I heard about this on the radio today. The report I heard said the shooter had an "assault rifle and bullets taped to his chest." This report says he used a shotgun:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-georgia-fedex-shooting-20140429,0,1267118.story
Like any other mass shooting I fully expect the media to get all the details wrong and for the media to try to blame the tea party. But I only heard one breaking news alert and nothing else about it. Could it be that the media found out something that did not support their anti-gun agenda? Like maybe FedEx facilities are gun free zones? Did anyone else get this feeling today or did I just not have my radio on the right station to get the huge overflow of incorrect, misleading information, or outright lies? Did the media finally learn its lesson and just report the facts and as soon as it jumped to speculation, someone shut them up? Why was this not the top story on all the stations today? Are we finally winning the gun argument?
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-georgia-fedex-shooting-20140429,0,1267118.story
Like any other mass shooting I fully expect the media to get all the details wrong and for the media to try to blame the tea party. But I only heard one breaking news alert and nothing else about it. Could it be that the media found out something that did not support their anti-gun agenda? Like maybe FedEx facilities are gun free zones? Did anyone else get this feeling today or did I just not have my radio on the right station to get the huge overflow of incorrect, misleading information, or outright lies? Did the media finally learn its lesson and just report the facts and as soon as it jumped to speculation, someone shut them up? Why was this not the top story on all the stations today? Are we finally winning the gun argument?