Lennyjoe
Member
Buddy has a NIB CZ P10 that he’s offering me for $390 but I already have so many striker fired, DAO 9MM’s that I’m not really excited about it. What’s the benefit of adding it other than having more variety?
CZ P10 - what’s the benefit?
- Thread starter Lennyjoe
- Start date
sevt_chevelle
Member
Am a big CZ guy, am not adding the P10 to my lineup.
I prefer the S&W, not buying a new brand just for the heck of it.
I prefer the S&W, not buying a new brand just for the heck of it.
InTheSwamp
Member
Full size, I assume. Not a bad price.
I like hammer fired CZs, so I'd pass.
I like hammer fired CZs, so I'd pass.
armoredman
Member
I never, ever wanted a striker fired polymer pistol, was a die hard CZ hammer fired pistol nut.
I qualified with the Glock 19 every year with my Dept, either Expert or Distinguished Expert, but I never cared for the pistol, just doesn't fit me at all. So when the P-10 series came out, I was literally, ho hum, whoopee.
Then I picked one up, because I ran the forum, so I needed to be able to know what I was talking about, right?
Wow. It fit. It fit like a glove. Do I like the P-10 series? You tell me.
Not to mention this gem, the rare as hens teeth P-10C White Nitride.
Yeah, I am a believer and have been carrying this FDE 2017 P-10C now for 6 years, and I am perfectly content.
I qualified with the Glock 19 every year with my Dept, either Expert or Distinguished Expert, but I never cared for the pistol, just doesn't fit me at all. So when the P-10 series came out, I was literally, ho hum, whoopee.
Then I picked one up, because I ran the forum, so I needed to be able to know what I was talking about, right?
Wow. It fit. It fit like a glove. Do I like the P-10 series? You tell me.
Not to mention this gem, the rare as hens teeth P-10C White Nitride.
Yeah, I am a believer and have been carrying this FDE 2017 P-10C now for 6 years, and I am perfectly content.
InTheSwamp
Member
It's all about to be content.
OP
OP
Lennyjoe
Member
I prefer the hammer fired CZ PCR I have. It’s the only CZ in my collection at this time. Maybe I’ll fire my buddies P10 and see how it feels.
Rittmeister
Member
I also never wanted a poly-striker gun, but tried them all (S&W, Walther, VP9, P320, Glock, etc etc). The P10 was easily the best for me in terms of ergos and trigger feel. The only thing for me that's eclipsed it more recently is the PDP, but I haven't bothered to buy one as I'm too happy with the P10.
$390 is a good price, you might like it more than you think. Worst case you can probably get that money back if you decide to move it on after trying it.
$390 is a good price, you might like it more than you think. Worst case you can probably get that money back if you decide to move it on after trying it.
I have no experience with the CZ P10, however I've seen many many video reviews about this pistol and the general consensus is that its benefits are the trigger (one of the best if not the best in the category), the ergonomic of the grip and the accuracy. Grip texture, slide serrations and sights are also considered from good to very good.
The pistol also seems to be very robust with the barrel that has an impressive thickness for the caliber.
The pistol also seems to be very robust with the barrel that has an impressive thickness for the caliber.
sparkyv
Member
I have and like the P-07 and P-09, but I didn't get a P-10 because of the trigger dingus and the Gluck style take down. But even so, I'd be tempted with this:
I'd say nothing really. The P-10 C is my favorite compact striker pistol, and I'm not a big striker gun fan. They have a really nice trigger, and great texture to them. Same disassembly as a Glock, it's pretty similar in design. They're selling for cheap prices right now, likely because they aren't very popular and I don't know of any L.E. actually using them. I got a second optic ready model of GB for $400, so it's not really a deal IMO. Their optic system is pretty lousy, plates don't seem to be readily available unless aftermarket.
armoredman
Member
Some P-10 videos I made back in the day.
And one with the P-10S
And one with the P-10S
dh1633pm
Contributing Member
I thought about getting one when I got my APX. This one:
https://www.eurooptic.com/CZ-USA-P-...ymer-Frame-Nitride-Slide-Fixed-Sights-3-.aspx
Always had good experiences with CZ products.
https://www.eurooptic.com/CZ-USA-P-...ymer-Frame-Nitride-Slide-Fixed-Sights-3-.aspx
Always had good experiences with CZ products.
trackskippy
Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2010
- Messages
- 3,510
I got one lightly used, and only had it for a little while. Basically just another Glock knockoff.
Mine came with a threaded barrel and suppressor sights. I got it for a reasonable price and did look online to see if there were issues before I bought it, and there where a number being discussed, mostly about problems with the suppressor mounted. So I did know that going in, but the price was right so I figured Id give it a try.
And of course, that was an issue with the gun I had. Ran fine without the suppressor, and was basically a hand cycled single shot with it on there. Supposedly it would clear up after a few hundred rounds, and after a number, it did start to straighten out, but it never was 100% with the suppressor mounted while I had it.
Ive noticed that the trigger seems to impress a lot of people, but I found it somewhat annoying. That was one thing they didnt copy from Glock. Mine was mushy and just felt weird. It was probably a bit lighter than the Glocks I have, but something about it just never felt right. Never had a problem with it though.
Mine came with a threaded barrel and suppressor sights. I got it for a reasonable price and did look online to see if there were issues before I bought it, and there where a number being discussed, mostly about problems with the suppressor mounted. So I did know that going in, but the price was right so I figured Id give it a try.
And of course, that was an issue with the gun I had. Ran fine without the suppressor, and was basically a hand cycled single shot with it on there. Supposedly it would clear up after a few hundred rounds, and after a number, it did start to straighten out, but it never was 100% with the suppressor mounted while I had it.
Ive noticed that the trigger seems to impress a lot of people, but I found it somewhat annoying. That was one thing they didnt copy from Glock. Mine was mushy and just felt weird. It was probably a bit lighter than the Glocks I have, but something about it just never felt right. Never had a problem with it though.
eddiememphis
Member
I bought a barely used P-10S and really like it.
I have not been a fan of striker guns' triggers. This one is actually pretty nice, with a crisp break and a short reset. I added an aftermarket trigger which made a good trigger better.
I am left handed so I appreciate the swappable mag release. The slide lock was unusable so I swapped a longer, dual sided one.
It is small but fills my hand nicely, although the grip angle is more vertical than a 1911 or even a P-01. At 25 ounces with empty 12 round mag and red dot, it is heavy enough to mitigate some recoil yet light enough to carry. Between the comfort, trigger, weight and red dot, it is surprisingly accurate for such a small gun (3 1/2 inch barrel).
My biggest gripe is the tight chamber typical of CZs. This means I have to pay attention to which hand loads I put in it.
As others have said, buy it. If you don't like it, someone will buy it for the same price. It may surprise you- it certainly did me.
Edit- I went to the range today and did this-
7 yards, 115gr XTPs, 4gr Titegroup, 1.085"
I have not been a fan of striker guns' triggers. This one is actually pretty nice, with a crisp break and a short reset. I added an aftermarket trigger which made a good trigger better.
I am left handed so I appreciate the swappable mag release. The slide lock was unusable so I swapped a longer, dual sided one.
It is small but fills my hand nicely, although the grip angle is more vertical than a 1911 or even a P-01. At 25 ounces with empty 12 round mag and red dot, it is heavy enough to mitigate some recoil yet light enough to carry. Between the comfort, trigger, weight and red dot, it is surprisingly accurate for such a small gun (3 1/2 inch barrel).
My biggest gripe is the tight chamber typical of CZs. This means I have to pay attention to which hand loads I put in it.
As others have said, buy it. If you don't like it, someone will buy it for the same price. It may surprise you- it certainly did me.
Edit- I went to the range today and did this-
7 yards, 115gr XTPs, 4gr Titegroup, 1.085"
Last edited:
Cornhusker77
Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 635
I like mine better than my Glock (Gen 3) but I think I like my M&P 2.0 a little better.
The CZ has a better trigger, but the M&P fits my hand better
I tend to shoot to the left when I haven't shot for a while.
The CZ has a better trigger, but the M&P fits my hand better
I tend to shoot to the left when I haven't shot for a while.
JR24
Member
Variety. I was excited about the P-10 series initially but was pretty “meh” about them once I short one. Nice enough but it’s just another plastic striker.
For CZ I’d prefer a P01 or P-07/09 if I wanted lighter.
Then again Glocks just work for me when it comes to plastic striker guns, so most of the others are just variety anyway.
But, who knows, maybe it’ll be “the one” and blow the competition away, we’re all different so of course we all gotta buy at least one of each… right?
For CZ I’d prefer a P01 or P-07/09 if I wanted lighter.
Then again Glocks just work for me when it comes to plastic striker guns, so most of the others are just variety anyway.
But, who knows, maybe it’ll be “the one” and blow the competition away, we’re all different so of course we all gotta buy at least one of each… right?
TomJ
Contributing Member
PSA has them on sale for $369.99.
https://palmettostatearmory.com/cz-p10c-9mm-4-15rd-black-91558.html
https://palmettostatearmory.com/cz-p10c-9mm-4-15rd-black-91558.html
Ignition Override
Member
One night at Shoot Point Blank I rented both the Walther PPQ and the CZ P10.
