Democrtas shoot down conservative judicial nominee

Status
Not open for further replies.

rock jock

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
3,008
Location
In the moment
WASHINGTON - Attorney Miguel Estrada, whose appointment to a federal appellate court judgeship was blocked by Democrats in a protracted fight with the Bush White House, asked Thursday that he be removed from consideration.

"I write to ask you to withdraw my pending nomination," Estrada said in a letter to President Bush (news - web sites). "I believe that the time has come to return my full attention to the practice of law and to regain the ability to make long-term plans for my family."

Estrada was one of a handful of federal judicial nominees named by Bush who became lightning rods during the Senate confirmation process, where Democrats argued they were too conservative to serve on the nation's second highest court. Republicans countered that the Democrats were biased, noting that Estrada is Hispanic.

The monthslong battle came to head in July when Senate Republicans mounted a weeklong effort to get the nominations through. Democrats successfully filibustered that attempt.

"It's a terrible day for justice in America when a partisan minority of the Senate can obstruct an extremely well-qualified nominee to the federal bench, to the point of forcing Miguel Estrada to withdraw his nomination," said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas.

Sen. George Allen (news, bio, voting record), R-Va., said he hoped Estrada would be renominated in the future. Estrada said in his letter that he hopes to work for the government again sometime in the future.

"I profoundly hope that, at some time in the future, I may be called again to serve my country in some capacity," he said.

The White House had no immediate comment.

Bush aggressively tried to get the Senate to approve Estrada early this year, but has been silent on the issue in recent months.

He staged a series of public events last winter that cast Democratic opposition to Estrada as "purely political" and called Democratic refusal to approve him as a "travesty."

"Your personal involvement on my behalf has been a particular source of pride and comfort to me," Estrada said in the letter to Bush.

The president nominated Estrada to a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington more than two years ago. Senate Republicans were never able to get the necessary 60 votes to end the Democratic filibuster and get his nomination to the Senate floor for a vote.

Estrada was never able to get more than 55 votes from the Senate, which has 51 Republicans, 48 Democrats and one independent.

Estrada is a Honduran immigrant who graduated from Harvard Law School, served in both the administrations of the first President Bush and the Clinton administration. He now practices law in Washington, D.C.

Other Bush judicial nominees to the appeals court who have run into opposition over the last few years include Mississippi jurist Charles Pickering, Texas judge Priscilla Owen and Alabama Attorney General William Pryor.

Republicans sought to make political use of Estrada's Hispanic heritage during the battle for his nomination, an effort that continued even with the withdrawal.

"At root, base politics drove the Democrats' decision to deny the president the chance to someday name the first Hispanic to the Supreme Court. That is what it was all about," said C. Boyden Gray, a former White House legal counsel and now chairman of the Committee for Justice, a conservative organization that worked for Estrada's confirmation.

"They did not oppose Estrada because he was Hispanic. They opposed him because he was President Bush's Hispanic," Gray said.

"I feel symphathy for Miguel Estrada, but we feel we have no regrets about what we've done," said Sen. Charles Schumer (news, bio, voting record), D-N.Y., a strong critic of the nomination. "If the Founding Fathers are looking down on us today, I am confident that they are proud of us for defending the Constitution as we have with this nomination."

Republicans tried seven times to win the 60 votes needed to advance to a final vote on confirmation of Estrada, but Democrats blocked them each time.

In Estrada's case, Democrats said they would not allow a final vote until the Justice Department (news - web sites) released internal memos he had written while serving in the office of the solicitor general in the administration of Bush's father.

Several former solicitors general sided with the administration, Republicans and Democrats alike saying the material was confidential internal working documents.

Democrats had pressed Estrada to make clear his views on abortion rights, but he refused. Past controversial nominees have similarly deflected questions on abortion and capital punishment.

They also said Estrada lacks the judicial experience to serve on that court. Republicans accused Democrats of treating Estrada unfairly because he is a conservative Hispanic.
I didn't think it was possible for me to have a lower opinion of Chuckie Schumer. I was wrong.
 
More quotes from Schumer from a related story on the Fox News website:

Democrats said Estrada's withdrawal and the infighting that preceded the move was the White House's fault, since the Bush administration didn't give senators information they requested about the nominee's tenure at the Justice Department.

"Mr. Estrada is an unfortunate victim of a White House process of not cooperating with the Senate and stonewalling the appointment of judges," Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said during a press briefing with Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., on Thursday.

"No American expects to be hired for a job after refusing to answer questions in an interview," Schumer added, vowing that "as long as the administration continues to do this," Senate Democrats will continue to block nominees they consider "not in the mainstream."


