Prince Yamato
Member
As some of you may know from my other posts, I am a fan of GQ Magazine. I like reading about new fashions and current trends in clothing. Some of this is because I have a broad artistic side and some of this is because I like to wear my gun under something other than a Hawaiian shirt. At any rate, one of the first sections I turn to in GQ is The Style Guy. The columnist is Glenn O'Brien, an individual I know nothing about personally except for the fact that he has good fashion sense, except in one area apparently. In the July issue of GQ, an article comes in from a gun owner in Alabama. I could not find the article online, so I will type it in its entirety here on the forum:
OK, what the hell? Now, the funny thing is, the British edition of this magazine has a shooting section devoted to things like proper attire for skeet and hunting- and no, it's not mossy oak.
I respect this guy's opinion on things like white shoes, cardigans, and suits, but where does he get the gall to go from dictating fashion laws to dictating firearms laws? The question asked was clearly, "what are the fashion laws concerning carrying a firearm?" I guess I'm just ranting here. Well, I guess it's Esquire for me from now on!
Packing Advice
> I have a permit to carry a concealed weapon in Alabama. I wear a Springfield Armory 1911 EMP chambered in nine milimeters. (I carry hollowpoints of course). It's a pretty sexy gun. It looks great with a suit or with ranch gear. What's the GQ view on concealed firearms?
>>I always felt a little uneasy dining in a certain famous Chinese restaurant in New York when it filled with hip-hop personalities, as it often did. I found myself closely examining both the wine list and potential lines of fire. I think what everyone overlooks when discussing the Second Amendment today is that its writers were actually concerned with dirks, sabers, cudgels, and muzzle-loaders, not semiautomatic weapons. I guess I'd be okay with concealed muzzle-loaders, but I would generally prefer an unarmed population, including John Law and you. I prefer words as lethal weapons.
OK, what the hell? Now, the funny thing is, the British edition of this magazine has a shooting section devoted to things like proper attire for skeet and hunting- and no, it's not mossy oak.
I respect this guy's opinion on things like white shoes, cardigans, and suits, but where does he get the gall to go from dictating fashion laws to dictating firearms laws? The question asked was clearly, "what are the fashion laws concerning carrying a firearm?" I guess I'm just ranting here. Well, I guess it's Esquire for me from now on!