Considering a Model 10 Smith & Wesson

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thanks for all the encouraging information. I'm also considering a S&W mod 64 or mod 67 which I think is simply a stainless steel version of the model 10 as btg3 pointed out earlier. I believe that the only difference between the 64 and 67 is the 67 has adjustable sights. Please correct me if I'm wrong about this. Does anybody have any comments or recommendations about the differences between the Mod 10, 64, and 67? Once again, I appreciate all the responses and place value on all of them.
 
Beware of Copies of S&W model 10 (AKA Military & Police)

There are some copies of the Model 10 that look good, but are not well made (such as some Spanish copies). Look for the S&W logo, to be safe.:)
 
Thanks. I'm wondering how the 64 compares to the 67 other than the adjustable sights.
 
Are the current mod 10's, 64's, and 67's being produced by Smith & Wesson today standard barrel or heavy barrel?
 
My first gun, almost 20 years ago, was a Model 10 Royal Hong Kong Police issue. I took my CCW test with it, and taught my wife to shoot. It took a lot of abuse from both of us, and still works great. I gave it to my Dad a couple of years ago as a house gun since all he had were .22's.
 
There oughta be a law that everbody should own a S&W M&P/Model 10 of some kind.

Nah...some people, like me, dislike the K-Frame. I much prefer the GP100, Super Redhawk, and N-Frame sizes.
 
I have some of each... Model 64, Speed Six, Service Six.

After trigger jobs on all, the Rugers just don't measure up. If you're happy with any trigger, the Rugers are otherwise just fine.
 
I'm still interested to know if the current production 10's, 64's, and 67's being produced by Smith & Wesson today are standard barrel or heavy barrel. They appear to be heavy barrel on the S&W website but I'm still not sure.
 
IIRC, the M-15 has a svelt skinny barrel that really makes it balance well. The M-67 has a thicker, but not a bull barrel that, for me, doesn't feel as nice.

Still, I'd give that 67 a good hard look.
 
I'm still interested to know if the current production 10's, 64's, and 67's being produced by Smith & Wesson today are standard barrel or heavy barrel. They appear to be heavy barrel on the S&W website but I'm still not sure.
HB.

But I'll ask you to ponder this... why buy new when you can find so many nice used older pre lock model 10-15-64-67's for less $$?

I'll also throw this out there to ponder, look for a 3" or 5" M10.
 
That's a good question. I've always preferred new, never owned stuff because you never can be sure of the use and care a preowned item has had. I'm sure that I've missed out on some good buying opportunities but everyone needs to do what they're most comfortable with. Thanks for your interest.
 
David E said:
Still, I'd give that 67 a good hard look.

Agreed. If this is going to be a range gun, I'd opt for adjustable sights. IMO, fixed sights are ok for a carry gun, in which case, I'd also prefer something with a 3" or less barrel.

As far as the M10, I had one (a pristine pencil-barreled 4" 10-5) because "everyone ought to have one". I neither carried it, nor found myself shooting it at the range, since I have better revos for that. Not much of a collector, I eventually sold it.
 
Is the adjustable sights the only difference between the 64 and 67?
 
The front sight's different, too. The 67 utilizes a red ramp front that's pinned in, so it can be swapped for, say, a fiber optic if you prefer that. The 64 has a small-ish plain front sight that's integral with the barrel, so it's effectively unchangeable, especially if it's on a 2-piece barrel as shown on the S&W website.
 
I like the look of the fixed sight Smiths better, but I like the sight picture of adjustable sight Smiths better.
Own both, like both, won't sell either. If I were to sell one, it wouldn't be my 15-3 or my 586 no dash.
Doubt I could sell my 10-6, though. She's not real purty on the outside. She's great on the inside, but she was an evidence locker gun, and looks to have possibly been a suicide gun.
Kinda morbid, if you think about it. I try not to think about it. Can't blame an inanimate object for the actions of it's owner.....wait a minute, the gun control crowd does.
 
My first carry gun was a 1953 Model 10 snubby. I've had a few since then but I only have one left. It's a 10-7 3". A good shooter with great balance. I carry it from time to time.
 
M&P Model 10

Buy it, it is a good carry gun, with flat nose bullets it is a good stopper, and it hold up great. I have a 53 M&P and a newer one. I don't carry them, they stay by my bed or in the gun safe as they are collectors piece. I am looking for one to carry to replace my Bersa Thunderer. I carry a Colt SAA a lot. I figure a revolver is a good choice for a carry gun in that when the nerves hit, fine motor skills can go out the window. Here in SC I can carry any gun I want, I used the M&P 38 for qualifying and scored better than most with Glocks and such. Get a used but not abused Model 10 save the money and use it to practice and get your skills honed. Also in a push you can pull bring the gun up not aim and with the point ability of the 10 you can save a second or two and it might save your life
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top