Guess Who's a Gun Owner?

[Jeb Stuart]

I am guessing it is a political ploy or strategy. This woman, Kamala, Kawala, Kaola, Kamoa or what ever the "F" is her name, is just a Obama in skirts.Probably related to the sorry SOB. A profound liar, and would be a deadly cancer to America.
Guns
Harris earned an "F" rating from the National Rifle Association for her consistent efforts supporting gun control.[204] While serving as district attorney in San Francisco, Harris, along with other district attorneys, filed an amicus brief in District of Columbia v. Heller, arguing that the Washington, D.C., gun law at issue did not violate the Second Amendment.[205] In her second term as district attorney, she said that getting guns off the streets was a priority.[206]

During her run for Senate, Harris was endorsed by former U.S. Representative Gabby Giffords, shot in Tucson in 2011. She was also endorsed by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.[207]

In response to the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, Harris supported the call for more gun control. Saying that she believed that thoughts and prayers are inadequate answers to the shooting, she stated that "...we must also commit ourselves to action. Another moment of silence won't suffice."[208][209]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris#Guns

 

[Deanimator]

Good news. This hurts her as a contender in the primary -- and I see her as appalling for her 4th as well as 2nd amendment views. And may be another example of democratic hypocrisy to mid-American voters.

Remember too that her office defended the use of a forged confession in a criminal trial on the premise that it didn't violate the defendant's civil rights because he wasn't "tortured". That's despicable in an infinity of ways.

 

[Spats McGee]

This is really nothing new. The political elites have a very, very long history of making laws for us but carving out exemptions for themselves. Because they're special....

 

[Sovblocgunfan]

This is really nothing new. The political elites have a very, very long history of making laws for us but carving out exemptions for themselves. Because they're special....

...in a special kind of way.

Listen, those of you who are sweet on o’rourke should reconsider. He says whatever the polls tell him to say. In the past he has voiced support for a new AWB, stated he wants to raise the minimum age to buy a gun of any kind to 21 (cigarette, anyone?), UBC’s (i get some of us have no issue with this) and other stuff. At the moment he is softening his position to gain support from moderates who might throw some votes his way. Don’t expect it to be the norm.

 

[GAF]

Their attitude is like this, Be free little people, go eat cake!

 

[GEM]

A GOP president or presidential candidate would never support an AWB or use executive powers to ban things. GOP legislators would push progun legislation as vigorously as they go after Obamacare, immigrants, tax cuts, anti-abortion measures. Yes , they would - send a check.

 

[P5 Guy]

 

[BLB68]

Giffords was pretty pro-gun for a Democrat until she was shot. I'm not sure how much of her post-shooting anti-gun campaign is her or her husband's doing, for that matter, due to the brain injury.

 

[GEM]

Such things happen. Diane was traumatizes by the Harvey Milk shooting. Some don’t flip like Dr. Gratia-Hupp or Rep. Scalise. The Donald was bumped to the wrong side.

It’s irrational. I had a friend whose Marines father wouldn't go to the Chinese restaurant because of Pearl Harbor.

 

[Robert]

As others have said, this is nothing new.