Books: Conflict Communications, The Sociopath Next Door

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fred Fuller

Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 26, 2004
Messages
21,215
Location
AL, NC
Also available for Kindle and nook as are all his other books. Very inexpensive.

As usual Rory is spot on and an easy read.

Thanks Fred.

( I love the phrase"Do you really want to do this"?)
 
Im not sure it is different, just more analytical and in depth. Thomson and Jenkins did a good job, set the cornerstone as it were, especially with the 10 things not to say. Rory just gives me a little more.
 
I hope the mods don't mind a bump for an old thread; it's tough to find time to get through a book these days, but I recently finished the audiobook version of The Sociopath Next Door. It was interesting and worthwhile, and the narration was worthy for those of us that choose to go the audiobook route. I'd encourage anyone to check out the book.

The author estimates 4% of the general population are sociopathic; among prisoners, the estimate is about 20-40%. Not all of those are dangerous; many in society live lives characterized by impulsivity, laziness, lack of follow through. The big common factor is a lack of empathy. When this is wielded in violence or mental abuse, the results can be particularly torturous and horrific to the victims.

In my own background, I had experience with an individual who on further reflection fit the characteristics of this type. It can't be overstated that the common mental image of a sociopath as a recognizable evil genius is a false stereotype. It's the charmer with the perfect cover you don't suspect. The person I knew was not violent, but nonetheless dangerous; he seemed to take great pleasure in derailing the lives and careers of others, seemingly just for fun or to advance himself. Even this interaction, magnified in a deployed environment, left some pretty significant mental scarring on some people.

The science in the book is not sound–sociopathy is not a recognized disorder in the Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders used to ID and classify mental illness. But for our purposes, this type of person is out there regardless of label, and recognizing this type is important for purposes of strategic thinking, as Fred said, and beyond in knowing what to avoid in the formation of friendships, business partnerships, and even marriage.

"You are the average of the 5 people you spend the most time with." Ideally we choose wisely, but even without that focus life is better if we can at least detect and avoid letting the wrong ones in.
 
The science in the book is not sound–sociopathy is not a recognized disorder in the Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders used to ID and classify mental illness.

Apparently most of the "science" in psychology is not sound:

http://www.theguardian.com/science/...-on-validity-of-psychology-experiment-results

A major investigation into scores of claims made in psychology research journals has delivered a bleak verdict on the state of the science.

An international team of experts repeated 100 experiments published in top psychology journals and found that they could reproduce only 36% of original findings.

The study, which saw 270 scientists repeat experiments on five continents, was launched by psychologists in the US in response to rising concerns over the reliability of psychology research.
 
I agree, Jeff. My own wild guess is that psychiatry and neuroscience, along with other related fields to brain science such as endocrinology and genetics, will eventual displace psychology to the realm of a pseudoscience. Perhaps not for a few more decades, and perhaps I'm wrong. But if it happens I wouldn't be surprised.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top