This fellow tested Boretech Eliminator against KG-12 and, so far as I can see, they came out so similar in practical effectiveness as to be indistinguishable.
https://www.shootersforum.com/gun-cleaning/80374-copper-removal-test-boretech-vs-kg-12-a.html
I can say that Boretech requires no physical effort to speak of. We have an embarrassment of riches when it comes to copper removal these days...but...the real question is whether we are stepping on our own privates in removing it at all.
This fellow makes a case for the necessity of leaving it in our barrels.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYINxnvaxuc
He begins to talk about copper at about 3 minutes into the video...
I will say this: I was very happy with the accuracy of a Win. 70 chambered in 280 Rem after working up a load of 52.5 grains of IMR 4350. It was giving me .3 of an inch groups at 100 yards. Being obsessed with ever greater accuracy (like ever sharper knife blades) I determined to improve on .3 groups.
I went off on a quest to get even the shadow of copper residue out of that barrel and I finally did. But to bolster the case for leaving it in, my accuracy did, in fact, fall off.
Now, I did also lighten the trigger (in the abstract that should have helped) and tried various other powders that extremely knowledgeable professional reloaders assured me would benefit everything in my life including my breath.
After all my "improvements" I am going back to leaving the copper in, having a trigger set at 4 lbs, and IMR 4350. I don't care what works for the rest of the world. More power to you, whatever you choose...
Now, if only I could break myself of the passion to get knife blades sharp enough to cut sunlight...