Cartridge weight - 17HMR, Quest for MOA

Status
Not open for further replies.

TEC

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2009
Messages
325
I have a relatively new CZ-452 Varmint 17HMR, now scoped with Bushnell 6-18X50mm and have gone through the ritual of shooting 1, cleaning, shooting 1, cleaning etc. I now have two sessions shooting off a front rest, rear bag at 100 yards, by laser and came dangerously close to my goal of 2 x 5-round groups at MOA accuracy. .095", 1.195", .093" and 1.150" using a optical gauge and digital calipers. This with Remington 17 gr. Accuutip-V Boat tail ammo. You have no doubt already figured out I am geeky about the techno end of shooting.

Not too long ago, I got really anal about shooting accuracy with my air rifles and purchased a GemPro jeweler's digital scale which measures to the nearest 0.05 grains to weigh and sort pellets for target shooting -- another stort . . .

I received a brick of 500 Rem 17 gr. Accutip-V BT and out of curiosity, precisely weighed 100 cartridges with weights, average, and distribution attached.

I understand that the case, primer, powder charge, and bullet weight all contribute to the total cartridge weight. But that said, all other things equal, does it make sense to choose 5 rounds of exactly the same weight to attempt to improve the 5-shot groupings, or is this just a boondoggle? With average cartridge weight, 40.05 gr, std dev 0.49%, or 2 std devs of just under 1% by weight.

Sorted the rounds by 5's in groups from 39.95 gr through 40.30 gr, dropped them back in the plastic racks and set aside the odds and left overs of less than 5-shot groups, so that I now have 16 x 5-round cartridge groups that weigh the same within 0.05 grains tolerance. Plan to shoot again over the July 4th weekend, but I have no idea whether this, compared to wind conditions and my general shooting ability will make any difference at all.

Do any of you knowledgeable folks, perhaps those who carefully hand load your own target rounds have any insights or comments?

PS: I have an F1 Chrony - chronograph I use for air rifle / pellets, but I kind of doubt it will be of any use at muzzle velocities arond 2500 fps. Anyone know?
 

Attachments

  • Picture 3.png
    Picture 3.png
    21.6 KB · Views: 7
Last edited:
I've heard of people sorting .22lr by weight for match shooting and it seems the same would apply for your ammo. Give it a try and let us know how it works.
 
TEC: What you are doing is all well and good and should certainly help in your quest for MOA accuracy. But logic dictates that since this is a rim fire cartridge and you have no way to determine if it is actual bullet weight that differs or another parameter such as charge weight, primer compound, or actual case weight that differs; something completely out of your control. Why not try different brands of ammo instead, since most rimfire rifles seem to perfer one brand over another. JMHO. :)
 
After looking at your graph, you would expect the cartridges within 2 SD's of the mean to perform the most consistently. Since the weight is an aggregate number, I'm not sure that choosing five in this range is any more accurate than choosing five random cartridges. This sounds like it's time for an experiment with overall weight, rim thickness, and control groups. I might have to try this with my 22LR. Knowing me, I'd need someone else to load the magazines to make sure that I didn't skew the results.
 
The Chrony F1 is rated all the way to 7000 fps. I had some 55 grain .243 Win bullets cross my F1 at over 4000 fps with no problems. Stay back far enough from the unit while shooting to help reduce errors (10-15 feet), make sure to use the sky screens in clear sky conditions, and absolutely make sure that it's completely open to help keep it as accurate as possible.
 
As an aside:

How do you like that Bushnell 6-18X50 scope? Can you see .17 bullet holes in the black with it at 100 yards?

You might consider sorting by rim thickness too.
Yep, the .22 BR folks do that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top