maybe it is just me, but if a guy needed food during the flood id have given him some even though he could have prepared himself.
Unfortunately, the individual officer standing out there in the water wasn't the guy who decides what steps in preperation the department will take. Plus i got to give him kudos on taking a low paying job where he puts life and limb at risk to protect and serve. While i may have a beef with the chief of police and a lot of other bull???? in NO, i would not take it out on a police officer in need of extra firepower, even if that means the gun stands a good chance of not getting back to me.
of course, as you said, if there was an available friend or family member unarmed they would get first dole, but then they would be carrying it around, not me. Again, even if i knew there was a distinct chance that that neighbor and i may part paths and relocate after the disaster and not get my gun back, at least not in working order, i'd still help h im out. My concern wouldn;'t actually be the return of the firearm, it would be the chances of the firearm working its way through many hands and end up being used in a crime later on.
If anything, my main reason for not giving a spare arm to someone in need isn't because i am taking out the poor decision of the chief of police on an individual officer, it is because a 12 guage and a box of shells is a great thing to barter with. As said on another topic, that diamond ring you looted isn't going to get you a loaf of bread, but bartering a spare shotgun for a 10 gallon can of gas, that's reasonable.