Colt Holster (Horse) Pistols

Status
Not open for further replies.

mec

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2002
Messages
4,588
The Holsters being mounted on either side of a saddle and the revolvers sometimes called Horse Pistols as well.
It would be nice to know just how powerful the big revolvers
really were. There is no way of knowing exactly how they performed with 19th century components. At that time, powder manufacture was, by no means, standardized nor did any one agree on a consistent grain size for powders randing from FG to FFFFG. Large revolvers were likely to be loaded with anything that was available and most sources seemed to recommend ffg for any caliber above .31. Current recommendations are to use FFFG for all the revolvers.

walker.jpg

Original Walker Colt Company C #39
The best we can do is check them out with modern components and imagine we might have the real story.
The Walkers were made in 1847 and thoroughly field tested by the United States Mounted Rifles and Texas Rangers. The word then (probably wrong) was that the Walkers carried as far and struck as hard as the 1842 carbine. Subsequent wisdom deems them the most powerful handgun up until the time of the .357 Magnum. Published velocities for fully loaded percussion revolvers vary widely. Some sources have the 140 grain ball going over 1200 feet per second while others put the velocity considerably lower. Even at that high velocity, the Walker is no more powerful than the nominally listed factory standard .45 Colt load and less powerful than the gestimated blackpowder loading of that cartridge.

We got these velocities with a well fitted Uberti Replica:
140 Grain Ball Charge Velocity Extreme Spread
55 FFFG 1001 54
55 FFG 956 46
200 Grain Lee 40 FFFG 927 40
These checked over our chronograph produce energy figures much like the factory loadings of the .45 ACP. It is possible to load 60 grains of Pyrodex P and get ball velocities in the 1200 fps range. Those gunwriters who claim to load a full 60 grains of fffg are probably doing all their test and evaluation from the word processor. 60 grains of fffg overfills the chamber and there is not enough room to seat the ball.
walkerwater2.jpg

The Walker put this .454 ball through 35 inches of water- the ball stopping in the jug marked "X" after knocking a hole in the off-side. The recovered ball was the exact size and shape as when rammed into the chamber. Look how neat this picture is- the lids on the big jugs are floating on columns of water and there is a lot of smoke!

The Dragoon was introduced in 1848 and underwent three stages of developement through 1850 or 51. The Barrel is 7.5"- two inches shorter than the Walker while the cylinder is about 1/4" shorter with correspondingly reduced powder capacity. You can seat a ball over 45 grains of fffg or 50 of Pyrodex P. 35 grains of tripple f is as much as you can get in with this 200 grain bullet and some of the period picket bullets were a good bit heavier.

Our Dragoon produce velocities and energies ranging from standard and high velocity .38 special loads.
140 Grain
.454 Ball 45 Grains FFFG 881fps 19spread 5 rnds
200 Grain 35 Grains FFFG 967 26
Lee Bullet

Pyrodex P raises the power level to about that of the old 38-44 Outdoorsman loading of the .38 Special
454 Ball 45 Gr/Vol Pyrodex P 1157 55
200 Grain 35 Gr/Vol Pyrodex P 1066 57

Even with the maximum charges, recoil with these heavy revolvers is quite mild. The Ball loads are more accurate than even the best bullets and will frequently produce better off hand groups than the bullets do from the bench.
dragoon60oh1.jpg
 
Nice job, Mec! Elmer Keith who was quite a hunter, stated the RB in a front loader was a killer out of proportion to its size and grain weight giving much better results than a round nosed centerfire bullet. He was particularly emphatic about the .36 Navy whose pill looks about like a single buckshot. Interesting.
 
Your picture pretty well illustrates why the loading lever latch was added to the Dragoons, and subsequent models.
 
I've always wondered about that. I do think keith was on solid ground and from the history that has come down it seems that Hickock had a better one shot stop record than most of Marshall Sanow. So far I don't see evidence that round balls expand, flatten out or whatever. The one that jesse james wore around inside his ribcage looked just like the one in the picture (.36) when they dug him up to harvest some dna.
After a while, I'll shot some balls through a rack of ribs and see if the bone has any effect on them.

