C&R and selling guns?

Status
Not open for further replies.

greenr18

member
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
562
Location
Earth
I just noticed the back of my C&R license says the holder is permitted to "buy or sell" C&R firearms. Notice I didn't say and. Sooooooo I knew it permitted me of course to have C&R stuff come directly to me, but I can do one or the other? Or does it actually permit both? I didn't know you could sell without a storefront and a different type of license, or can you? If I can, how would I set up the NICS and everything?
 
I just noticed the back of my C&R license says the holder is permitted to "buy or sell" C&R firearms. Notice I didn't say and. Sooooooo I knew it permitted me of course to have C&R stuff come directly to me, but I can do one or the other? Or does it actually permit both? I didn't know you could sell without a storefront and a different type of license, or can you? If I can, how would I set up the NICS and everything?
An 03 FFL doesn't qualify you to conduct a business. You need an 01 FFL to do that. Much more involved. You can sell guns in your collection to manage your collection, but if it starts to look to the ATF like you're in the business of selling guns, they'll not take to kindly to it. And, no, it's not either "buy" or "sell". You can do both.

That's the condensed version.

Matt
 
If it's within your state, you can do a face to face sale per state law or ship directly if the buyer also has an FFL03. If it's across state lines, and both parties have FFL03 licenses, you can ship to the buyer directly. No NICS or FFL01 transfer necessary.

You must record the disposal of the firearm in your bound book with the buyers FFL03 number or other basic identifying information (name and address...drivers license number? Can't exactly remember).

If the buyer does not have an FFL03 and its across state lines you must transfer via an FFL01 just like any other firearm sale.

The FFL03 makes transferring to like licensed collectors very convenient and is meant to ease interstate exchanges of eligible firearms.

You should not be selling as though you are a business. You are a collector, not a dealer. That said, this can be a gray area...you could buy a crate of Mosins and cherry pick some then sell the rest...no harm done. There is no stipulation of profit margins or anything from the ATF. Use your best judgment.
 
Last edited:
AS morcey said, it's not a dealer license, but you can certainly sell some. If, for instance, you ordered a couple of "hand pick" K11 carbines and chose the nicest of the 2 to keep, you can sell the other. But you cannot order 50 and sell 49, then do it again the next month with some other milsurp.

At this time, there still is not a hard and fast number on how many guns you can sell before being considered "engaged in the business", so just be prudent. Disposing of a handful each year won't raise any eyebrows.

Just be sure to log them properly in your A&D book. That is still required in a FTF private sale if it is a firearm you purchased with your C&R.
 
When you renew your C&R license, the ask you how many guns you bought and sold during the previous 3 years. In my case, I had bought about 70 and sold about 30.
 
Does anyone have any cases, any whatsoever, that they can reference where someone with a C&R got arrested and charged for dealing in firearms? Until the buying/selling conditions that trigger an illegal action is made more specific, it is pretty difficult to prove that an FFL03 purchased firearms with the intent to sell at a profit. And no where does it say that I cannot buy a gun and sell at a profit. Just because I have an FFL03 does not mean that every C&R that I sell needs to be sold at a loss or break even just so no one can say that I sold for a profit and confuse this with dealing in or running a firearms business. And the prosecution would be hard-pressed convicting someone of dealing in firearms even if they buy 50 guns and sell 49 each month. Who's to say that I don't want a larger pool of guns from which I can hand-pick my favorite? Who's to say that I do not have something going on in my life that requires money (wedding, baby, divorce, college, etc) and am selling my collection for funds? Am I required to sell those 49 at a loss or never sell them because doing so would constitute dealing in firearms and committing a crime? I think not. Now if you had a C&R and had a storefront where you began selling guns, that might trigger some red flags if someone reported you to the ATF.

Again, I challenge someone to find case law to help define the buy/sell limits of a C&R. I doubt there is much, if any, out there because the law is vague and the ATF knows that such charges will likely not stick in court.

With that being said, I do not advise pushing your luck. I use my FFL03 for collecting. I do not have any intent to sell anything that I buy with my FFL03. However, if my life circumstances change and I do need to sell my collection, I would sell for as much money as I could get for my guns and C&Rs can appreciate greatly even over the course of a year or two.

I think most of us know the spirit of an FFL03 and although we can likely get away with buying/selling guns outside of the designs of the FFL03, it does not make it right or legal and it is not advisable.
 
At this time, there still is not a hard and fast number on how many guns you can sell before being considered "engaged in the business", so just be prudent. Disposing of a handful each year won't raise any eyebrows.

Didn't the president issue an exec order defining "in the business" as 50 or more guns a year?
 
AFAIK, no one has put any specific numbers of sales on the definition of a dealer. (And if they did, it would be in a BATFE regulation, not a presidential order. (Have we got Executive Orders on the brain recently?) BATFE prefers to handle each case on an ad hoc basis so they have leeway to either hand out a quiet warning or really crack down, depending on the situation.

BTW, note that discussions of the actions permitted or prohibited under an 03 FFL always apply ONLY to C&R items. If a C&R item is not involved (say a modern Glock or Remington 700) the 03 FFL is irrelevant and it is as if it did not exist. So and 03 FFL holder can legally ship a WWI Luger or a WWII STEN* gun directly to another 03 FFL across state lines, or transfer it face to face to another 03 FFL holder anywhere in the U.S. unless state law says otherwise. But if the gun is that Glock, an 01 FFL has to be the recipient (though not the sender) of an interstate transfer.

I have heard that BATFE has asked distributors to notify them if an 03 FFL holder orders a quantity of the same gun, especially handguns. So anyone planning to buy a couple of thousand C&R items on his 03 FFL and peddle them to friends and neighbors might want to reconsider.

Jim

*After the usual NFA paperwork.

Jim
 
Last edited:
I just noticed the back of my C&R license says the holder is permitted to "buy or sell" C&R firearms. Notice I didn't say and. Sooooooo I knew it permitted me of course to have C&R stuff come directly to me, but I can do one or the other? Or does it actually permit both? I didn't know you could sell without a storefront and a different type of license, or can you? If I can, how would I set up the NICS and everything?
It is a misconception that a dealer must have a store front. I asked the ATF agent about it and he said that there are a lot of homebased dealers. However, there are several wholesale distributors who refuse to sell to a dealer without a store front.
 
"That is still required in a FTF private sale if it is a firearm you purchased with your C&R."

.....or any C&R Eligible firearm that you possess, whether you got it before or during the time you are a licensed 03.
 
"That is still required in a FTF private sale if it is a firearm you purchased with your C&R."

.....or any C&R Eligible firearm that you possess, whether you got it before or during the time you are a licensed 03.
jonnyc is right -

For example: if you bought a Mosin-Nagant (or any C&R eligible firearm) X-number of years ago and receive your 03FFL today, you are not required to enter it into your A&D Bound Book unless you want to, as long as it is stays in your possession. If you dispose of it in any way while holding the 03FFL, that Mosin must be entered as an acquisition (from your own private / prior collection) and as a disposition to whomever it went. The record keeping requirement applies to any C&R eligible firearm which you acquire or dispose in any way while holding the 03FFL.
 
Last time the ATF did a compliance on Les, I asked one of the agents what the rules were for selling a gun acquired with my C&R licence. I was told that C&R guns can only be sold to other C&R holders, and no one else. I was also told that the ATF wasn't too concerned with how many guns you BOUGHT, but rather how many you SOLD. If they saw a high volume of turnover they got suspicious.

I'm wondering about the agent's answer, because it is contrary to what I have heard about who you could sell a C&R gun to . I thought you could sell it to any one as long as local and Federal laws were followed. As long as you weren't making a business out of it.

Any thoughts/ new info?
 
