SSN Vet
Member
I always hear this statement, and it begs the question,”Why?”.
If another pistol is better, for the same price, why would a Colt hold value better?
Not singling you out, I just hear it often and the logic does not fit my brain.
I'll share a (somewhat) related anecdote:
I used to hang out quite a bit on the 1911Pro forum before it was shut down. This was an insiders forum made up of the top rated pistol smiths (you had to be approved to join, so I'm not not sure why they let me in. Probably because I said "please") and they shared a lot of detailed build info. and heavy technical stuff (lots of pics of how they did their milling machine set ups, how they measured parts, etc....). Really cool stuff, even if most of it was a bit over my head. The opinion there seemed uniform that if a customer wanted a full custom job done on their pistol, they wanted the customer to acquire and send them a Colt to build on.
I think historically there are more Colts out there and their geometry is the base line from which most aftermarket parts are designed. So they have more confidence that things will fit correctly with minimal fitting or additional machining.
When the Remington came out with their R1, one of the smiths there did a full build on it and detailed having to do a lot of extra work to get everything fitting correctly. He turned out a beautiful gun in the end, but it was a longer, harder path to get there.