That loading lever doesn't drop down when you use a relatively weak charge of something like American Pioneer.(at least not before it wears a little.) That kind of gets away from the reality of these old boomers. Doens't take long to just re-erect the lever after each shot.
 
Mec,
I REALLY wish you handt posted that pic...now I gotta have me a BP pistol!!!GRRRRRRR!!!!!!

Prolly have to go with the .36cal though...Shotting one handed ya know :cool:
 
The navy's and armies good for that. So, are the walker/dragoons. In fact, the muzzle heaviness makes them rock solid on the end of one arm.
 
I think I saw some authentic Dragoon horse holsters at a fort museum out in West Texas, though they may have been replicas.

These guns are actually fairly moderate in recoil, as they are so DARN heavy in the first place! A conical ball would give a different result!

I have one of the Umbert's Walker's, which I fondle from timw to time.
 
pretty mild even with the 200 grain lee conical and a chamber full of power.
 
Mec,
Great photo! If you file a slight step in the business end to the rammer spring you can prevent the rammer from falling with heavy loads. There is a rounded tip on the spring that you can file (or Dremel) a little ledge so it catches the lever a little better. It's an easy fix.

Also, I believe that the original Walkers were .46 caliber. I could be wrong, however. The tendency is to want to fully load these guns but you are asking to either crush the wedge (best situation. $9 replacement+S&H) or stretch and even break the wedge cutout in the cylinder pin (worse case scenario). The latter situation causes the cylinder gap to open up to where you get big blasts of flame/smoke out the top of the gun. Makes you think the gun is really powerful but the power is not propelling the ball. If it goes on further (especially with full loads+conicals) you could send the barrel down range. A fellow already did that using 777. My two are a lot of fun for Cowboy Action matches where I shoot 44grs of FFg +lube wad+.454 ball +over ball grease & #10Remington cap.
 
Have had one for a few years and used to hunt pigs with it,loaded with a bore button type bullet it worked rather well out to about 40 yards,on small hogs..Only used black powder never tried any other..I wouldn't advised 777 though, the little booklet says don't compress the powder
 
I remember old gun magazine articles about shooting hogs with them. One guy says he knows of them being scattered with H777. Funny thing about powder and substitutes. IN the 31s Ive clocked, Pyrodex, fffg goex, and h777 get about the same velocities with a slight nod to fffg. In my 36, pyrodex and fffg produce the same velocities with black being a bit more consistent. H777, loaded to the same volume, spreads out over 250 or so feet per second with some readings up in the 1200s. By the time you get to .44s, ( in my clocking, at least) pyrodex is significantly faster than fffg and I don't use H777 except in smaller charges.
H777 loaded to less volumn produces very consistent velocites but, at least in the large capacity revolvers and single shot pistols, doens't work well as a direct volume to volume substitute.
 
Darn fine write-up, mec. Thanks. But if you had a table you wouldn't have to hunker down like ya'll having a gunfight under the tables in a barroom. Are all the tarps to avoid kicking up dust?

The Dragoon is indeed nice and steady in the hand and a mild recoiling wheelgun even with full loads. I find I can't hold straight arm for all that many shots, then I bend my arm like in all the Russel and Remington gunfight paintings. That just makes it easier to hold steady.

Thanks for that pic of the squished ball. First I've seen of such.

Bart Noir
 
The down and dirty shooting position is to keep the ball aligned with all those water bottles. Shoot from a bench and pretty soon the bullet angles into the ground. I'f I'd been the shooter, I would have gone to roll over prone.

When I try to sit on my heals like bates is doing, I just fall over backwards.
 
Fall over backwards? Yeah, that can be a way of measuring the percieved recoil. "this load causes a back-roll and a quarter" Just keep the finger off the trigger as you roll back :)

I sorta meant to put the jugs up on a table too. But that sort of infrastructure starts adding up. Once it's more work than fun, why do it?

Bart Noir
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top