To all those who said the XCR is "better" than the FN-SCAR: In what way is it better? Do you guys have experience with the civvie FN-SCAR to be able to compare the two?
I find it hard to believe that the FN-SCAR is inferior to the XCR just by looking at its specs on paper.
I have only fondled the civi SCAR, and have not dissassembled it. My initial opinions on the design are based on assumptions that the internals on the civi version mirror that of the pics of dissassembled dealer samples that have been out there for a while.
The two key things that stand out to me are:
1) The XCR has a single-unit monolithic upper, with all the rails integrated, and a free floating barrel. The SCAR has a two piece, screwed together upper, with all the rails screwed on, and the 6 oclock rail screwed directly to the barrel. FN says the barrel is free floating, but the pics of the dealer samples out there certainly indicate that it is not. Maybe the civi model has a significantly different design... I don't know. Has anyone on this forum actually bought one?
2) The XCR's bolt and operation are more AK like (3 lug bolt, long stroke piston) while the FN's bolt and action are more AR18-like (many-lug bolt, spring loaded ejector, short stroke action). Personally I think the XCR's action looks more robust, though I'm sure either can take plenty more abuse than an AR15.
I still want a SCAR, but I will never pay a dollar over MSRP for one, and would be hesitant even at that price (and if I did, it would be for the collectibility, not the functionality). Personally, based on what I've seen, I think its a $2k rifle, and that is including some gravy for the FN name.