harrygunner
Member
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2006
- Messages
- 1,045
It doesn't matter why one is unaware of what's going on around them. It's still "Condition White".
Ok. If you say this is a false dilemma of extremes, I guess it must be. However, my observations of people tell me that this is not so. The things I've read and observed about the inability of the human brain to truly multi-task tell me this is not so (LINK). I believe that you can really be "present" either in the place and moment of the here-and-now, or you can be attending the event, or concert, or discussion(podcast) going on inside your head, thanks to your earbuds or earphones, but not both. The tendency to insert a focus of attention into your consciousness WILL drive out competing inputs -- like footsteps approaching, the speech and shouted warnings of others, car horns honking, dogs barking, and all sorts of very important warning signals.There's false dilemmas of two extremes here, from the assumptions that the choice is between 360 turns and obliviousness to everything behind you to the choice between not using an audio device and completely removing one of your senses.
And that's a fine thing to say. But I've watched people using these devices and used them myself many times. I've yet to find anyone who does so in such a moderated, toned-down way as to not hider to a very significant degree the inputs they're receiving from the world around them.People can use them as sensory deprivation devices(which this thread has discussed). Individuals should make their own judgements of their usage pertaining to the applicability of the statements.
I feel that your eyes are about 20 times more likely to i.d. the threat than your ears. For this reason, I listen to music with one earbud in, so that I can carry conversations
I like music, but if I felt the need to listen to it constantly, I would see about how to change that.Posted by MyGreenGuns: I listen to music constantly.
Try to restrict the time spent each day listening to music through earphones, particularly earbuds. When not on the train, or in circumstances that make it impossible to listen to music any other way, play your music through speakers. If you must use earphones, take at least a five-minute rest each hour. This will provide the ears with valuable recovery time and could help reduce the risk of hearing impairment in the long term.
Good thing!I've always kept my right ear uncovered and the volume low when in public. I've never walked into a pole or stepped in front of a car,
Of course, both of those are matters of opinion.... Do you have any objective basis for either?I maintain good situational awareness. I totally disagree with those of you who believe listening to music puts everyone in condition white.
Same thing in my experience....I have seen so many people put on their music and tune out the world and could never understand how they could do that. I see it most often with cell phones and bluetooth.
That in itself certainly seems like a good reason to not use the thing.I do have experiences with being profiled by predators who assume I am not paying attention.
As Sam said in Post #22,My attention to the world gave me confidence when I started to carry a handgun.
Uh huh! The meme of "gun as talisman." I have a gun so nothing will happen to me. Or, I have a gun so I'll be able to respond somehow if I need to. This is a pervasive mindset fault that is waaay too common.
^I love music. I wouldnt want to correct my behavior any more than I would want to stop carrying a gun. There is much truth to the excerpt you included, which is why I quit using earbuds and listen to my music quietly.I like music, but if I felt the need to listen to it constantly, I would see about how to change that.
"I maintain good situational awareness." I spent my youth excessively-multitasking with everything I did. To this day I find it easy to keep track of the various inputs in my life. I make a good supervisor at work because I can keep tabs on my 7 employees and their task load as well as my own work. When I relax at home I am playing xbox, listening to music, reading THR and sometimes watching a movie. Most people focus on one item at a time, I just find it easy to do all of them at once. I know this is not normal of most folk however.Of course, both of those are matters of opinion.... Do you have any objective basis for either?
^Its also a good reason not to drive a nice car, or have expensive things, or go outside after dark, or have windows on the ground level of your home. (Not being sarcastic: The house I'm building does not have windows at ground level.)That in itself certainly seems like a good reason to not use the thing.
I agree with Sam, but that was not what I was saying. I know who he was talking about. Its the people who buy a gun and feel that they are somehow impervious to attack, or that they will always have a strategic advantage over a bad guy.As Sam said in Post #22,
Worth noting is the sources of the distraction referenced in that article. The injury statistics from the hospitals are for walking and phoning, with some specific incidents of texting. Of the headphones and vehicles accidents, it mentions missing the warning sound emitted by the vehicle. Not so much of a problem to people who are using headphones in a manner which still permits them to hear.
Many of us recognize that we cannot know when we may need to defend ourselves, so we make it a practice to carry when we can. Many of us also believe that if one would not go somewhere unarmed because of a perception of a higher than usual level of risk, it is prudent to not go there at all, if it can be avoided in any way. For example, I do not go here at all; I have first-hand knowledge that the statements that the area had become "virtually problem free" were erroneous, and I believe them to have been self serving.