I ordered a Springfield Scout Squad in Mossy Oak back on 11/10 for $1,499.99 along with two 20 round M14 M1A Magazines (USGI New) for $41.99 each for a grand total (including shipping and FFL fee) of $1,733.97. Since placing that order, the price of the M1A alone is now $1,799.99 and I doubt that the company is going to honor the price on my original order. Today at my local gun shop, I was thoroughly checking out an FNAR with the heavy fluted barrel. It comes with one 20 round magazine, a hard case, three interchangeable cheekpieces, three butt pads and five shims to fine tune the cast and drop. The total price (including tax) is $1,699.75. The store owner told me he'll include one additional 20 round magazine for free and FN has a coupon for a shooting mat (valued at $180 ... ).
So my options now are to ...
1. Wait for the M1A to come in and hope that the order price is honored. If it isn't, I'll be paying just under $2,000 compared to the original $1,733.99.
2. Buy the FNAR for the price shown and cancel the M1A order.
3. Buy something else.
4. Don't buy anything.
It seems to me that there are a number of similarities and differences between the M1A Scout and the FNAR. Here are some of the main features.
M1A
18" six-groove 1:11 RH twist barrel with proprietary muzzle stabilizer
Parkerized
Detachable magazine (10 round with 20 round option)
Iron sights
Scout scope mount
Gas piston
2-stage military trigger 5 - 6lb
40.3" (L)
9.3lb (W)
FNAR
20" four-groove 1:12 RH twist heavy fluted barrel with chrome lining and target crown
Parkerized
Detachable 20 round magazine
Multiple MIL-STD 1913 rails
Gas piston
41.5" (L)
10.0lb (W)
I'd really be interested to hear some thoughts on what you think is good/bad about either rifle. I will agree at the start that the M1A is a much better looking rifle but I've read some articles that claim that the stock on the FNAR is very ergonomic as is the pistol grip. The fact that the stock is adjustable (cheekpiece, LOP, cast, drop) should be a plus. I found it very comfortable to hold/aim and the balance with the heavy barrel was good. The trigger was ok, the position of the slide release makes it fairly easy to operate with the index finger of the left hand underneath the forend. The lack of iron sights is a problem although it might be possible to mount front/rear sights to the top rail (short sight radius though). How about accuracy? The FNAR is supposed to be sub MOA with factory ammunition so how does that compare to the M1A Scout?
Thanks.
So my options now are to ...
1. Wait for the M1A to come in and hope that the order price is honored. If it isn't, I'll be paying just under $2,000 compared to the original $1,733.99.
2. Buy the FNAR for the price shown and cancel the M1A order.
3. Buy something else.
4. Don't buy anything.
It seems to me that there are a number of similarities and differences between the M1A Scout and the FNAR. Here are some of the main features.
M1A
18" six-groove 1:11 RH twist barrel with proprietary muzzle stabilizer
Parkerized
Detachable magazine (10 round with 20 round option)
Iron sights
Scout scope mount
Gas piston
2-stage military trigger 5 - 6lb
40.3" (L)
9.3lb (W)
FNAR
20" four-groove 1:12 RH twist heavy fluted barrel with chrome lining and target crown
Parkerized
Detachable 20 round magazine
Multiple MIL-STD 1913 rails
Gas piston
41.5" (L)
10.0lb (W)
I'd really be interested to hear some thoughts on what you think is good/bad about either rifle. I will agree at the start that the M1A is a much better looking rifle but I've read some articles that claim that the stock on the FNAR is very ergonomic as is the pistol grip. The fact that the stock is adjustable (cheekpiece, LOP, cast, drop) should be a plus. I found it very comfortable to hold/aim and the balance with the heavy barrel was good. The trigger was ok, the position of the slide release makes it fairly easy to operate with the index finger of the left hand underneath the forend. The lack of iron sights is a problem although it might be possible to mount front/rear sights to the top rail (short sight radius though). How about accuracy? The FNAR is supposed to be sub MOA with factory ammunition so how does that compare to the M1A Scout?
Thanks.
Last edited: