Does Anyone REALLY Hunt With 300 Win Mag?

Do You Regularly Use 300 Win Mag or Other "Magnum" Cartridge?

  • Yes! A Magnum Cartridge Fills a Hunting Need for Me.

    Votes: 157 39.3%
  • My Only Hunting Rifle is a Magnum Hunting Rifle.

    Votes: 29 7.3%
  • I Own a Magnum Hunting Rifle, But I Rarely Use It.

    Votes: 66 16.5%
  • I See No Need For a Magnum Rifle.

    Votes: 147 36.8%

  • Total voters
    399
Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a Rem 700 sps in .300 rum and have yet to shoot anything with it! I don't want to destroy alot of meat on a deer, so it hasn't made it to the deer camp yet. The only thing I have hunted with the 300 is coyotes but never had a clear shot at one yet (they must smell all that powder from a mile away). For deer I take my 30-06 Benelli R1 which is crazy accurate with 178 berger VLS's It's plenty of gun for deer, bear and even moose, but when the day comes that I head up north for a moose hunt I will be taking the 300 because of the added penetration and energy at greater distances.
 
I have a Ruger Hawkeye in .338 win. mag. I went from my .30-06 to that one with never having shot one. What a world of difference! But I bought mine for the purpose that when my kids start hunting I want something bigger for defense also.
That's also why my wife bought her .300 win. mag.
But we both still love spending a day on the range with the .30-06
 
I have owned three 7mm mags, never a 300 mag. my last magnum ended up busting my nose wide open (not enough eye releif). I sold my magnums and got a T3. The day I have to track ANYTHING shot with my 6.5x55 I might consider them again, until then I cannot justify paying $40 a box for good ammo or bruising my shoulder after only 20 rounds.
 
I traded a 1987 Coleman Pop-up camper needing a lot of TLC for a Winchester Model 70 .300 WSM with case and about 30 rounds of ammo.
It has an older Simmons Aetec 6-20X50 scope on it that has pretty darn good optics for a Simmons. I plan to sell it early 2011 because with all of my other guns, I really can't justify the initial reloading supply setup. I may keep the scope for my 22-250.

The .300 wsm definately has utility in some areas of the US for larger game. Where I hunt in central Texas, I just don't need it. Other than Coyotes at 300+ yards, there's not much to shoot at that I can't kill with a 243 or smaller center fire. My .204 reloads have always nailed the mangy K9s quick and clean.

IMO, my 30-06 Argentine Mauser is the largest I need for a Texas Hill Country White tails or a highly anticipated stray Axis Deer. The last Hog I killed was with my Ruger Bearcat at 20 yards.
 
One of my wife's uncles is a dedicated deer hunter, and his deer rifle of choice is a Ruger 77 Mark II chambered in .300 Winchester Magnum. He says he likes it because the deer are DRT, but I still use my .45 ACP, .243 Winchester, and (next year) .454 Casull in an Encore rifle.
 
I love my 300 win mag. It weighs 14 pounds with the scope so the felt recoil is moderate. Very comparable to my sporter weight 30-06. I have walked a mile with it on several occasions and its not a big deal. I sure wouldn't tote it far in any sort of difficult terrain tho... its a great beanfield rifle which is why I built it. I wanted a gun that is heavy and stable to make 300 yard shots relatively simple. I could have built a smaller caliber rifle but I knew since it was going to weigh so much, recoil wouldnt be an issue anyway. So, why not load my 165 gr Sierras to go 3300 fps?? :)))
 
I use a Remington 673 in .350 Rem Mag (loaded down a bit) for hunting white tail deer in Tennessee brush. Full factory loads are good for bear in East Tennessee, but you can really use them for anything if you don't reload.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top