No.
I don't care for the M9 at all; 3/4 of the ones I was issued were unreliable. On the pistol range. After being properly cleaned and lubed. With ball ammo.
That aside (which, in all fairness, is probably a fluke failure rate), the M9 has some bad points as a service weapon: fat grips and long trigger reach aren't good features for your typical female soldier, for instance (being smaller on average)... or anybody with smaller hands. The Ruger P-series guns basically have the same failings in this regard as the Beretta 9x series.
Given that a standard-issue military sidearm is going to be used mainly by people poorly trained in handgun use, and mostly with no pre-service firearm experience at all, a 9x19mm DA gun w/ a decocker probably IS the best choice. Single action weapons carried C&L probably ARE the best option for well-trained people who want as much first-shot accuracy with speed as they can get. But trust me, handgun training is a lower priority in the military than just about everything. Ideally, you'd make all your PFCs be IDPA hobbyists, but it ain't gonna happen.
You don't have to worry about SF, because they will use whatever they want, and what they use doesn't matter so much as long as it doesn't break.
What I personally think would be a great choice as a general service weapon, but is definitely in the "ain't gonna happen" category, is the CZ-75BD.