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,96395,00.html

What planet is this idiot from???

Folks, 2004 may be the most important election year in decades. We have to get rid of these guys while we still have a country left!!
 
Snakes wiggle, dogs bark, cats hork up hairballs, Democrats block judicial nominees. What is so surprising about the order of nature.

What is disgusting to me is the pathetic attempt at power politics as exemplified by republican leadership. Is the filibuster a problem or is it not? If it is not, STHU. If it is a problem then engage in political combat. Spinelessrepublicans had 3 options to bust up the filibuster: 1>go round the clock just like the good old days, 2>change the rules with a simple majority, 3>start dropping recess appointments such as Robert Bork onto the bench.

Any one of the three options could have busted the filibuster but spinelessrepublicans did nothing.

I hope and expect Bush to pull out the corncob and kerosene and liberally apply it to Frist. This irritates me to no end when those who pretend to power don't possess the moral courage to freakin' act.

<Breathes deeply, counts to 10, and visualizes a safe place>
 
I hope and expect Bush to pull out the corncob and kerosene and liberally apply it to Frist. This irritates me to no end when those who pretend to power don't possess the moral courage to freakin' act.

I think you're considerably more optimistic than I.

Once again, the Republicans have demonstrated their skill at standing up on their hind legs to tut-tut for all they're worth, then rolling over and playing dead.
 
The minority party blocking judiciary nominees? Shocking!! Wonder where the Democrats ever got the idea for that?
 
As a latino I am disgusted. But not as disgusted as I am with the Republican party for letting them get away with this. Estrada was hanging in the wind for 28 months. The Republicans never went to bat for him. NEVER. :fire:
 
Boil Out the BS And It's Pretty Simple

Since Regan was able to stuff in Scalia (a Roman Catholic) and Clarence Thomas (a man raised by Catholic nuns who is also Catholic) the vote count is now 5-4 on the abortion and right to life issues. Both sides are going to fight tooth and nail over the next seat. I have nothing against Latinos, but it doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to know why the dems are not going to want to see a candidate who was likely raised catholic get in and flip the balance of power in the United States Supreme court.
 
We have to get rid of these guys while we still have a country left!!

Yes but how? Folks like Schumer, Feinstein, Kennedy (and yes some Republicans too) are CAREER politicians and are automatically re-elected by the sheep in their states. They barely even have to campaign anymore!

My own two leftist Senators (Mikulski and Sarbanes) have both been in office for 20+ years.

Term limits is the only way, and since they're not going to approve it somehow the people have come up with another way.....
 
Now W needs to find a very well qualified Spanish speaking black of asian decent. This nominee also needs to be meaner than a junkyard dog. I wouldn't mind seeing Chucky or Teddy laying bleeding on the capitol steps from a good beating.
 
I don't think term limits are the only way to stop the insanity. But the first step is to realize that WE ARE AT WAR and that the future of the country is at stake. We talk about this but all too often we don't really act like it. If we don't start taking what is going on more seriously and commit more time, energy, and treasure to keeping this Republic we are going to be on our backs in just a few years.

I look to organizations like Judicial Watch, the legal watchdog entity, as a possible advance guard. We need to pierce the veil and expose what is going on, lay bare the dirty tricks and the scummy deals and rabid power-grabs. Then we need to make the lives of the Lefties miserable by using the firepower of the courts against them wherever possible.

After that there is the tool of impeachment. At least one media figure, known to many on this board, has called for the impeachment of Ruth Bader-Ginsburg. If that sounds far-fetched, then maybe we need to start stretching the orbit of our fetching because nothing less than that is going to save the dream of the Founders. To believe that we can bubble up conservative views from the grass roots, through the school boards and local governments, etc. quickly enough, after so many years of letting the Left infiltrate at every level is naive. More decisive action, with far larger ramifications, is required.

That's how it looks from here anyway.
 
Waitone said it well. People like Frist are worthless, gutless, spineless members of what is aptly termed THE STUPID PARTY. When I was taking Civics in school, I learned a filibuster involved a politician standing up and talking, 24/7, until he couldn't continue. What the :cuss: is this :cuss: about taking brakes, recessing, and other :cuss: ??

Either Frist and his GOP fellows are really worthless, gutless, and spineless, or they're mentally challenged (the reason THE STUPID PARTY gained its nickname) or they agree with the Dems and didn't want Estrada either.

More and more, it seems major players in the GOP simply do NOT support the GOP platform or stated GOP policies - and that includes Mr. Bush.

I'm really, really, getting disgusted with all the RINOs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top