Devil's advocate

Status
Not open for further replies.

Byron Quick

Moderator In Memoriam
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Messages
6,482
Location
Waynesboro, Georgia
I started this thread to avoid thread hijack here:http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=35461

The referenced thread involves discussion of LEO tactics vs. a man who allegedly admitted killing a cop and then barricaded himself into his home.

Several folk stated that a good guy would NEVER barricade himself in his home and trade fire with police. Doing that AUTOMATICALLY makes you a bad guy.

Well, I'll post an event that happened many years ago. Enlighten me on exactly how the murder victim could have defended himself.

One April day, my next door neighbor Herman Delaigle had words with two local policemen. No one knows what was said except for one living ex-policeman (The other policeman died of cancer after he got out of prison). For some reason, Herman got into his pickup and ran. This was strange, because Herman had had prior dealings with the two policemen and beaten them both together on several occasions. Herman was crippled, by the way. One knee was fused after his knee was blown out in Korea. For whatever reason, Herman ran. He tried to get home. He was driving through the field behind our houses when he was cut off by the police cruisers. He was getting out of his pickup backwards(due to his fused, unbendable leg this was the only way he could exit) when one of the policemen shot him six times in the back of his head, neck, and shoulders. All of the wounds were accompanied by powder burns. I did not see this happen but I remember hearing the shots. The shots were consistent with pulling the trigger of a revolver as fast as possible.

The policemen, at their trial for premeditated murder, claimed they thought his cane was a rifle. This was actually laughable as they had seen the cane many times before and had never previously had trouble identifying its true nature. Their defense failed. They were found guilty and sentenced to life in prison. They were never placed in the general prison population and their wives had 24/7 visitation privileges. They were also paroled on their very first parole date.

So here's my question. The obvious reason that Herman was running when he had never run from them before is that he was in fear of his life. So how could he have successfully defended himself? Suppose he had made it to his house where he had firearms and had shot in self defense. According to some here, this would automatically make him a bad guy...he shot at the police.

This is true in most cases. Surrender and be arrested. Herman Delaigle's problem was that the police were coming to kill him...not arrest him. What then?
 
Herman Delaigle's problem was that the police were coming to kill him...not arrest him. What then?

seems easy, run. run to a crouded place, if not right to the police HQ, lots of witnesses, anything. if that option is not at all possible, or is just something to delay a further atack, defend yourself. i'm not saying defend yourself as a last resort either, just try to make sure you've exhausted all other options first
 
Your example does not match up with the one in the other thread.

There is a difference between "running," "barracading," and "shooting."

Lots of bad guys run. Lots. Every day. It is the norm. Somehow the police manage to reel in their desire to shoot 'em down, beat 'em up, etc. How do we know this? The vast majority of folks who run aren't hurt upon apprehention. A few cuts and bruises if they had to me wrestled with or tackled? Sure, but that is to be expected.

By the way, running makes you a bad guy, too.

After the fact you may indeed be proven a good guy, but up until that point, your a bad guy. Ask anyone, really. Heck, find a five year old and ask them who police officers chase. Test it out. You'll find out lots about the parents should the kid say anything other than something along the lines of "bad guys."
 
Erik,

Byron wasn't referring to 'the vast majority' of times when the guy running is really a criminal and the police chasing him are really the good guys. I think we all know that the police are almost always the good guys!

He was referring to one, very specific incident, wherein the police in question were actually intending to murder the guy as soon as they got ahold of him, and the guy knew it.

When faced with an ordinary murderous villain, I think most folks on this board would say that it is not untoward to shoot the villain in order to save your own life.

Some of the folks in the other thread were saying, no matter what, you do not shoot at a policeman, nor barricade yourself in your home -- shooting at a man in uniform automatically makes you the bad guy, and you thus deserve to be killed on the spot.

So Byron is asking, IF the police in a specific, narrow (and rare!) situation are actually intending to murder you in cold blood, what are you supposed to do? What should his neighbor have done? Obviously, stopping for them wasn't the right answer in that case.

What was?

pax
 
Your example does not match up with the one in the other thread.

Of course not. That is why I started a different thread to avoid the crime of thread hijack.

Herman had met these two cops on numerous occasions and had never ran whether he was arrested then or after he played Sarge to their Beetle Bailey. He wasn't in the habit of running. In fact, I've been told that the fact that he ran weighed heavily with the jury.
 
Pretty much, when it comes between a citizen and a super citizen the regular citizen gets screwed.


Sad to say but if a cop wants you dead there are ways it can happen without any legally recognized means of defense.

You can sit there and take the bullet in the head or you can run and die tired.

The police are given the benefit of the doubt in 95% of all cases.

It's just too bad for you citizen. Take your lumps and try not to get in the way.
 
That's because in 99.9% of the time the cops are the good guys.

Agree. We seem to spend a lot of time discussing the 0.1% of the cases that diverge from the norm...after all, that's why they make the news in the first place, right?

Yet, there are those on the forum who expend a lot of effort trying to transform that 99.9% into 100.0% (or more, if that were possible).:D

Deny the possibility that a systemic problem might exist in law enforcement, that the overall trend just might be in the wrong direction. Chastise those who would even bring up the issue {cop basher}. Nothing more than a cyber version of the blue wall.

But then again, that's what makes for interesting discussion, on occasion.
 
The police are given the benefit of the doubt in 95% of all cases.

Except when they roll the murder victims body over and she has the officers nameplate in her hand and his is missing from his uniform.

A friend of my wife's was murdered by a local cop(while on duty) and this is just what happened. She broke down and he told her he'd give her a ride home. Apparently he wanted something else and she ended up shot in the head. He dumped her body in a vacant lot at around 2 AM and when it was found around 6 in the morning he was the second cop on the scene when it was called in. When they rolled her over, there it was in her hand. He's serving life, and her parents and friends show up at every parole hearing. Cops are not perfect or always the good guys. Just because they wear a badge doesnt always make them right. I dont care what uniform you wear, if I feel you are a threat to my life I will act accordingly, whether it "looks" right or not. You do still have the right to protect yourself, even from those who claim to "protect and serve".
 
Hmmmmmm

Not sure about your friend who ran..... I know if I get pulled or the police want to speak to me I'll do what they say. How do you know the police wanted your friend "dead". Sounds like he had a "number" of run-ins with the law. What were they for?

I'm not saying what happened was right. I'm just saying that when you break the law OR run from law enforcement you are taking you life into your own hands.
 
As I said in the opening post...this was a long time ago. LawDog said that one of the questions he was asked when he was hired was,"Can you take a whuppin'?" Back then, it was the same around here. Herman's run ins were drunk and disorderly, brawling etc. Different times, folks. Few brawlers would have run from cops in those days. Not around here. Drinking, fighting, and waking up in jail was a way of life for some folks. That was the sum total of his "run ins."

Folks,

I wasn't interested in starting a cops are bad discussion. I don't believe they are. I wanted to know what I stated: How would it be possible to defend yourself from the fortunately rare bad cop?

Rather than see it continue as us vs. them...it's closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top