Last time the ATF did a compliance on Les, I asked one of the agents what the rules were for selling a gun acquired with my C&R licence. I was told that C&R guns can only be sold to other C&R holders, and no one else. I was also told that the ATF wasn't too concerned with how many guns you BOUGHT, but rather how many you SOLD. If they saw a high volume of turnover they got suspicious.

I'm wondering about the agent's answer, because it is contrary to what I have heard about who you could sell a C&R gun to . I thought you could sell it to any one as long as local and Federal laws were followed. As long as you weren't making a business out of it.

Any thoughts/ new info?
That agent was wrong. You can sell to anyone not otherwise prohibited, just as you can any other firearm.
 
That's what I have always been told. I sure hope it is a wrong answer, because I have sold a couple to non- C&R holders!!
 
I've sold 5 guns to out of state FFL 03 holders with no problems. One was in Illinois. Just get the required license #,name,address, etc. and a piece of photo ID such as the DL or passport. Then have the info faxed, scanned or mailed to you, and enter the transaction in your bound book before shipping.

This was over a period of 9 years. You just have to be careful not to go overboard on the selling end.
 
The whole purpose of a C&R is to allow you to buy and sell eligible firearms. The distinction is that it is for the purpose of "collecting" those firearms not for the purpose of being in the business of selling firearms.
 
I'm not a collector.Just an old hunter.I have a 1958 Win. model 70,a 1956 Win. model 12 and a 1937 Win.model 37.I assume these are C&Rs and I can sell them FTF to anyone.Am I right?
 
giggitygiggity said:
Does anyone have any cases, any whatsoever, that they can reference where someone with a C&R got arrested and charged for dealing in firearms? Until the buying/selling conditions that trigger an illegal action is made more specific, it is pretty difficult to prove that an FFL03 purchased firearms with the intent to sell at a profit....
If the issue is dealing in firearms, having an FFL03 is irrelevant. As the ATF has said:
Does a license as a collector of curio or relic firearms authorize the collector to engage in the business of dealing in curios or relics?

No. A dealer’s license must be obtained to engage in the business of dealing in any firearms, including curios or relics.​

See also the applicable regulation at 27 CFR 478.41(d), emphasis added:
(d) The collector license provided by this part shall apply only to transactions related to a collector's activity in acquiring, holding or disposing of curios and relics. A collector's license does not authorize the collector to engage in a business required to be licensed under the Act or this part. Therefore, if the acquisitions and dispositions of curios and relics by a collector bring the collector within the definition of a manufacturer, importer, or dealer under this part, he shall qualify as such....

So any prosecution of dealing in firearms without a license will be based on the same factors whether or not one has an FFL03. And there have been plenty of successful prosecutions of persons for illegally dealing in firearms without a license.

Because of the way in which the applicable law defines a dealer in firearms, it is not clear when someone who believes himself to be a hobbyist firearms collector, or is otherwise engaged in what he believes to be routine gun trading, is engaging in the business of being a dealer and thereby risks federal prosecution for being an unlicensed gun dealer. There is no clear "bright line" test, so it's difficult for someone to know if or when he has crossed the line.

This has been the subject of an extensive discussion here. See this thread: What is "Dealing in Firearms Without a License?" . Note especially posts --

  • 10:
    Frank Ettin said:
    xxjumbojimboxx said:
    Is it illegal to buy a gun and sell it for profit?

    ....

    For some reason I think i saw something at one point that you needed an ffl to do that.
    Yes, at some point you need an FFL. But it's not necessarily all that clear where that point is.

    Under federal law, one needs an FFL to engage in the business of a dealer in firearms. "Engaged in the business" is defined at 18 USC 921(a)(21)(C), emphasis added:
    (21) The term “engaged in the business” means—

    (A)...

    (B) ...

    (C) as applied to a dealer in firearms, as defined in section 921 (a)(11)(A), a person who devotes time, attention, and labor to dealing in firearms as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the repetitive purchase and resale of firearms, but such term shall not include a person who makes occasional sales, exchanges, or purchases of firearms for the enhancement of a personal collection or for a hobby, or who sells all or part of his personal collection of firearms;...

    The operative concepts are (1) devoting time, attention and labor; (2) doing so regularly as a trade or business; (3) the repetitive purchase and resale of guns; and (4) intending to make money.

    "Livelihood" simply means:
    1: means of support or subsistence

    Nothing in the statutory definition of "engaged in the business" requires that it be one's only business or means of support. It could be a side business, a secondary business or one of several ways you have of bringing money into the household. What matters is that you're doing it regularly to make money. You don't even necessarily need to make a profit to be "engaged in business." People go into business all the time and wind up not making money. It's not that they're not engaged in business; it's just that they're not very good at it.

    But an occasional sale is not being "engaged in the business." Where is the the line between an occasional sale and the repetitive purchase and resale? That's not clear from the statutes, and I don't know if there's been any clarification judicially. I did a quick search for case law, and didn't immediately find anything. So I'll knock it off for tonight and try again tomorrow.

  • 13:
    Frank Ettin said:
    JohnKSa said:
    ...It only violates the law if this is being done as a business. The federal law specifically states that it must be done "as a regular course of trade" and that it involves the "repetitive purchase and resale of firearms". ...
    But the question is how the courts apply that. In that connection, I found the following:


    • The Third Circuit, in upholding a conviction of dealing in firearms without a license noted (U.S. v. Tyson, 653 F.3d 192 (3rd Cir., 2011), at 200-201, emphasis added):
      ...By the statute's terms, then, a defendant engages in the business of dealing in firearms when his principal motivation is economic (i.e., “obtaining livelihood” and “profit”) and he pursues this objective through the repetitive purchase and resale of firearms. Palmieri, 21 F.3d at 1268 (stating that “economic interests” are the “principal purpose,” and “repetitiveness” is “the modus operandi ”). Although the quantity and frequency of sales are obviously a central concern, so also are (1) the location of the sales, (2) the conditions under which the sales occurred, (3) the defendant's behavior before, during, and after the sales, (4) the price charged for the weapons and the characteristics of the firearms sold, and (5) the intent of the seller at the time of the sales. Id. (explaining that “the finder of fact must examine the intent of the actor and all circumstances surrounding the acts alleged to constitute engaging in business”). As is often the case in such analyses, the importance of any one of these considerations is subject to the idiosyncratic nature of the fact pattern presented...

    • And the Fifth Circuit noted (United States v. Brenner (5th. Cir., 2012, No. 11-50432, slip opinion), at 5-6, emphasis added):
      ...the jury must examine all circumstances surrounding the transaction, without the aid of a "bright-line rule". United States v. Palmieri, 21 F.3d 1265, 1269 (3d Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 513 U.S. 957 (1994). Relevant circumstances include: "the quantity and frequency of sales"; the "location of the sales"; "conditions under which the sales occurred"; "defendant's behavior before, during, and after the sales"; "the price charged"; "the characteristics of the firearms sold"; and, "the intent of the seller at the time of the sales". Tyson, 653 F.3d at 201.

    • The Sixth Circuit noted (United States v. Gray (6th Cir., 2012, No. 11-1305, slip opinion), at 8):
      ...However, "a defendant need not deal in firearms as his primary business for conviction." United States v. Manthey, 92 F. App'x 291, 297 (6th Cir. 2004)....

    • And in upholding Gray's conviction the Sixth Circuit also noted (Gray, at 8-9):
      ...We have previously held that evidence was sufficient to support a conviction under § 922(a)(1)(A) where it showed (1) that the defendant frequented flea markets and gun shows where he displayed and sold guns; (2) that the defendant offered to sell guns to confidential informants on multiple occasions and actually sold them three different guns on two different occasions; (3) and...that the defendant bought and sold guns for profit. See United States v. Orum, 106 F. App'x 972, 974 (6th Cir. 2004)...

