Choice of ammo for self defense?

Status
Not open for further replies.

BoilerUP

Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
700
Location
Clark Co, IN
Wondering what loading everyone likes in their home defense/carry/issue handgun. I'm specifically looking for 9mm, .40SW, and .38 Spec (for a Detective Special) loadings.

I know a couple federal agencies issue the 165gr Speer Gold Dot for .40 S&W...but I suppose I'm most interested in first or second-hand experience with terminal effects from LEOs or those who have had to use their weapon.

I know a couple ball rounds properly placed would ruin the day of any bad guy, but considering the marginal cost increase for quality ammunition and what would be at stake in a true defense situation I want to know what the professionals and experts use.

Thanks!
 
no personal having to shoot someone experience but i can give second hand from my LE guys (im a trainer for a PD).

9mm - Golden Sabers and Gold Dots are the round of choice here. Not sure of weight. A shooting some time back with a 9mm sub gun moved the dept to adopt .45 subs.

.40 - 165 gr gold dots. these have stopped quite a few BGs and one rogue cow!

.38 spl - no idea. i would search the forums. but personally in a snubbie i shoot the 135 gr winchester sxt or the 135 gr gold dots. its just what most of my guys carry in their BUGs. a few guys also carry a heavier 200 gr swc and like it. most of these are the old timers who swore by it back then and have used it with effectiveness.

hope this helps!
 
Short of having a shotgun for your primary home defense weapon, all these calibers will be adequate for self defense, with any of the ammunition companies' JHP loads.

I suggest you use a shotgun for home defense. For concealed carry, I use 9mm Federal.
 
Use enough gun

Myself I perfer 10 mm or 45 ACP, generally you don't have to worry about stopping what you hit with those calibures. IMHO

me26245
 
I always use Winchester Silvertips... Most of the time, I can get a better price for those and I get a box of 50, or worst case the price is approx the same and I still get a box of 50 instead of 20...
 
I was told by an old police officer that if you were to load a wadcutter backwards in a .357 mag it would not exit a person within 20'.

I think he tested it on a deer with a gutshot.
 
I'm not sure this thread belongs in S&T, but anyway...

These days I'm carrying Buffalo Bore .45 Colt 255 gr. LSWC, also known as the Keith bullet. It might be excessive for some situations, but I find that to be comforting. Also, nobody wants to stare down the barrel of a Peacemaker.
 
I was a firearms instructor for a federal agency. It seems to me that ammo purchases are more to spread the wealth (rotate supplier) than finding the "best" ammo. The best ammo for you would be any quality hollowpoint that feeds best and gives you reasonable accuracy.

ps There is no magic bullet.
 
Last edited:
In, .40, I like 180 gr Hornady XTPs for the summer, 180 gr Remington Golden Sabers for the winter. If I had to pick just one for year round, it'd be the Remingtons.
 
Any name-brand hollowpoint will work. Use what feeds well.

In my case, if I could afford to keep my mags full of them, I would stick with Gold Dots or Federal HST, but that's me.

Currently, I'm carrying Winchester's Ranger Bonded. Less than half the price of Gold Dots, and their advertised terminal ballistics are close enough to them that I feel a good hit's a good hit.
 
any modern hollowpoint will do the job as others have stated.

I personally like 147 regular pressure or 124 +p in Federal HST.

I have know expierience with .38 or 40 caliber but again, modern hollowpoint will do you right.

Check out www.ammunitiontogo.com for good prices and Law Enforcement Restricted ammo. ( restrictions are placed on ammo by the company's and it's fully legal for a citizen to use unless your in NJ then no hollowpoints.)
 
