I’m was looking for the relative (to other powders) burn rate for True Blue and so far I’ve found 58 from LoadData.com, 44 from Grafs.com, and 22 from hodgdonpowderco.com relative numbers where smaller means faster burning.
Some of this might be explained by there are different powders in the charts but the overlap of powders makes this a small contributor to explaining the large differences.
No doubt this inconsistency can be found with many powders. What’s the deal with this?
Some of this might be explained by there are different powders in the charts but the overlap of powders makes this a small contributor to explaining the large differences.
No doubt this inconsistency can be found with many powders. What’s the deal with this?
Last edited: