Editor's View: How many more will die before guns are controlled?

Status
Not open for further replies.

nico

Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2003
Messages
2,208
Location
Baltimore/Laurel, MD
http://www.hometownannapolis.com/vault/cgi-bin/bowie/view/2005B/06/16-09.HTM

Editor's View: How many more will die before guns are controlled?

by John Rouse
A 17-year-old Bowie girl is dead - shot to death by an assailant for some as yet unkown reason in a well-tended, tranquil park only steps away from the Free State and Marketplace malls.

Yet another of the millions of guns that scar this country like a pox has claimed a life that had barely begun. A child, for heaven's sake, shot to death in our midst. It's the 71st murder in Jack Johnson's Prince George's County since January.

This country's love affair with guns is sick, sick, sick.

I recall that a few years ago a group of gun afficonados (someone less restrained than myself might call them nuts) gathered near Pointer Ridge to shoot off a slew of weapons that included just about everything but a cannon. For all I know, they may even have had one of those, too, but hadn't unloaded it from the truck before they were told to depart the area by police. Their spent cartridges landed in neighboring residential areas, understandably scaring the hell out of the people who lived there. Shades of Baghdad.

I still remember this incident these many moons later because I was absolutely dumbfounded by the audacity of these characters. It was beyond my comprehension how anyone could be so downright oblivious to the safety of others. Such a shootout may not have happened in here since then, but it's a regular occurrence elsewhere. And let's be honest, it seems to be a near-daily feature on the streets of other areas of Prince George's County in 2005. Oh, wait a minute, I forgot that shots were fired during a recent armed holdup at the Route 197 McDonald's, and many handguns have been brandished around town pretty regularly.

The legal powers in Pee Gee County took action against those gun "hobbyists" years ago. Today, regrettably, they can rarely find the shoot-em-up idiots that are turning the county into a latter-day Dodge City. It's beyond my comprehension why the gun fanciers find it so enjoyable to go out and fire away with automatic weapons and assault rifles. I can understand, barely, that firing a pistol at a target in a shooting range might be of some interest, though a bow and arrow would be more of a challenge. What will be next, "hobbyists" tossing hand grenades?

I fired such weapons when I was in the military, and I didn't get any big charge - oops, a pun - from doing so. Fortunately, I never had to use my assault rifle to shoot another human being, despite the best efforts of my weapons officer to taunt me into using him for target practice. We were taught way back then in the musket era to kill people; that's what such weapons are made for. Trekking off to the woods to blast away at squirrels doesn't require an AK-47 or an Uzi. There is no justification for anyone other than the military - or law enforcement agencies in extraordinary situations - having these killing machines. Nor is there any reason for Joe Average to wander around carrying a pistol.

The National Rifle Association often launches pro-gun mailing efforts aimed at the media. Over the years, I've had my share of little yellow postcards, and now e-mails, trumpeting pro-gun messages. It wouldn't surprise me to one day receive a stream of such missives calling for private ownership of anti-aircraft guns. The NRA has a lot of political clout - something anti-gun lobbying groups, sadly, don't have. Our elected representatives quiver in abject fear when the NRA shakes its can of quarters and tells the gutless members of Congress to ignore the overwhelming majority of the American public that wants truly effective gun control, not Band-Aids. Let everyone in the country buy a machine gun with which to go a-huntin' in their neighborhood wooded areas. There are Bowie folks who write letters to this newspaper who would just love that, too.

The right-wing Republicans (and a handful of moderates) who now rule us in all branches of the federal government would like nothing better than to do away with the virtually ineffective gun controls now in place. Fire one for Tom DeLay and Bill Frist (a doctor, for heaven's sake). You can almost imagine many of these people bellowing, "C'mon, fellow Americans, what's wrong with assault weapons?" They're just dandy for hunting geese, if you like your bird in powder form, that is. I can't escape the nightmarish thought that one of these days Americans, or at least those wide-eyed types obsessed with guns, will be strapping six-shooters to their hips as they venture to the Giant to buy hot dogs. The weapon would be handy to keep fellow Bowieites from trying to steal your parking spot. Just shoot out their tires. Folks could step outside of local watering holes and settle an argument at 20 paces with a Colt. Republicans could shoot Democrats. The dementedly self-righteous might arm themselves with a Bible and a gun to deal with the heathens amongst us. Nah, crazy ideas, right?

There is nothing more likely to attract fiery retorts than an anti-gun column. The bullet brigade, nostrels surely flaring, will dispatch e-mails that could scorch a charcoal grill in full flame. Their right to bear arms, including, it seems, guns, rockets, tanks and maybe even missiles is guaranteed by the Constitution. Or so they like to claim. Wimps like me who disagree with them are pinko subservives and should be sent to Cuba to contemplate Fidel's beard and recite passages from the Communist Manifesto. I'm not kidding! Some of those people really think that way. It boggles the mind.

Well, I don't like seeing children shot to death. I don't like seeing anyone shot to death. Do our gun-loving friends consider this an acceptable price to pay for their racks of rifles? I lived for several years in a country - Great Britain - that bans virtually all weapons other than hunting rifles, and these are very, very tightly controlled. Even the police rarely carry handguns. I still marvel at how safe it is there. Sure, there are killings, but not on the scale we see in this country. If there's no gun handy, people think twice about offing someone. No other western nation sees as many of its citizens shot to death, outside of war, than does our own United States. Some of our cities, and even our own Prince George's County, are like war zones, thanks to the proliferation of guns. Yep, folks are using their guns to hunt, all right - each other.

When are the pols going to start listening to a large chunk of their constituents - the parents of dead children, the families of innocent people shot in the street or in their homes - and do something meaningful about gun control? How many more 17-year-olds have to die before Congress tells the NRA to go to blazes and passes effective gun control laws? Probably not in my lifetime. And the murders go on and on and on.

What a crying shame!

[email protected]

Is it even possible to pick apart all his lies in one letter?
 
Why bother? Its a waste of time to fight it out iwth small fry, IMHO.
 
How many more will die before guns are controlled?

Many, many more. And more than that, even, if you keep trying to take them.
 
Yet another of the millions of guns that scar this country like a pox has claimed a life that had barely begun.

Yep. Those mean nasty terrible awful wicked evil guns just killed another innocent victim—unless, of course, the actual killer was yet another criminal who's been paroled and put on probation time after time.

Bets, anyone?
 
I wonder how the author would explain the fact that in Maine, for example, you may carry a weapon without a permit, and that particular state has one of the lowest crime rates in the country. At the same time, in Washington D.C. it is illegal to own a weapon and it has one of (excuse me, THE) highest rate of murder in the country.

Where's the author? I'd like to ask him that question.
 
well just got done firing off an email to this yahoo, do I think it will do any good nah but I figure you got to respond to this stuff. :banghead:
 
Their spent cartridges landed in neighboring residential areas
WOT!!??? Come on now! If indeed he meant spent bullets then the guys shooting were doing gun owners no favors - would have to be fair on that point.

But oh my - the classic anti's rhetoric makes up most of the snivelling content. He forgets as do most - the guns are in bad guy's hands when things go wrong - if he can find a way to specifically target those then he might be achieving something.

Until such time - he'd better remember that he is citing minority instances and totally forgetting about the monster majority of sane responsible folks - who both have a constitutional right to have their guns and who have their right to an ability to self defence - not that he'd think that counted for anything.

Oh well - gut emotions once more rule the day and logic takes another step backward. :(
 
[email protected]

Dear Mr. Rouse:

Regarding your article: How many more will die before guns are controlled?

There is probably little point in persuading you to read the original writings of our Constitution, Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence. Even less, I suspect, of the history of arms, wars, governments and democracy. Your ignorance is worn like a badge you seem to be proud of.
 
This country's love affair with guns is sick, sick, sick.
Your love affair with controlling your neighbor is sick, sick, sick.
I recall that a few years ago a group of gun afficonados (someone less restrained than myself might call them nuts) gathered near Pointer Ridge to shoot off a slew of weapons... they were told to depart the area by police. Their spent cartridges landed in neighboring residential areas, understandably scaring the hell out of the people who lived there.
Okay, dunno if he's talking about empty cases, or bullets (didn't the Army teach you the difference between a "spent cartridge" and a bullet?). If they were putting rounds into a residential area, I doubt the police would have simply told them to leave.
It's beyond my comprehension why the gun fanciers find it so enjoyable to go out and fire away with automatic weapons and assault rifles.
Different strokes for different folks. It's called freedom.
There is no justification for anyone other than the military - or law enforcement agencies in extraordinary situations - having these killing machines. Nor is there any reason for Joe Average to wander around carrying a pistol.
You're crying to us about all the violence in the US, then you're crying there is no reason for anybody to have defensive tools. :rolleyes:
I can't escape the nightmarish thought that one of these days Americans, or at least those wide-eyed types obsessed with guns, will be strapping six-shooters to their hips as they venture to the Giant to buy hot dogs... Republicans could shoot Democrats. The dementedly self-righteous might arm themselves with a Bible and a gun to deal with the heathens amongst us. Nah, crazy ideas, right?
Yes, they are crazy ideas. They are completely unfounded in reality, and demonstrate an irrational opinion of Republicans and Christians. Furthermore, I guess you haven't been paying attention to the CCW trend across the nation for the last few years. Your crazy fears have been repeatedly spouted by like minded fools, and repeatedly discredited by the reality of responsible carry, as all the states with conceal carry have discovered.
I lived for several years in a country - Great Britain - that bans virtually all weapons other than hunting rifles, and these are very, very tightly controlled. Even the police rarely carry handguns. I still marvel at how safe it is there.
So why the hell did you come back?

What a load of BS.
 
Molon labe.

But I doubt he has the stones to try it. Like all other Marxist tyrants he would rather delegate the actual fighting and pillaging to rank and file wage slaves, while comfortably sitting in his living room sipping wine.
 
Wimps like me who disagree with them are pinko subversives and should be sent to Cuba to contemplate Fidel's beard and recite passages from the Communist Manifesto.

Well, at least he got one thing right. :D Okay, Okay maybe not sent to Cuba, but perhaps encouraged to go. :neener: :evil:
 
He should be sent to Cuba. To the nice vacation resort built on federal property where every tourist gets a koran, froot loops for breakfast, and complimentary lap dances, rap music, and free panties.

It should be his socialist version of utopia. No firearms except in the hands of government, free health care, free housing, free food, and he can play naked twister with other men and not be called names for it.
 
I'd hate to see what this guy has to say about cars and trucks that hold auto accidents at first place for cause of death in America. This guy is sick sick sick.
Perhaps he wants to ban guns so only real criminals will own, carry and deal them on our streets while doing and dealing drugs. We have a right to protect our selves from these criminals he gives examples of. There are crazies out there .
 
Ignorant, irrational bedwetter.

Why bother replying? To do so seems to be somewhere in the realm of teaching pigs to sing.


(For those who don't know - it only frustrates you and annoys the pig)
 
How many more children will die before abortion is controlled Mr. Rouse?

Don't you know that the "right" to an abortion was written into the Constitution by the founding fathers? Where have you been? :rolleyes:

But firearms? There's definatly no mention of owning them in the Constitution. Not like the language specifically, explicitly, and plainly spelling out the "right" to abortion.
 
Hi All-
"...The bullet brigade, nostrels surely flaring, will dispatch e-mails that could scorch a charcoal grill in full flame..."
Why bother trying to have an intelligent conversation about FACTS with someone who won't even bother to check their spelling on simple words like "nostrils" in their stories?

~ Blue Jays ~
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top