In my XD-40, I use 165 gr Gold Dot's. I don't have a 9mm, but I'd go for the 124 gr Gold Dot in that. 38 spl, 135 gr Gold Dot.:D
 
I am of the school of use what works. Go to the range with all the different brands you can get your hands on. Shoot, shoot, and shoot some More and keep records. There are some big benefits of this method. The biggest one being you get to enjoy your firearms.
I here lots of complaining about ammo prices but my goodness we spend hundreds even thousands on our guns and we can't spend a hundred on finding what to feed them so they run reliable and shoot straight. Now I will get off my box!
I run Federal Premium Hydro-shok 230gr. In my 45 and 158Gr in both 357's. I carry a 3" 1911, my wife carry's my snub 357(7 shot 2" snub its a brick so I don't carry it sob no more but it is just fine for her purse, even if she don't shoot a bg with it she can crack a skull with it if she swings it at him. We have even done a little training with her and purse on how to get a good swing with it) and I keep a Henry Big Boy on the wall in the living room(a bit of leather some beads, feathers and a couple dream catchers and nobody ever says anything about the rifle hanging on the wall). I have tried some of Hornady TAP it works beautiful in the 357's but I am only able to get the 45 in 230gr. +P and I have found that the +P is just to snappy for the little 3" ultra carry. I don't feel the few fps I get from the +P is not worth the added stress it puts on me or my gun.
I run Federal I trust Federal and that is what I feel is the most important in a self defense ammo TRUST!!!
 
Unless you are *%&$ good or half way decent with a handgun, if not, USE a shotgun with either 00 or 000 buckshot or slugs cause that`s what will be required to stop that ^%#%$@# home invader. attacker/murderer/ burglar.
 
All of the following loads meet the FBI standardized protocols for law enforcement ammunition by unbias testing. These standards emphasis adequate penetation and expansion not only on a naked subject, but a subject that must be shot through heavy clothing or barriers. In twenty years this proven testing method and standardization has yet to be proven wrong in the field. If you don't see a particular load on this list, it likely didn't pass testing:

9 mm:
Barnes XPB 105 & 115gr JHP (copper bullet)
Federal Tactical Bonded 124gr+P JHP (LE9T1)
Speer Gold Dot 124gr+P JHP
Winchester Ranger-T 124gr+P JHP (RA9124TP)
Winchester Partition Gold 124gr JHP (RA91P)
Winchester Ranger-T 127gr+P+ JHP (RA9TA)
Federal Tactical Bonded 135gr+P JHP (LE9T5)
Federal HST 147gr JHP (P9HST2)
Remington Golden Saber 147gr JHP (GS9MMC)
Speer Gold Dot 147gr JHP
Winchester Ranger-T 147gr JHP (RA9T)
Winchester Ranger Bonded 147gr JHP (RA9B/Q4364) FBI LOAD

.40 S&W:
Barnes XPB 140 & 155gr JHP (copper bullet)
Speer Gold Dot 155gr JHP
Federal Tactical Bonded 165gr JHP (LE40T3)
Winchester Ranger-T 165gr JHP (RA40TA)
Winchester Partition Gold 165gr JHP (RA401P)
Federal HST 180gr JHP (P40HST1)
Federal Tactical Bonded 180gr JHP (LE40T1)
Remington Golden Saber 180gr JHP (GS40SWB)
Speer Gold Dot 180gr JHP
Winchester Ranger-T 180gr JHP (RA40T)
Winchester Ranger Bonded 180gr JHP (Q4355) FBI LOAD

.45 ACP:
Barnes XPB 185gr JHP (copper bullet)
Federal HST 230gr JHP (P45HST2)
Federal HST 230gr+P JHP (P45HST1)
Federal Tactical Bonded 230gr+P JHP (LE45T1)
Speer Gold Dot 230 gr JHP
Winchester Ranger-T 230gr JHP (RA45T)
Winchester Ranger-T 230gr+P JHP (RA45TP)


Notice that the lighter bullet weights don't do as well. This is due to less mass and more important reduced bullet sectional density. Sectional density is in lay terms the mass concentration over a bullet relative to its diamter. Modernized heavier weight bullets(which also have greater sectional density) perform better in simulated and real life scenarios that lighter loads do.

For duty I use Federal Tactical Bonded .40S&W 180gr. Gold Dots are usually a pretty sure bet. Remington Golden Sabers have a notorious history of unreliable results which is why you only see it here in heavier bullet weights.
 
Last edited:
Marcus,

Thanks for the list! Where did you source that from?

I suppose I should have been more clear in my original post that I was really curious what LE agencies were issuing...or what those here who have had to use their weapon in anger experienced with a particular load.
 
