mag. As you can see in my videos, my gun has a prominent lip that'll fully catch. At least you know what you're dealing with.
That difference between our guns indicates some possible consistency issues on the assembly line at Bond.
 
Quick follow up: several folks have watched the Youtube review and the paper test videos, and state clearly in the Youtube comments that their Bond Bullpups do not lock up like this.
It would appear that Bond has done something to address the lock up.
Those stating that their guns don't lock up have indicated that, with the round far enough to the rear of the magazine, the magazine can be difficult or impossible to seat. That leads me to believe Bond simply filed off the lip at the lower end of the guide ramp, and maybe shaped that area of the slide a little bit.
Without an updated version in my hands, it's impossible to say what they did. But I'll at least give them credit for doing something.
 
Quick follow up: several folks have watched the Youtube review and the paper test videos, and state clearly in the Youtube comments that their Bond Bullpups do not lock up like this.
It would appear that Bond has done something to address the lock up.
Those stating that their guns don't lock up have indicated that, with the round far enough to the rear of the magazine, the magazine can be difficult or impossible to seat. That leads me to believe Bond simply filed off the lip at the lower end of the guide ramp, and maybe shaped that area of the slide a little bit.
Without an updated version in my hands, it's impossible to say what they did. But I'll at least give them credit for doing something.

Just to follow up: I was able to get mine to lock up eventually, but at that point the magazine was clearly not seated properly. I had to really jam it in in order for the mag to stay in the grip, and I could still pull it out without hitting the release.

With the round that far back, it was barely being held in the magazine by the feed "fingers", and kept wanting to fall out on it's own.

I'm glad to have the information that it's possible for a lockup to happen, but on my specific gun I can't imagine how it would get into that state unintentionally.

I'll continue carrying mine and just make it a point to check the mags when I load up...
 
on my specific gun I can't imagine how it would get into that state unintentionally.
If it takes that much effort to get it to lock up, I have to agree with you that you're probably not going to encounter this issue under normal use.
You can see in my videos that it took no effort at all to induce the problem. Mine seemed like it was waiting for me to look at it cross-eyed so it could lock up on me.
There are a lot of features about this gun that made me not want to return it, so it's reassuring to hear that they're not all like mine was.
 
I have an inquiry in to Robar regarding treating the slide and locking block on my early 45 to eliminate the need for the special grease. It's rather a PIA. I've been having mostly good luck with mine once I increased the crimp on my reloads.
 
Locking block and barrel are enroute to Robar. They said they've received several inquiries on the Boberg recently. I ran about 50 reloads thru it today flawlessly so I feel it is worth the expense to get the treatment done. Note - I got an extra length barrel from Boberg before they transitioned to Bond. I think it's about a half inch longer. Works great. I am having only the longer bbl treated. Will take 4-6 weeks. That's OK. I have other guns.....
 
An update for those who are interested. I contacted BOND Customer Service and was able to order a pair of their Bullpup grips for my Boberg XR9 for $85 + shipping. A bit pricey I admit, but they should really spice up the look (and feel) of the gun!
 
I closely examined second-hand original gun sample. My conclusion was the gun was overly complex yet offering no meaningful advantage over something traditional like the R9.
 
I closely examined second-hand original gun sample. My conclusion was the gun was overly complex yet offering no meaningful advantage over something traditional like the R9.

This is typical. We all have opinions. I would have never considered the R9 traditional, nor would I have considered it mainstream. Like the Boberg/Bond gun it has problems with some ammo. Unlike the Boberg/Bond, you have to be very careful how you grip the gun to avoid "limp wrist failures". You need to replace the spring every 200 rounds according to Rohrbaugh. It has a very stout recoil which the Boberg/Bond does not. They both sell for about the same price.

Now, I understand why someone who had a Rohrbaugh R9 would defend them, but having shot one and having owned the .45 ACP version, I cannot understand someone claiming the Boberg/Bond Arms Bullpup has no meaningful advantage over the Rohrbaugh R9.

Granted, the Rohrbaugh R9 is a couple of ounces lighter and seems a little smaller, and is only 0.83" thick where the Boberg is 0.96" thick; and the Boberg/Bond Arms is taller yet 0.1" shorter. The barrel is longer on the Boberg/Bond Arms by a significant amount 0.6" however.

Try as I might however with the .45 ACP version, I just could not get as fast as I wanted from a concealed carry draw and still hit the targets where I wanted. In fairness this might be me however. In contrast, the first time I picked up a Boberg and drew it from a holster, it was amazingly fast. The Bond Bullpup works even better for me because of the changed grips.

Here is what I think. Both are great guns, and depending on what they are being used for, different people will like one better over the other. The deal killer for me was, in part, the fact even the manufacturer of the Rohrbaugh R9 instructed you not to practice with it. Any carry gun of mine is going to be shot regularly and frequently. With the Rohrbaugh R9, I would be buying 52 springs a year, assuming my hand would tolerate the recoil.
 
Looks like Bond might be working on a long slide version; they just let TTAG play with a prototype (Boberg XR9-L chassis with the upgraded BP9 internals):
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/02/robert-farago/bond-arms-xr9-l-long-slide-bullpup-revealed/

If they had released that one first, I might have gotten it instead and been happy. I imagine it carries more securely in a regular holster, and the longer sight radius would be nice. As it is, I'm not sure whether I'll get a long one. The shorty still works flawlessly, and I can't see the long one being as good in a pocket.
 
The long slide version has more of a "normal" handgun look than the short one. Nicely done.
Also, I really like their suppressor solution that they previewed at SHOT. Quick and secure, and no unscrewing itself.
 
Cheaper, yes, just as effective, yes, but it wouldn't fit in my pocket. The BP9 does. Now, sure, a ton of other micro 9's would too. Whether the extra inch or more of barrel length really makes it that much more effective than an R9 or whatever is something that could be argued for ages without an answer; no question, I'm a sucker for "cool engineering marvels", and I accept this about myself.

For what it's worth, if it turns out to be reliable with quality SD ammo, I'll be happy with the purchase. It'll hard to tell from online pictures how tiny this thing is. It's literally shorter (OAL) than the LCP2. It's slightly taller and thicker (height and thickness feel pretty similar to my XDS .45), but for the extra bulk I get 8 rounds of 9mm +p on tap. Since holstered pocket carry is one of my main intentions for it, it's the length that matters to me (For reference, I could pocket the XDS but the bottom of the grip would stick out of the pocket).

It's very well made; everything's tight but moves easily, and I haven't been able to find any tool marks. I'll be taking it to the range tomorrow; I'll update after that.

View attachment 625788

Great pic, thanks. I really like the idea behind this gun...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top