Gonna get a new powder measure

Status
Not open for further replies.

JohnM

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
1,640
Location
Down there by the river
I think I want a new Redding.
Mostly for handgun loads, don't think I need a BR model, but I want one that will cut flake accurately.
I'll probably stick with my RCBS for rifle and easy to meter powders.
Any of you Redding guys have a preference for a measure? :D
 
After eons of reloading, I finally upgraded to Redding Model 3.
Only issue is - why did I wait so long?
The micrometer function is awesome. Can go back to a previously noted setting.
With the pistol micrometer in there, it throws tiny charges very well.
I use the rifle one for Trail Boss and large 44 magnum loads.
Get the baffle. Cheap and helps a lot to even things out.
To speed things up even more, I made an Excel spreadsheet with average charge weights with my powders at each 5 on the 0-100 micrometer. That gets me close quickly when making up new loads.
 
I have been using the standard Redding #3 model with the handgun metering chamber in it for years. Works fine with all the handgun powders I've used.

Don
 
I don't know anything about a Redding because I have never used one. I own 3 of the Lee Pro Auto Disk. I prefer them over the Uniflo I used to have & the LNL I still have.
 
I believe its the "benchrest" or "10-X" models which come with the baffle standard.

Yes, the standard #3 powder measure does not come with a baffle, but Redding sells just the baffle, and I ordered one and installed it in mine.

Don
 
I have two Redding 10-Xs, one is modified for use on a Hornady L-N-L. I got the first 10 plus years ago specifically for handgun cartridges. I like them very much.

I use other powder measures for rifle cartridges although I would not hesitate to get another Redding.

I am a firm believer in powder baffles and feel they need to be oriented a particular way to work well. The line of the baffle peak needs to be 90 degrees to the rotational axis of the drum so the holes in the baffle are not over the metering cavity. But not everyone agrees with that assessment.

While I am also a believer in the micrometer heads, it really does not make the measure any more accurate. It does make it easier to adjust and easier to return to a particular charge.

At least with the 10-X, the adjustment stem has a hemispherical cavity in it, versus flat of the adjustment stem in the other measures that I have, and that seams to improve the accuracy of the powder measure.
 
Last edited:
I've had a Redding #3 with rifle and pistol micrometers since the late '70's. Floating around the Web is a PDF file of baffle templates for various diameter tubes. I made my baffle from heating duct sheet metal, a bit thick but it's what I had.
 
I've been using a Redding forever. When I bought my LNL AP press I started thinking about modifying the Redding to put on it. I decided to just try the LNL measure first and it is just as accurate as my tried and true Redding.

Either one of these would be my choice.

I tried the Lee, RCBS and Lyman. Gave all of those away.
 
There are not many powder measures I do not have, from Ohaus to Herters cam operated, collet and dial o ‘matics’, I have RCBS Little Dandy and Uniflows, cost? The Little Dandy with 20+ rotors is an investment.

I purchased two Uniflow rotors, $10.00 each/large and small at the last Dallas Market Hall Gun Show, somewhere in all that reloading equipment is a Uniflow measure without rotors.

I get good results from the Lyman 55, the old design and the newer design, RCBS Little Dandy and the Ohaus, the Ohaus is unique because the rotor is reversible, when removed and rotated 180 degrees the rotor can be used for pistol and or rifle and it runs as smooth as if it was made of glass.

Somewhere, put away with the press that looks like a spider doing push ups I have a B&M powder measure, it may not be the same one everyone is talking about, reminds me going out of town and being told the best place to have breakfasts is............and they finish with “You ‘gotta’ eat there”, nothing beats a ‘trickler’, and then there is the ‘the best’, it is always something we do not have or it is too expensive.

And I have Dillon powder measures and adapters for changing RCBS powder measures to Dillon presses, and powder bars, I have lots of powder bars, and I match case head stamps and cases by weight. I loaded 250 30/06 cases on a Dillon 550B, when finished there was 23 grains difference between the heaviest and lightest round, 23 grains of powder could render my rifles scrap, I weighed the components, recorded the difference between cases as in lightest and heaves, Winchester cases were the lightest of the 5 groups of cases, military type cases were the heaviest, the 23 grains difference was caused by the weight of the case. Most would wonder why someone would go to the trouble.

There is no reason for me to load mixed brass with different weights, after loading X number of rounds the + and or – difference is a very small spread, I can weigh a random number of loaded rounds are all of them, there is very lottle spread.



F. Guffey
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top