• You are using the old High Contrast theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

City of Manassas, VA Gun Owners are "Assclowns"

Status
Not open for further replies.
"The officers told them to leave or they'd find a reason to arrest them"
i can't find that reference, can you help me out?
Yup, it's in the original VCDL story. Certainly it's logically possible the cops didn't coerce the Manassas Six in such a fashion, but if the owner didn't ask them to leave, then that will certainly come out in the open soon I'd think.

If Tony's manager or owner didn't ask them to leave, and they didn't want to leave, and they were forced to under duress by the LEOs in question...that's a big deal.
 
Just finished off a year's work at GD in Woodbridge, but had my apartment out in Manassas.

Thought that it might be better than Woodbridge in terms of population, but was wrong.

The one thing that I did right, prior to transitioning down there as a consultant, was to get my non resident CCW.


My wife never visited there, since I thought it unsafe for her.

You're welcome to that pit, if you live there, and I hope that the rest of
VA is a better world, since I've thought well of Mr. Lee over the years, and I
hate to think that that mess is his legacy.
 
Posted for information purposes.

Before we get to the information I would like to STRESS ONE THING MOST STRONGLY. If you choose to address questions or comments to the email address below can we PLEASE make sure they are well thought out, include factual information and are POLITE.

We can be firm, we can be angry, but we must take the high road, WE must remain polite.

Okay that's all I can say on it.

Manassas City, VA Police Department
http://www.manassascity.org/index.asp?NID=17
John J. Skinner, Chief of Police: [email protected].

Manassas City, VA - Mayor and City Council
http://www.manassascity.org/index.asp?nid=37

Mayor, Douglas S. Waldro Home: 703-257-8213
Vice Mayor, Harry J. (Hal) Parrish II Home: 703-368-3121
 
Sounds to me like it was a troll, albeit an organized one. Maybe even the caller is in on it. At first he asks if it's legal, then he says he knows it is, and he goes on to query about what they're going to do about it?

The cops were probably set up, and walked into it.

And who cares what they said in their e-mails? E-mails are not posting in a public forum. And who knows how they really responded to the officers one they were on the scene. Hey, if he got called out to a restaurant, and there were guys carrying weapons, legal or not, and he didn't do a warrant check, then he'd be in deep trouble from the same crowd for not doing the job if they turned out to be felons.

Besides, since 9/11, IIRC, you have to produce ID if a cop asks for it. Not an issue.
 
Besides, since 9/11, IIRC, you have to produce ID if a cop asks for it. Not an issue.
.

That is an incorrect statement. Although it might not be the most advisable course of action, if you are doing nothing illegal, and the officer is just talking to you (asking for ID), and the officer is not detaining you (telling you that you're under arrest), then you can just keep walking and ignore the officer if you so choose.
 
OSS wrote:

That is an incorrect statement. Although it might not be the most advisable course of action, if you are doing nothing illegal, and the officer is just talking to you (asking for ID), and the officer is not detaining you (telling you that you're under arrest), then you can just keep walking and ignore the officer if you so choose.

either way it appears there was legal probable cause to stop them and thus if there exists legal reason for a stop then there exists legal reason for the officers to ask for identification.
 
Sounds to me like it was a troll, albeit an organized one. Maybe even the caller is in on it. At first he asks if it's legal, then he says he knows it is, and he goes on to query about what they're going to do about it?

The cops were probably set up, and walked into it.

Stretchman,
When I read this it sounds like you are saying that you believe the VCDL set this whole thing up to "test" the police. Is this, in fact what you are saying? If so I would ask that you please do a little more research into the VCDL, what it is trying to accomplish and what its modus operandi has been in the past.

And who cares what they said in their e-mails? E-mails are not posting in a public forum.
First off, where I work we are reminded every month that we shouldn't put anything in an email that we wouldn't put on a billboard by the side of the road. My employer stresses HARD that even internal-use email could become public at the drop of a hat. Anyone who thinks otherwise is not being smart.

Secondly, I care what they said in their email. They were on the job and that -should- mean professional. Showing this kind of slack and bad attitude when they think nobody is looking is evidence of deeper rot in the system. If they are behaving that way on a city computer system, which is (obviously) subject to review they are really being pretty stupid and are setting themselves up for, at minimum, an internal review.

And who knows how they really responded to the officers one they were on the scene. Hey, if he got called out to a restaurant, and there were guys carrying weapons, legal or not, and he didn't do a warrant check, then he'd be in deep trouble from the same crowd for not doing the job if they turned out to be felons.

Your writing is vague but I'm guessing by context that the first "they" means the VCDL members. Now I don't personally know everyone involved but for the ones I do know we are NOT talking about a group of reactionary hotheads. As for requesting ID and doing a warrant check, you are wrong. In point of fact I, as a rookie cop, was in a similar situation in Alexandria a number of years ago and got my A$$ chewed off for pressing a citizen who was open carrying legally.

Having listened to the dispatch call I don't fault the officers for responding en-masse as the only info they had was "six-men with guns". The dispatcher should have been much more clear in describing the situation as she knew it. However once they arrived and saw that no laws were being broken they should have pulled back immediately. Maybe sit in the parking lot and observe for a while but there was really no cause to even engage the VCDL members in conversation.

Besides, since 9/11, IIRC, you have to produce ID if a cop asks for it. Not an issue.

That is incorrect. We don't (at least not yet, some people are trying) live in a society where we must produce papers simply at the whim of law enforcement. You may feel comfortable with random, unsupported, violation of your fourth amendment rights, I sure don't because it's an extremely slippery slope.
 
either way it appears there was legal probable cause to stop them and thus if there exists legal reason for a stop then there exists legal reason for the officers to ask for identification.

Spreadfire,
Can you clearly and plainly spell out what you think the legal probable cause was?

As far as I can see in this entire incident the "manassas seven" as people are starting to call them, were peacefully eating dinner in a public resturant.

People keep trying to make a case about them wearing sidearms somehow justifying police action but here in Virginia open carry is perfectly legal and is no more cause for police action than wearing cowboy boots or a biker jacket with chains.
 
This has come to be repetitions of some variant of "But wasn't there cause...?" and then a repeat that, no, there wasn't.

When there is some fact as to any future legal actions, start again.

Art
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top