Can I overnight my handgun to myself?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just check the gun-- thats the one thing the airline is not going to lose -- its cheaper, easier & you don't have to be a law professor to know if its Legal.
 
Hmm... I wonder if, pretty soon, there will be no way to move firearms interstate... no carriers... no personal interstate carrying.
 
Thats the day I immigrate to Switzerland -- It would take a LONG time to become a citizen, but I wouldn't live here anymore.
 
natman said:
It's the FedEx part. They don't ship handguns. If you shipped a handgun to yourself UPS it would be OK.
http://fedex.com/us/service-guide/terms/express-ground/index.html

Their terms of service have changed - it used to be long guns could go by FEDEX ground (if going to an FFL) and only handguns were required to go by overnight... that is no longer the case:

You're right, the terms have changed. I looked up FedEx handgun shipping less than a month ago and back then they contained an additional sentence at the end:

"FedEx Ground will not accept for transport handguns, assembled or disassembled."

but it's gone now. Mea culpa.
 
natman
You're right, the terms have changed. I looked up FedEx handgun shipping less than a month ago and back then they contained an additional sentence at the end:

"FedEx Ground will not accept for transport handguns, assembled or disassembled."

but it's gone now. Mea culpa.

Nope, that statement is still there right at the bottom of the Ground tariff.
It's been many years since fedEx allowed handguns to go Ground.
 
Do FedEx and UPS X-ray packages?

No, they do not have the time

Then the only worry, until if/when they start X-raying, is loss of insurance coverage. If packed well there's very little chance, in most cases, that a typical firearm will be damaged in shipment. So, now it's only package "loss" that we must concern ourselves with and that's pretty rare. I'm sure it's illegal to mislabel a package contents and collect insurance on a lost shipment (insurance fraud). So, I would just package extremely well (double box) and forego the insurance. If lost then I'll pay out of pocket. But I'd make darned sure I have confirmation of delivery.
 
Last edited:
The easiest and cheapest way ($0) to travel with a handgun when you are flying is to take it in your checked luggage. The only downside is that you'll to wait for the luggage to be unloaded when you arrive.

Just to be clear, most airlines are charging checked baggage fees these days, so it might cost you $20 each way. Still cheaper than overnight shipping.
 
I could be wrong here but wouldn't UPS have a list of FFLs in their data base? Considering the number of firearms distributors and gun shops that use them to move firearms around the county it would seem logical that they have a "list" somewhere in their system. Now to the quseton at hand buy a nice sturdy handgun case and a set of locks and take it with you to FL.
 
(partial quote) I could be wrong here but wouldn't UPS have a list of FFLs in their data base?

Probably, but unless they open or X-ray the package they have no way of knowing what's in the box. FFLs receive non-firearm shipments all the time such as lights, lasers, magazines, barrels, etc.
 
Tuffpak

I just picked up one of these for my next SD hunt. It will let me pack everything, including my shotguns, gear and clothing in one checked bag which, for now, is still free.

http://www.nalpak.com/Tuffpak-1050-Gun-Case-w-TSA-Locking-System

It's not the most attractive thing around but it sure looks like it will work nicely for this sort of trip. I've not looked but perhaps they make something similar for handguns.
 
Tuffpack

I still don't get why luggage companies are confused about the TSA rules. You do NOT use a TSA-accessible lock when checking firearms!
 
I still don't get why luggage companies are confused about the TSA rules. You do NOT use a TSA-accessible lock when checking firearms!
It's alright to state the written rules but really, until you show up in front of a particular TSA agent on a particular day in a particular airport, you may encounter variations on what they believe is the correct rule.

Almost 12 months ago the same group headed to SD. About half believed a TSA lock was needed, the other a non-TSA lock. All gear and travelers arrived intact.

If it's confusing it's ultimately because TSA made it so, probably because they are a relatively new agency who faced a rather new problem around 10 years ago and have been making rules on the fly, so to speak.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top