BoilerUp,

The list comes from Tactical Forums in which you must be a member to access. The testing was performed in part by the FBI and the Firearms Institute. Most LE agencies use ammo from the big three......Federal, Speer, and Winchester. They also tend to favor more modern bonded bullets now days which hold together better while shooting through substances. The best bonded loads are Federal Tactical Bonded and Winchester Ranger Bonded. Speer Gold Dots also come close, but they don't expand quite as well as the Fed and Win loads. I wouldn't feel undergunned with anything on the list above though.
 
I live in PUllman WA - SE WA St. - the City as well as
WSU cops carry Glock 17 with Ranger ammo I forgot to ask
what bullet weight. The Whitman County Sheriffs carry
Kimber 1911s in .45 ACP.

The local shops sell the Speer Gold Dot JHPs for 9MM Luger
at $18.95. About every other month I order Double Tap in 9mm
Luger, .38 Special +P and .45 ACP.

I keep the mags for my CZ 75B with the Double tap
147 Gr. Speer Gold Dot @ 1,135 FPS - 50 rds at $27.95/50 rds.

My Model 60 3" Bbl. .357 Mag. is fed DT .38 Special +P @
1,175 FPS. same price as their 9mm luger.

The 1911 gets .45 ACP Speer GD 200 gr. 1,125 FPS
- 50 rds for $33.

or WWB JHPs for 9mm or .45 ACP - I can always load the
little 60 with some .357 Mag. 125/140 gr. Hornady XTP

Oh, the 625 .45 ACP/.45 AUto RIm has a cylinder full of
225 gr. Barnes XPB HPs in .45 AR @ 900+ FPS.

Randall
 
Marcus L. said:
All of the following loads meet the FBI standardized protocols for law enforcement ammunition by unbias testing. These standards emphasis adequate penetation and expansion not only on a naked subject, but a subject that must be shot through heavy clothing or barriers. In twenty years this proven testing method and standardization has yet to be proven wrong in the field. If you don't see a particular load on this list, it likely didn't pass testing:

9 mm:
Barnes XPB 105 & 115gr JHP (copper bullet)
Federal Tactical Bonded 124gr+P JHP (LE9T1)
Speer Gold Dot 124gr+P JHP
Winchester Ranger-T 124gr+P JHP (RA9124TP)
Winchester Partition Gold 124gr JHP (RA91P)
Winchester Ranger-T 127gr+P+ JHP (RA9TA)
Federal Tactical Bonded 135gr+P JHP (LE9T5)
Federal HST 147gr JHP (P9HST2)
Remington Golden Saber 147gr JHP (GS9MMC)
Speer Gold Dot 147gr JHP
Winchester Ranger-T 147gr JHP (RA9T)
Winchester Ranger Bonded 147gr JHP (RA9B/Q4364) FBI LOAD

.40 S&W:
Barnes XPB 140 & 155gr JHP (copper bullet)
Speer Gold Dot 155gr JHP
Federal Tactical Bonded 165gr JHP (LE40T3)
Winchester Ranger-T 165gr JHP (RA40TA)
Winchester Partition Gold 165gr JHP (RA401P)
Federal HST 180gr JHP (P40HST1)
Federal Tactical Bonded 180gr JHP (LE40T1)
Remington Golden Saber 180gr JHP (GS40SWB)
Speer Gold Dot 180gr JHP
Winchester Ranger-T 180gr JHP (RA40T)
Winchester Ranger Bonded 180gr JHP (Q4355) FBI LOAD

.45 ACP:
Barnes XPB 185gr JHP (copper bullet)
Federal HST 230gr JHP (P45HST2)
Federal HST 230gr+P JHP (P45HST1)
Federal Tactical Bonded 230gr+P JHP (LE45T1)
Speer Gold Dot 230 gr JHP
Winchester Ranger-T 230gr JHP (RA45T)
Winchester Ranger-T 230gr+P JHP (RA45TP)


Notice that the lighter bullet weights don't do as well. This is due to less mass and more important reduced bullet sectional density. Sectional density is in lay terms the mass concentration over a bullet relative to its diameter. Modernized heavier weight bullets(which also have greater sectional density) perform better in simulated and real life scenarios that lighter loads do.

This ^

Forget about Hydra-Shok, Silvertips and "specialty loads" like Glaser, Magsafe and Extreme Shock..

Please view the link for proper self-defense ammunition selection from the experts:
http://ammo.ar15.com/project/Self_Defense_Ammo_FAQ/index.htm

BoilerUP said:
Marcus,

Thanks for the list! Where did you source that from?

I suppose I should have been more clear in my original post that I was really curious what LE agencies were issuing...or what those here who have had to use their weapon in anger experienced with a particular load.
See above link
 
What I use:

9x19mm - Winchester White Box 147gr. JHPs from Walmart. Accurate, reliable, with excellent penetration and expansion.

.38Special/.357Magnum - .38Special Federal 158gr. LSWC-HPs +P

.40S&W - Aguila 95gr. IQs and Winchester 155gr. Ranger JHPs.

.44Special/.44Magnum - .44Special CCI Blazer 200gr. Gold Dot JHPs and Federal .44Special 200gr. LSWC-HPs

.45acp - Aguila 117gr. IQs and Hornady 200gr. TAP JHPs
 
KG,

The compiled data presented on most of that page comes from the works and opinions of Dr. Martin Fackler, Dr. Gary Roberts, Duncan MacPherson, Shawn Dodson, and others. These are the experts that the Department of Defense, the National Defense Industrial Association, the FBI, and numerous other research facilities and LE/military training organizations listen to before they listen to anyone else. In other words, they know what they are talking about.

The comment on .45acp 4" barrels is indeed a very valid statement considering the nature of the .45acp cartridge. Larger charges require longer barrel lengths in order to burn a sufficient amount of powder inside the barrel to be of any benefit. In shorter barrels an excessive amount of powder is burned after leaving the muzzle which is wasted energy and leads to excessive muzzle flash and blast. This also results in significant performance loss and unreliable expansion performance. This is the same problem you get in rifle cartridges such as the 7.62 NATO. Virtually all modern .45acp loads are loaded and optimized around the 5" barrel standard and significant deviation below that standard leads to performance problems. The same thing occurs with the 9mm and .40S&W if you deviate too far below the 4" barrel standard.

In addition to bullet performance, the author also refers to "hard use" as just that....hard use. A shorter barrel also means a shorter slide. A shorter slide means less slide mass which is the best of recoil absorbers. A good quality 5" 1911 will last up to around 100k rounds. Most shortened models average only 20k-30k rounds. Increased slide velocity and dependence on recoil spring strength takes its toll on the frame and the frame internals. Breaking parts due to metal fatigue with increased pounding is a very real situation with agencies using pistols with lighter slide mass. I know, I spent several years with the Department of Interior servicing several hundred Sigs, 1911s, Glocks, and H&Ks.
 
Last edited:
KG,

The AR15.com page that was linked is not a page created by the IWBA, or the Firearms Institute. Therefore, none of the names I listed are responsible for it and the inclusion or exclusion of information on that page does not effect the credibility of the quoted and referenced persons. The Firearms Tactical page is compiled by Shawn Dodson and contains cited reading material. Much of that material is now archived and no longer updated. The Tactical Forums boards are now the updated reference pages for terminal effects and equipment critique for law enforcement and military personel. The information I take from it a summation of the pertinent material to address a specific question.....not a complete education.

Most of us on Tactical Forums that do the reading, seek out additional professional training, and attend LE and military weapons demonstrations sometimes forget that many do not read and collectively take in the "big picture". You can believe what you wish as well KG, however if you haven't looked deeper into the matter other than snipits you find on the internet then you are clearly limited to a small scope of information or misinformation.

Can you trust Speer shortbarrel?.....yes. Keep in mind, the quote was from Dr. Roberts in 2002 before Speer shortbarrel existed. It was the very testing performed by the IWBA that showed ammunition failures when fired from short barrels that probably resulted in the creation of Speer Shortbarrel. Speer has been consulted IWBA members for years on ammunition testing. Prior to the 1987 FBI Wound Ballistics Workshop the industry tested their ammunition in water tanks which resulted in poor field performance. Once the failures of the industry's products were exposed by the FBI, it set a trend in development and testing. Just a few of the many examples of how these "experts" have influenced and continue to influence the direction of the arms market. However, reduced durability of short slide .45acps is a documented fact at the armories at FLETC and Quantico which Dr. Roberts was referring to when it comes to "hard use".
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top