Feedback on Auto-Ordnance M-1 Carbine

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rusher

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
156
Location
Gaston,NC
Hey Guys

Does anyone have any experience with them??? I held one today and it looked OK........although it is weird seeing a freshly machined M-1 Carbine.....unlike the ones from WWII that are WELL worn in.

Auto-Ordnance in the past hasnt had a great reputation.....but Kahr has them now....



Thanks for the input
Rusher
 
I got a good price on an Auto ordnance 1911, what it likes it feeds very well, otherwise jams up, first time I fired it the front sight flew off, I made another one out of a nickle using a dremel tool, they have to be staked from the inside of the frame. Last week the thing was shooting crazy, I caught the rear sight just before it disappeared, fixed it back with epoxy and then staked it with apunch in three places. My point is it most likely will need a little attention. The .45 shoots great, feeds fmjs as fast as you can fire but parts do fall off.

rk
 
The 1911 ain't the carbine. I have the carbine, totally reliable and every bit as accurate as the USGI carbines I have. I would recommend it. If you can find a USGI for $500-600 and don't mind shooting it, get that instead. I put a paratrooper stock on mine (replica) and works great.

Deez.
 
I've owned mine for about a month or two and I've put about 200 rounds through it. Shoots great and is breaking in nicely. Had a few extraction problems (as in one every few mags), but it is doing much better once I cleaned the filth out of it. The gun comes from AO on the gritty side and you will want to strip and clean all the nooks and crannies. I missed the extractor the first time around unfortunately. I haven't had a problem since I gave it a little extra attention. I've been shooting FMJ, so I don't know how well it will handle JHP or JSP, but my gun's feedramp is good and shiny so I don't think I'll have many problems.

Other than that, well the metal handguard looks like crap. I replaced mine with an Ultimak weaver rail from Fulton Armory. Much better although the aluminum Ultimak rail does get good and hot after a long string. The finish on the metal parts varies in shade. Some are light gray, others dark. I don't really mind this though, it just gives the gun character and my rail was going to be a different shade anyway.

The birch stock on the AO may be softer than GI walnut. I had to do a little sanding/cutting on it to get the rail on (which is normal BTW) and the dremel sander seemed to fly through it. I don't have a walnut stock to compare it with though. The birch stock is quite pretty though.

As for accuracy, it shoots better than I can. That isn't saying much though since my riflecraft is crap. The stock sights are great, but I put a LER pistol scope on the rail because I have horrible eyesight.

I know around here, you aren't going to get any carbine that still shoots for the same price. Anything close (within a $100-150) is usually shot to hell or a POS universal. I like the fact that it is a new gun as well. I don't feel like I am betraying a long line of GIs (or destroying collector value) by changing the gun's configuration around. This is my gun and I'll do as I please with it. I'd recommend it as long as you just want a shooter and not a historical piece.
 
Auto-Ordnance in the past hasnt had a great reputation.....but Kahr has them now....
From what I've heard, the quality of the carbines (thompsons) got worse when Kahr acquired AO, and the 1911 line got a little better...
 
From what I've heard, the quality of the carbines (thompsons) got worse when Kahr acquired AO, and the 1911 line got a little better...
From what I understand they didn't start making the M1 carbines until after Kahr took over, so how they could have gotten "worse" is beyond me.
 
From what I understand they didn't start making the M1 carbines until after Kahr took over, so how they could have gotten "worse" is beyond me.

You are correct.
 
A lot of my friends won't go anywhere near an M1911A1 that's got the "Auto-Ordnance" name on it. I guess their older reputation lives on with a great many folks.

I've never handled one so I can't speak to the subject myself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top