Steel Horse Rider lamented,
My problem with Brophy is with the bicycle law he sponsored that requires motor vehicles to give bicyclists at least 3' when passing them without any responsibility on the part of the bicyclists to stay on the shoulder single file. That is not the type of judgement I want in a governor.
Once again, Ryanxia said,
I know it's hard to find someone that you agree with on everything but put you have to think about what's really important. Freedom or all the other crap? Get behind a candidate and get him in. Otherwise, divided you will fall.
Ryanxia's words should be taken to heart.
That's why I'm getting to the point where I don't care all that much about "other issues." I just want to know where a candidate stands on individual freedom versus statism. And my "drop test" on this is gradually becoming their actual stance on firearms issues.
Now I know a lot of votes have to be traded back and forth, so it's possible for "your" candidate to cast votes (and join in sponsoring bills) on minor issues with which you disagree. At other times, a politician may
apparently vote against his conscience knowing full well that the bill has no chance of gettting through either the other house or the veto power of the executive, perhaps as part of another trade. Or, lamentably, to placate a bunch of screaming people on the steps of the Capitol Building.
So, while politics ain't that simple, I am still tending toward becoming a one-issue voter, and I come across that way in public just to "push" my position on firearms.
As I said, I don't like a lot of positions the NRA takes, nor on the positions of some other groups of which I am a member, but that doesn't mean I'm going to abandon them and withdraw support.
By the way, I said Brophy is my
current favorite. However, I don't know for whom I'd actually be voting the day I seal my ballot in its envelope.
Time will tell.
Terry