Although I have only carried DA/SA hammer-fired guns, both the Walther and CZ were equally appealing.
My primary striker ‘experience’ has been with Glocks, which don’t have much appeal.
Although I have only carried DA/SA hammer-fired guns, both the Walther and CZ were equally appealing.
My primary striker ‘experience’ has been with Glocks, which don’t have much appeal.
Tallball
Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2014
- Messages
- 7,814
LoL! Yeah. I gave my CZ P10 to a relative as a special gift, but I still have the PPQ.
Glocks feel extra mediocre compared to really nice pistols like those.
Ignition Override
Member
Tallball: other than feeling awkward, Glocks - functionally- are impressive guns- not just due to global popularity.
This is not to appease the readers, but based on two friends’ loving their Glocks and guns’ track records, I must Be
“fair and balanced”.
This is not to appease the readers, but based on two friends’ loving their Glocks and guns’ track records, I must Be
“fair and balanced”.
Last edited:
trackskippy
Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2010
- Messages
- 3,510
I think most things new and unfamiliar tend to be awkward at first, at least until you put in the time and effort to figure them out. Something I think a lot of the people who complain, have never bothered to do.
I find it kind of funny the complaints about the Glocks vs the P10, when the P10 is basically and very much, just a Glock copy, and really not a great one at that. If mediocre applied to either of them, it would be the P10.
The fact they sold the one I got, with suppressor sights and a threaded barrel, you would have thought they would have made sure it would work with a suppressor mounted.
If youre a CZ fan, maybe its the gun for you. Only one way to find out. Get out your wallet.
I find it kind of funny the complaints about the Glocks vs the P10, when the P10 is basically and very much, just a Glock copy, and really not a great one at that. If mediocre applied to either of them, it would be the P10.
The fact they sold the one I got, with suppressor sights and a threaded barrel, you would have thought they would have made sure it would work with a suppressor mounted.
If youre a CZ fan, maybe its the gun for you. Only one way to find out. Get out your wallet.
OP
OP
Lennyjoe
Member
I have a Walther PPQ in both 9MM and .40 and both felt better than the P10. I finally got to handle one last week while visiting PSA.
Tallball
Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2014
- Messages
- 7,814
Glocks are fine. I own three. Their reliability is impressive. Their triggers are so-so.
I gave the P10 away some years ago, but I still have the PPQ.
The PPQ's trigger blows the Glock triggers away. No comparison.
Nothing wrong with Glocks. I just happen to have a lot of service pistols and the Glocks don't really stand out.
I gave the P10 away some years ago, but I still have the PPQ.
The PPQ's trigger blows the Glock triggers away. No comparison.
Nothing wrong with Glocks. I just happen to have a lot of service pistols and the Glocks don't really stand out.
trackskippy
Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2010
- Messages
- 3,510
As with any of them, their triggers are just what they are, and other than a one or two oddball guns in the distant past, I never had a problem with shooting any of them.
And you shouldn't be or need to be, thinking about the trigger when you shoot anyway. Your focus belongs elsewhere.
I have a bunch of different service-type guns as well, SIG's, Berettas, 1911's, Glocks, etc, and shoot them all the time as well. They all shoot pretty much the same for me, and I keep and regularly practice with guns with different trigger/action types, so I can pick up anything and still shoot it reasonably well without having to think about it.
What Glock has going for them is, they are simple, basic guns, that are reasonably priced, hold up very well to hard use, and rust is pretty much a non issue. They have a level of support and service, that I dont think any of the others can come close to, so it makes them pretty hard to ignore.
Not that there is anything wrong with the other major big-name makers if they are what you like.
I switched over to Glocks from SIG's, and the only reason I did, was simply $$$. I just get and can have more guns and accessories for my money with the Glocks.
And you shouldn't be or need to be, thinking about the trigger when you shoot anyway. Your focus belongs elsewhere.
I have a bunch of different service-type guns as well, SIG's, Berettas, 1911's, Glocks, etc, and shoot them all the time as well. They all shoot pretty much the same for me, and I keep and regularly practice with guns with different trigger/action types, so I can pick up anything and still shoot it reasonably well without having to think about it.
What Glock has going for them is, they are simple, basic guns, that are reasonably priced, hold up very well to hard use, and rust is pretty much a non issue. They have a level of support and service, that I dont think any of the others can come close to, so it makes them pretty hard to ignore.
Not that there is anything wrong with the other major big-name makers if they are what you like.
I switched over to Glocks from SIG's, and the only reason I did, was simply $$$. I just get and can have more guns and accessories for my money with the Glocks.
Similar threads
- Locked
