I get it, but I won’t use their stuff on guns. I cant imagine the screw-buggering that would result from trying.Actually, I have a lot of Harbor Freight tools in my garage and they've been great. Saved a lot of money over the years too. I know other brands are better quality, but if you don't really need that better quality, what's the point? If I used them every day, was a mechanic by trade, I wouldn't be using Harbor Freight stuff. But for just hobby use, they're fine. But I hear what you're saying 100%. You get what you pay for. It's just a matter of, do you need to pay more for something you may not really need. That's a harder question and more subjective as well.
I have a GP100 in .357 magnum. I'm not sure how well that would do against a larger animal. Maybe it would work if you hit them in the right spot. It's a really nice gun though and I'd hate to just toss it in a bag or something. It's also the 6" barrel version which isn't the easiest to carry around. The 4" would be a lot better for that. I got the GP100 a couple years ago as a treat to myself when I got a bonus at work. I shoot mostly .38 special with it at the range, but I bring some .357 each time and fire some of those too just to wake everyone up at the range. Last time I was at the range I brought my Maverick 88 12 gauge and fired some slugs. I think everyone turned around to see what that was haha!
I'm sure the Ruger and S&W are nicer. The GP100 I have is an awesome gun. It's a big huge sturdy thing that looks great and shoots great. No doubt it could handle thousands of .357 through it without a hiccup. It's built like a tank. I was just thinking of picking up the Taurus since it's on the cheaper side and it appears to get decent reviews (the Tracker anyway). I'll have to think about it some more.
The Tracker line is one of the most robust revolvers that Taurus makes. Despite all the trash talk, I expect it would work well for your intended purpose. A woods/trail revolver, IMHO, should be a DA. Gives you the advantage of shooting it SA for more accuracy when you have time, yet is quicker, simpler and easier to shoot fast when needed. Ruger and S&W make fine revolvers too, but you pay a little more for the name and reputation. I have a couple of 629s and have shot the snot out of them with zero issues. If I were to buy another, odds are it would be another Smith....but that's just me and my preference.I looked at the Taurus .44 Tracker but heard mixed reviews about that gun.
That's scary! Good thing you didn't get hurt! I would lose faith in their products if that happened to me as well, can't blame you.I get it, but I won’t use their stuff on guns. I cant imagine the screw-buggering that would result from trying.
When my Central Machinery belt-disc sander had the spinning metal disc fail at the collar and shoot right past my left ear on its way out of the garage and across the street, my faith in their products was greatly diminished. (I’ve had Pittsburgh stuff wilt under use, too.) My only remaining HF tools are a bench grinder and dozens of clamps. Other than these items, i will pass.
Your GP would be a good companion to take. My 4” GP .357 is certainly a fine bullet launcher that I know will send stoutly loaded 180 gr .358 bullets downrange with ease.
Good luck with your search.
Stay safe.
The Ruger Blackhawks are SA only right? Or are they DA?The Ruger Super Blackhawk with 5.5" barrel is a great woods gun, especially when loaded with Skeeter Skelton loads (240 gr LSWC over 7.5 gr of Unique in a .44 Spl case).
View attachment 1188276
If I am in your shoes, I will take a long, hard look at Ruger NMBH, or Bisley, Convertible; 45 Colt, 45 ACP, but large frame, not a Flattop. Stainless, of course. First, if you are hiking, you want to have something powerful enough to defend yourself from larger four legs predators. If your firearm is enough against those, in that case it is more than enough against two legs predators. But, before going any further, make a note: FACTORY AMMUNITION ONLY, NO HANDLOADS. In case you have to defend yourself on the court, this will save you from a lot of trouble, see what Massad Ayoob has to say https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpHAgBL4tf8 . If you are not going to face large bear, just cougar, black bear or large aggressive dog, there is one excellent load 45 Supper from Buffalo Bore; 255 flat nose, hard cast at 1090 fps. This one is from 5" 1911, but it should be very close from 4.62" or 5.5" revolver. Noted load will go right through even full grown cow, see more here, #1 post in https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/revolver-for-handgun-hunting-another-view.903836/ . If you need more punch, Buffalo Bore has those in 45 Colt https://www.buffalobore.com/index.php?l=product_list&c=146 .Looking around at .44 magnum revolvers. Thinking of getting one sometime in the near future. What are some good ones out there that aren't a small fortune?
Not looking for a super fancy good looking one. Just one I could carry with me for hiking/camping, etc.
I looked at the Taurus .44 Tracker but heard mixed reviews about that gun. My one buddy said to stay away from Taurus. Others seem to think they're fine. I know Ruger and S&W make some nice ones but they're pretty pricey. Just curious what folks have on here and their experiences.
