Browning Hi-Power vs CZ75

[atblis]

Despite

Despite their similar appearance, they are quite different pistols.

Almost entirely personal preference. Personally, HiPowers do not fit my hands. CZs do very well.

Triggers both suck in stock form (both are fixable).

I'll catch some flak for this one
CZs are on their way up in the popularity department (more parts and stuff)
HiPowers have stagnated in popularity and are perhaps decreasing.

To make this decision you need to shoot both side by side, and then decide which one you like more.

 

[Marshall]

Dude all semi-autos look alike. Considering their internals are quite different, kind of foolish to call one a copy or attempt to copy another.

Next up, only buy a colt peacemaker, because all revolvers look like it.

All automobiles look the same too, have four wheels, doors, a trunk, windows, a roof, bumbers. Only buy Ford model T's?

Dude, that's Marshall to you.

All revolvers do not look alike, neither do all shotguns, rifles, pistols or knives.

I am glad I don't see all things through your eyes. I would hate to go through life thinking all dogs look alike because they have four legs, two ears a tail and bark. All people have two legs, two arms, a head and an ass, even though some are evidently mostly ass.

If a Browning Hi Power, any 1911, a Sig 220, an HK P7 and a Beretta Tomcat all look alike to you I respectfully suggest you put down the pipe.

If you'll perform a search function you'll see that this question of comparing the CZ 75 and the High Power comes up quite often. Obviously many people compare them two guns when buying, but far be it from me to suggest that's because they are similar in outward appearance. The first time you see a thread asking whether someone should buy a Hi Power or a P3AT, please PM me and tell me you told me so.