annielulu
Member
That's what I like about my Khar PM9. I alway carry chambered and then it's just point and shoot.
My department at one time issued Smith & Wesson 5906s. The department did not have a policy whether the pistol should be carried on or off safe.On the flip side, there are also stories where the safety helped SAVE the good guy, when the BG took the gun away and couldn't work it. Some LEO's are like this since they get into tussles more often than the public.
Yes it is.
While no one is saying he shouldn't have made himself more proficient with a defense weapon, the fact is that there is less to forget with a revolver in a situation occurs in which there is duress -- which doesn't exist in a range. Ask G. Gordon Liddy -- this is his idea and he's been there, done that.
Double Naught Spy said:Quote:
Yes it is.
While no one is saying he shouldn't have made himself more proficient with a defense weapon, the fact is that there is less to forget with a revolver in a situation occurs in which there is duress -- which doesn't exist in a range. Ask G. Gordon Liddy -- this is his idea and he's been there, done that.
If we are going to reference disembodied authority, Ayoob has noted that DA triggers often result is a higher percentage of missed first shots. So the clerck could have had a revolver, drawn, fired, missed, then been killed.
Disengaging the safety isn't rocket science. It should be like using the sights or knowing which way to point the gun before firing. I realize that some of you probably should be using handgrenades because they don't require aligning the sights and aligning the sights is just another thing you might forget to do.
Serious, do any of y'all forget to pull the trigger to make the gun go bang?
Wouldn't have happened if the gun was a GLOCK.
One of the reasons I still go for old fashioned wheel guns. They tend to be panic proof.