Joejojoba111
Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2005
- Messages
- 1,056
Cheat!
We should have realized it earlier! BTW is it illegal to talk about election fruad? Because aiui it's always been around. Not just Jerrymandering, but outright cheating. That's why they have the safeguards they do, because they know people would cheat if it was easy enough.
So, working on the assumption that the winner of the election isn't decided before the ballots are cast, I don't think that either party is above trying to cheat. So it's non partisan here.
I heard some D's talking about hard-drives that went missing, and hard-drives that simply filled-up with votes and couldn't accept any more. And most incriminating was some exit polls they were talking about where Krry had a lead, and supposedly exit polls never lie, and then Bsh overtook him in a sudden rush of votes.
Just for argument, you could switch the names and it wouldn't matter, afaic. So if we pretend that cheating can and does happen. Why waste time planning violent revolution, when, in theory, a 3rd party could cheat too, and suddenly the hard-drives are too full to accept more votes, and the exit polls don't conform to the hard-drive tallys
Just assuming what if, just what if it was possible that cheating could happen, which I don't suggest has or can or ever will.
Especially not with Kennedy and the mafia and teamsters.
We should have realized it earlier! BTW is it illegal to talk about election fruad? Because aiui it's always been around. Not just Jerrymandering, but outright cheating. That's why they have the safeguards they do, because they know people would cheat if it was easy enough.
So, working on the assumption that the winner of the election isn't decided before the ballots are cast, I don't think that either party is above trying to cheat. So it's non partisan here.
I heard some D's talking about hard-drives that went missing, and hard-drives that simply filled-up with votes and couldn't accept any more. And most incriminating was some exit polls they were talking about where Krry had a lead, and supposedly exit polls never lie, and then Bsh overtook him in a sudden rush of votes.
Just for argument, you could switch the names and it wouldn't matter, afaic. So if we pretend that cheating can and does happen. Why waste time planning violent revolution, when, in theory, a 3rd party could cheat too, and suddenly the hard-drives are too full to accept more votes, and the exit polls don't conform to the hard-drive tallys
Just assuming what if, just what if it was possible that cheating could happen, which I don't suggest has or can or ever will.
Especially not with Kennedy and the mafia and teamsters.