I'll check those out. We'll be going to Yellowstone park this summer. I highly doubt I'll run in to anything, but I don't think my little .380 carry gun will do much to a larger animal, so I was thinking of picking up something a little more powerful to carry along with me just in case. I figured a .44 magnum would be pretty effective in most situations. Ideally, I'd like to be able to carry my 12 gauge with slugs in it but I'm not sure how well that would go over with other people there or the park rangers haha!If I am in your shoes, I will take a long, hard look at Ruger NMBH, or Bisley, Convertible; 45 Colt, 45 ACP, but large frame, not a Flattop. Stainless, of course. First, if you are hiking, you want to have something powerful enough to defend yourself from larger four legs predators. If your firearm is enough against those, in that case it is more than enough against two legs predators. But, before going any further, make a note: FACTORY AMMUNITION ONLY, NO HANDLOADS. In case you have to defend yourself on the court, this will save you from a lot of trouble, see what Massad Ayoob has to say https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpHAgBL4tf8 . If you are not going to face large bear, just cougar, black bear or large aggressive dog, there is one excellent load 45 Supper from Buffalo Bore; 255 flat nose, hard cast at 1090 fps. This one is from 5" 1911, but it should be very close from 4.62" or 5.5" revolver. Noted load will go right through even full grown cow, see more here, #1 post in https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/revolver-for-handgun-hunting-another-view.903836/ . If you need more punch, Buffalo Bore has those in 45 Colt https://www.buffalobore.com/index.php?l=product_list&c=146 .
Another advantage of 45 over 44 is you have bigger dia bullet, and less muzzle blast. And before you take your revolver out, I would definitely bring it to a good smith to go over it, and make sure that Loctite is applied on all screws.
LOL!Realistically I shouldn't even be thinking about getting another gun, but you know how that goes haha!
This is going directly against what I said in my above post (post #62 this thread) about dreaming up a "realistic" reason for needing another gun, but the fact of the matter is, in Yellowstone the largest "animal" you're most likely to have a run in with walks on two legs. And if your "little .380 carry gun" is "powerful" enough for one of those critters, you're good to go (to Yellowstone) already.We'll be going to Yellowstone park this summer. I highly doubt I'll run in to anything, but I don't think my little .380 carry gun will do much to a larger animal, so I was thinking of picking up something a little more powerful to carry along with me just in case.
That's the truth isn't it? People are worse than animals. We moved out to the country to get away from people and the congestion.This is going directly against what I said in my above post (post #62 this thread) about dreaming up a "realistic" reason for needing another gun, but the fact of the matter is, in Yellowstone the largest "animal" you're likely most likely to have a run in with walks on two legs. And if your "little .380 carry gun" is "powerful" enough for one of those critters, you're good to go (to Yellowstone) already.
Cool, thanks for all the tips/advice!
I'm not looking to spend a fortune to have a fancy looking gun, just wanted to see if I could pick up something at a reasonable price that could handle .44 magnums. It sounds like the Tracker should work for my intended purpose, with the understanding that it's not going to be as nice as a Smith or Ruger.
I think a new Smith or Ruger is out of the question as they're just too pricey. I have other hobbies that take up some $$$ so I have to try and stay on some sort of budget. Realistically I shouldn't even be thinking about getting another gun, but you know how that goes haha!
I'll keep my eye out for a nice used Smith or Ruger. It'll have to either be a used Smith/Ruger or a new Taurus. Around $500-600 is about all I really want to spend at the moment.
Absolutely!This .44 would fit the bill without breaking the bank and I could bring it along on our trip for a made up reason as to why I needed it.
Yep, my wife and I live "out of town" also, and seeing as how we're only about 170 miles south of Yellowstone, we drive up through there every couple of years. In our opinions, Grand Teton National Park (on the southern border of Yellowstone) is prettier. And Glasier National Park (in northern Montana) beats both Yellowstone and Grand Teton as far a scenery goes.That's the truth isn't it? People are worse than animals. We moved out to the country to get away from people and the congestion.
That's cool! It's really pretty out that way. We went out to South Dakota back in 2021 for a family trip and really enjoyed it out there. We made it into Wyoming to check out Devil's Tower. I could easily move out to Wyoming or somewhere in that area. Very pretty and not many people. I don't know how people live in places like NYC, so many people in such little space! We live in Southern Michigan out in farm land. Lots of dirt roads and stuff. We used to live just south of Detroit in the suburbs and while it was a nice area, we got tired of being stacked on top of each other on our little lots.Absolutely!
Yep, my wife and I live "out of town" also, and seeing as how we're only about 170 miles south of Yellowstone, we drive up through there every couple of years. In our opinions, Grand Teton National Park (on the southern border of Yellowstone) is prettier. And Glasier National Park (in northern Montana) beats both Yellowstone and Grand Teton as far a scenery goes.
At any rate, when it comes to congestion, in Yellowstone you're almost sure to see two types of it: one type of congestion in Yellowstone is called "a bear jam," and the other type is called "a bison jam." Naturally, both types of "jams" are caused by tourists stopping to view (and take pictures of) the critters, and there's often a couple or 3 park rangers with shotguns loaded with bean bags (or so I've been told) nearby. You probably don't want to be showing off your new 44 (or your old 380) if you're stuck in a bear jam or a bison jam in Yellowstone.
Oh, and BTW, the "bear jams" in Yellowstone are almost always the result of a black beat - not a grizzly. Our youngest daughter spent two summers working in Yellowstone when she was in college, and in all that time, I don't think she saw more than 2 or 3 grizzlies. As luck would have it though, she was with my wife and me when we spotted a grizzly in Glasier once when we were all three up there. There was a "bear jam" with park rangers on scene that time too.