    • In affirming a conviction of dealing in firearms without a license, the Ninth Circuit stated (U.S. v. Breier, 813 F.2d 212 (C.A.9 (Cal.), 1987), at 213-214, emphasis added):
      ...Courts have fashioned their own definitions of the term. For example, we have previously stated "that where transactions of sale, purchase or exchange of firearms are regularly entered into in expectation of profit, the conduct amounts to engaging in business." United States v. Van Buren, 593 F.2d 125, 126 (9th Cir.1979) (per curiam). In United States v. Wilmoth, 636 F.2d 123 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981), the Fifth Circuit stated that to prove the status of the accused as one engaged in the business of dealing in firearms, "the Government must show a greater degree of activity than the occasional sale of a hobbyist." Id. at 125. "It is enough to prove that the accused has guns on hand or is ready and able to procure them for the purpose of selling them from time to time to such persons as might be accepted as customers." Id.; accord United States v. Carter, 801 F.2d 78, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 657, 93 L.Ed.2d 712 (1986); United States v. Burgos, 720 F.2d 1520, 1527 n. 8 (11th Cir.1983)....

    Also, it's worthwhile to note that profits are taxable as short term or long term capital gains. But if one isn't engaged in a business some deductions ordinarily allowable as business expenses would not be allowable.

  • 21:
    Bubbles said:
    ATF is not going to be pinned down with a hard number as for whether or not buying/selling activity constitutes "dealing". However, we can look at prosecutions to find out where lines are drawn, though bear in mind that the charges filed are usually in addition to other charges (e.g. drug dealing, selling to prohibited persons, gang activity, etc).

    Nine guns in six months:
    http://www.atf.gov/press/releases/2011/05/052611-sf-salinas-man-sentenced-to-57-months-for-dealing-firearms-without-a-license.html

    Two years and at least 37 firearms:
    http://www.atf.gov/press/releases/2012/06/062012-no-jury-convicts-doyline-louisiana-man-of-dealing-firearms-without-a-license.html

    This one definitely crossed the line, the guy had many warnings both from ATF and local LE.
    http://www.atf.gov/press/releases/2012/02/022312-sea-former-police-officer-sentenced-to-prison-for-illegal-gun-sales-and-tax-crime.html
    What I found most telling about the press release was this statement:
    Some of the guns had been purchased by ALLOWAY from licensed sellers just days earlier – so they could not be considered part of a personal collection.

giggitygiggity said:
...Just because I have an FFL03 does not mean that every C&R that I sell needs to be sold at a loss or break even just so no one can say that I sold for a profit and confuse this with dealing in or running a firearms business.....
What having an FFL03 means in that regard is exactly nothing. If you are engaging in conduct for which the federal prosecutor thinks he can get you indicted and convicted, you will be prosecuted.

giggitygiggity said:
...And the prosecution would be hard-pressed convicting someone of dealing in firearms even if they buy 50 guns and sell 49 each month.....
How would you know?

giggitygiggity said:
...Who's to say that I don't want a larger pool of guns from which I can hand-pick my favorite? Who's to say that I do not have something going on in my life that requires money....
Perhaps the jury at your trial.

giggitygiggity said:
....I challenge someone to find case law to help define the buy/sell limits of a C&R....
An FFL03 is irrelevant, so the case law I cited would be applicable.

giggitygiggity said:
...because the law is vague and the ATF knows that such charges will likely not stick in court....
And that is simply not true. There have been successful prosecutions for dealing without a license.
 
3212 said:
I'm not a collector.Just an old hunter.I have a 1958 Win. model 70,a 1956 Win. model 12 and a 1937 Win.model 37.I assume these are C&Rs and I can sell them FTF to anyone.Am I right?
Not necessarily.

First, it will be a question of state law. While the laws of most States require no formalities when firearms are transferred between residents, some do regulate private sales.

Second, under federal law you can not transfer a gun without an FFL to anyone who you know or have reasonable cause to believe is not a resident of your State, or to anyone ever who you know or have reasonable cause to believe is prohibited under 18 USC 922(g) from possessing a gun.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top