I now have two Trijicon AccuPoint scopes. The first one I got was the 2.5-10x 50mm with the post/red triangle. I've found it to be very easy to acquire a target, and the red triangle is very bright. If you're mail-ordering it (as I did), don't forget that these are physically big scopes, and will add a bit of weight to an AR.
The second I picked up from a local store, its a 1.5-4x with the amber #4 mil-dot (they refer to it as the "German" crosshairs). This one seemed decent in the store under the florescent lights, but when I got it home and was mounting it on the rifle in weaker lighting, the tiny amber dot barely shows up at all. I would say under moderate lighting -- lighting that the red triangle shows up strongly under -- the small dot is useless.
As far as lens quality goes, I would say the optic clarity on these scopes is closer to Simmons than it is to Leupold. The 10x at full magnification is fuzzy and distorted around the edges.
So, in conclusion, I would say go for the big lit triangles and avoid the "German #4 dot", and I hope they are as rugged and durable as the Acogs that Trijicon makes, because if I paid all that money just for the mediocre glass clarity, I paid too much. If I have a truly rugged scope with (at least in one case) a very bright non-battery powered dot, then I did OK. I guess time will tell.
I'd be curious to hear anyone's experiences or opinions.
The second I picked up from a local store, its a 1.5-4x with the amber #4 mil-dot (they refer to it as the "German" crosshairs). This one seemed decent in the store under the florescent lights, but when I got it home and was mounting it on the rifle in weaker lighting, the tiny amber dot barely shows up at all. I would say under moderate lighting -- lighting that the red triangle shows up strongly under -- the small dot is useless.
As far as lens quality goes, I would say the optic clarity on these scopes is closer to Simmons than it is to Leupold. The 10x at full magnification is fuzzy and distorted around the edges.
So, in conclusion, I would say go for the big lit triangles and avoid the "German #4 dot", and I hope they are as rugged and durable as the Acogs that Trijicon makes, because if I paid all that money just for the mediocre glass clarity, I paid too much. If I have a truly rugged scope with (at least in one case) a very bright non-battery powered dot, then I did OK. I guess time will tell.
I'd be curious to hear anyone's experiences or opinions.
Last edited: