Elections Have Consequences

[H088]

So your for Obama? :O

 

[Nobody's_Hero]

So your [sic] for Obama?

No way man, I could never vote for someone who is anti-gun and "has 3 Islamic names."

I'm sticking with McCain, the anti-gunner with the good 'ole fashioned American name we can trust.

P.S. If that doesn't get this thread locked . . .

 

[H088]

No way man, I could never vote for someone who is anti-gun and "has 3 Islamic names."

I'm sticking with McCain, the anti-gunner with the good 'ole fashioned American name we can trust.

McCain opposed all the bans on guns, he only supported backaround checks and keeping gun locks on firearms.

What he wanted was certainly more reasonable.

I am not saying I like McCain, because I don't. I don't like any of them :/

 

[VPLthrneck]

McCain opposed all the bans on guns, he only supported backaround checks and keeping gun locks on firearms.

Looks like the only thing he has going for him. (j/k)

Now for all of those here that are thinking of voting for a 3rd party candidate or do the write-in thing. Remember Ross Perot? How do you think Der-Schlickmiester (Clinton) won in '92 and '96? All a 3rd party candidate does is split votes and thus causes the opposition to win. So if you do vote for Ron Paul or Bob Barr AND Obama wins in November--let me be the first to say "Thanks but no Thanks"

For the protection of the RKBA the down ticket candidates are just as/or more important than the top of the ticket. Please keep this in mind as you step into the voting booth in November. And once again dump the notion of 3rd party guys--there are very few "Jesse Ventura's" out there that can carry off a win.

 

[H088]

meh, as I said before all the candidates are horrible, I don't support McCain or Obama, I am just really sad its down to those two :banghead:, Wheres the candidate who has commonsense and wishes to uphold the constitution?

 

[ArfinGreebly]

Poly Ticks

Poly = many.

Ticks = blood-sucking insects.

Many blood-sucking insects = poly ticks.

I checked my manual.

Poly ticks is still not classified as activism.

Oddly, it turns out that a discussion of poly ticks is, likewise, not a discussion of activism.

And so . . . the mills grind slowly, but they grind exceedingly fine.