Coning question

Joined
May 25, 2007
Messages
619
Location
Wyoming
Hi folks, Im going to cone the muzzle of my .40 flint gun, I did this to several others and it is a great addition. And yea, I could google where to find the fixture, but this way it sparks a conversation and everyone can see
, even if only marginally interesed in doing it where they might find the device. Thanks for any and all participants
 
I used a coning tool from Joe Wood, AKA "flintsteel" on the Muzzleloading Forum to do a couple rifles.


Just follow his simple directions and you should get good results. I used a tap wrench to turn the tool.

I recommend using double-sided carpet tape rather than glue to hold the sandpaper to the tool. I tried glue and it didn't work well but made a big mess.

After coning my rifles I saw absolutely no difference in point of impact or group size at 50 yards.
 
I've used a 3/4 inch carbide ball shaped cutter in a old style brace. Cleaned it up with a ball shaped medium grit stone in the brace. Works well enough.
 
I've used a 3/4 inch carbide ball shaped cutter in a old style brace.
But that is crowning ... not coning. Coning puts a long taper into the bore ...

It works, I've done dozens, including this 5-shot offhand @ 30-yards to win the smallest group contest. In the best score contest all my shots were in the X-ring in the bullseye. Never missed all day, also went 15 for 15 on the woodswalk with novelty targets out to 80-yards, having used the Joe Wood tool on my 50-cal left-handed Issac Haines flint longrifle. That same rifle and me also shot the highest scores offhand @ 100-yards at the last 2 NE Flintlock Championship shoots.

Yeah ... coning doesn't hurt accuracy one bit ...

7F1C0A46-B878-4BBC-88F8-27EDC5F54A92.jpeg
 
The accuracy of the rifles I've done has not suffered, at all. Someone ' borrowed my .50 cal tool, can't remember who, and didn't remember where I got it. But I did keep a short starter laying around, just to remind me how suckee that is.
 
I coned my Jeager, for ease of loading. I was not concerned over a small loss of accuracy, but like others I didn't see any decrease although I've never really done much target shooting with that rifle, other than sighting it in, and playing around with different loads/patches/ball size/lubes now and then lets me know how she shoots. It's for bears, deer, and elk, so as long as I can get it in the boiler room I'm good. I did gut-shoot a bear, but the coned muzzle made me feel better about going into the brush after it. That would have been a bad time to be short-starting.
 
Joe Woods make them … out tonight, will post his contact info later …

I strongly recommend against the one that uses jags of various calibers (due to runout).
 
Thanx Lefty38-55, I thought Joe....somebody but didn't recall. I have done my two .50s and really like the outcome, so, my dedicated coyote flinter .40 is next in line. This time Im not letting it outa my sight.
 
I coned my Jeager, for ease of loading. I was not concerned over a small loss of accuracy, but like others I didn't see any decrease although I've never really done much target shooting with that rifle, other than sighting it in, and playing around with different loads/patches/ball size/lubes now and then lets me know how she shoots. It's for bears, deer, and elk, so as long as I can get it in the boiler room I'm good. I did gut-shoot a bear, but the coned muzzle made me feel better about going into the brush after it. That would have been a bad time to be short-starting.
Everytime short starting is a bad time.
 
Back
Top