I bought a used Ruger Mk II in .22LR a couple of years ago. The gun looked in good shape and seemed to have very little wear. I've only fired it a few time but I have had experience fairly consistant bad extractions. The extractor just doesn't seem to want to grab the spent case. I carried out a complete strip and inspection and everything looks fine. Also, I've tried three difference brands of .22LR without improvement.
A gentleman I spoke with recently, who also owns a Ruger Mk II in .22 cal, said that the extraction problem was likely due to the fact that I was firing .22LR as opposed to .22 'long'. He explained that .22 cal comes in 'short', 'long', and 'long rifle'. I wasn't aware of this. I had always assumed that when someone refered to a .22 'long' that it was just a contraction of .22 'long rifle'. Is this a fact? What is the difference between .22 'long' and .22 'long rifle'? Would there be a problem with substituting .22 'long rifle' with .22 'long' ammunition even though the pistol was designed to fire .22LR? Just curious ...
A gentleman I spoke with recently, who also owns a Ruger Mk II in .22 cal, said that the extraction problem was likely due to the fact that I was firing .22LR as opposed to .22 'long'. He explained that .22 cal comes in 'short', 'long', and 'long rifle'. I wasn't aware of this. I had always assumed that when someone refered to a .22 'long' that it was just a contraction of .22 'long rifle'. Is this a fact? What is the difference between .22 'long' and .22 'long rifle'? Would there be a problem with substituting .22 'long rifle' with .22 'long' ammunition even though the pistol was designed to fire .22LR? Just curious ...