The parameters dictate a bigger bullet and case than a 22 caliber; 308 case powder capacity really stretches the upper limit of his target range.
The more I read his needs for the ranges indicated leads me to look at a 30-06 case; more than likely with a bullet with a minimum of a 0.500+ B.C.
I'm thinking a 280 AI is needed to make this a legitimate contender.
Most EVERY mentioned caliber (except the beloved HORNET) is good out to 500 YARDS.
My first centerfire was a 22 hornet, but I know it is no 300+ yard caliber with the lightweight bullet required to work good.
Purchasing a rifle in a over matched caliber is not in the best interest of fiscal restraints.
The poor guy will spend 2X as much just getting to the 700 yard mark.
true, but the words "saiga" and "benchrest" cannot be used in the same sentence. I think there may even be a law against it...loland you can get a Saiga chambered in either of those calibers n.i.b. for less than $400
This could be real easy or real hard...how big is the target?To become "one of the family" you have to hit the 600 target 8/10 times.
Why is it dumb? It's an excellent scope. Seems kinda silly that they supposedly have all this knowledge and you have to ask about something as basic as caliber selection on the internet. I don't know how old you are but if you want to get into this "club", if your 22-250 is a decent quality rifle, I'd slap the vx-3l on it and start practicing. A decent quality rifle with that scope will get the job done as well as anything at 600. Other calibers are better as ranges get farther than that, but plenty of folks shoot a 223 out to 600 just fine which shoots the same bullet several hundred fps slower.I was going to try to use the Leupold VX-3L off my .22-250 at first. The Leupold VX-3L is just dumb on the .22-250 and my dad laughs at me when I use
All horrible choices for hitting a 6" target at 600 yards. I'm not saying it couldn't be done, but if the guys goal is to hit a 6" steel target at 600, and he has easy access to targets out to 2500 yards, these choices are ill suited at best. I'd be willing to bet against david tubb hitting a 6" target at 600 yards with an AK in 7.62x39.8x57 mauser and 7.62x54 russian bolt action rifles. Assuming you are blasting surplus. Then Russian 5.45 followed by 7.62x39, then .223 as far as ammo prices. The rifles are Mosin Nagant by far the cheapest. Mausers are getting hard to find good surplus so prices are getting out of hand. Then the AK followed by about everything else.
Well the bright side is, when you can hit a 6" target at 600 8 out of 10 times, you'll likely no longer need their helpThe reason I have to ask here is because they won't help me at all until I get the 8/10.
rangerruck WOW!!! that just narrowed things up quite a bit; you need speed and good b.c.'s from bullets- I would eliminate everything else, and look for something between 6 and 7mm bullets, to give you the best chance.
You are shooting for MOA out to 600 yds... that will be a challenge, so call
back, with pics, and let us know how it goes.
223 without question. You might be able to save a few pennies on powder shooting 22 Hornet if you reload exclusively, but the huge difference in factory ammo prices makes the 223 the clear winner.
JustinL You have time to fire 1500 rounds per week? Assuming you sleep 8h per night that averages 1 shot every 5 minutes or so.