David E: Again, when did they suggest changing technique or execution based on caliber?
Kodiakbeer: Different calibers have different recoil levels.
What?
You answered a question I did not ask. IF I had asked: "Do all calibers kick the same?" then your answer fits.
But I did not ask that, I asked:
Again, when did they suggest changing technique or execution based on caliber?
Since you seem to maintain that a different technique
should be applied to different calibers, please explain the specific differences in technique between shooting a 9mm and a .45 acp.
However, if you watch the full speed at the beginning you can see that gun is in the same place for both shots.
There is disagreement here. You dismiss the slo-mo observation, even tho the frame in question shows the shot as it's fired, as opposed to the gun being in recoil without showing the shot. By not showing the target or the hits you can't prove your assertion that the muzzle is, in fact, back in the same place.
Watching the video again, the first 4 pairs of shots at normal speed are also revealing, especially the 3rd and 4th pair. Putting the cursor at the muzzle for the first shot, the second one is fired HIGH, before the muzzle fully recovers from recoil.
I can't imagine getting them off this fast using the sights for the second shot. It would seem like the "pull trigger - don't pull trigger" decision would eat up the time.
You're
already shooting that fast, so where does your "pull trigger - don't pull trigger" argument apply? Besides, you've already fired a shot, so the decision to shoot has already been made. The goal is to put a second shot into the target as fast as possible.
A "D" class shooter can't shoot that fast and see his sights for the follow-up shots. This is due to a number of reasons, not the least of which is, he doesn't think it's even possible....and that's why he's "D" class. It's all about proper technique and proper execution of same.
The video M1key posted shows my friend, Mike Seeklander, a Grandmaster class shooter. His first shot was at 1 second with the remaining 5 in .89. This translates to slightly less than .18 splits. (time between shots) which is faster than your .21-.22 split. And I guarantee you he saw his front sight for EACH shot.
We need a video of you shooting your technique into a paper or steel target with the camera angle being over your shoulder so we can see the gun and hits as it happens. Ideally, you'd have a shot timer and show us the readings, but as long as you don't clutter the video with music, I can figure out your split with my timer.