Grip medallions or not? That is the question…

styles

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Messages
246
I see a lot of grips that I like on the Rugers. Usually, my eye is drawn to stag with light bark or aged ivory-like magna or holly Wood. I keep waffling on medallions. Doest it make sense they look better in a bisley grip and not as much on xr3 grips?
 
No right or wrong answer there... whatever you think looks better is what you should go with. Personally I'm not a fan of medallions on any 1873-style gun, but I like how they look on my N frame Model 29.
 
It see it as a personal opinion. I like them on Ruger SA's but don't care either way on other guns. I usually make new grips for most of my Ruger's and have been known to punch out the medallions from factor grips to use them in my home made grips.
 
I think I prefer no medallions. Though both of my Ruger single actions have factory grips with medallions. The Blackhawk that I carry constantly has a lot of wear on the left side medallion due to sweat. That grip is darker than the other as well.
 
I’m with @chicharrones on this. Some guns look great with them, some without.
I like the bronze looking ones on the grips that came with my S&W 25-15. I don’t like gaudy and these are not. Also they’re not very big:
1707798267370.jpeg

When i ordered my service panels from Altamont for my model 10 I didn’t realize they would have silver medallions. At first I wasn’t to keen on them, but once the panels were on the gun I liked them.
1707798526281.jpeg

I installed Altamont Ropers on my models 17 & 19. They don’t have medallions and i think they look great.
Here’s the model 17-3
1707798670910.jpeg

On my single actions i prefer no medallions.
1707798795313.jpeg
 
If I can get factory medallions for S&W, Ruger, or Colt then I will have them put on.

Other than that I can be okay with my faux ivory grips without medallions.
wC1k9vR.jpg

4oiBy1a.jpg

lfYs7m5.jpg

4HZq7FJ.jpg
 
When i ordered my service panels from Altamont for my model 10 I didn’t realize they would have silver medallions. At first I wasn’t to keen on them, but once the panels were on the gun I liked them.
View attachment 1194322
Does Altamont call those Sevice Stocks? I ask because they are similar to what S&W calls the Magna Stock which they introduced in 1935 on the Registered Magnum and the following year on the rest of the N frames.

IMG_0271.jpeg
These two 45 Hand Ejectors are wearing what S&W calls Service Stocks.

IMG_0581.jpeg
IMG_0502.jpeg

Kevin
 
Does Altamont call those Sevice Stocks? I ask because they are similar to what S&W calls the Magna Stock which they introduced in 1935 on the Registered Magnum and the following year on the rest of the N frames.
No, it’s my bad habit of calling them that. Altamont calls them “Classic Panels”. They do have “Service Panels” that look just like Magna grips. I am pretty sure they supply them for S&W for their overseas contract revolvers, like for Hong Kong.
 
Same gun without and with medallions. I wanted to add a little Colt snobbery to it, but I can go either way when it comes to medallions.
 

Attachments

  • 20240112_154245.jpg
    20240112_154245.jpg
    122 KB · Views: 3
  • 20240125_131344.jpg
    20240125_131344.jpg
    130.7 KB · Views: 3
styles
@bannockburn are the medallions that popular grip makers here use ‘factory’?
Grashorn, Chig, Texas, Sacks?
I couldn't tell you as I never have had any grips made by these grip makers.

Maybe write or call them and see what they say. Numrich (gunpartscorp.com) sells them for a number of different gun manufacturers, as does Amazon.
 
I like both, depending. I've seen ivories/wood/stag with medallions that I liked, and ivories/wood/stag without that I liked. IMO medallions make a grip look more "factory" and sans medallions looks more aftermarket/custom. In general I prefer SAA-type and 1911 grips without, but I also like some with.
 
Back
Top