win71
Member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2005
- Messages
- 694
I'm not personally going to comment on this for a couple reasons. One, I lived in the community and two, I was a member of the club. Since I was nine miles out to sea fishing for salmon at the time of the incident I have no other information.
It is fairly common for Cal Fire to bill a responsibility party in any fire they respond to if negligent or illegal activity is the proximate cause. Lawn mower blades hitting rocks causing sparks, dozer blades scrapping rocks, safety chains dragging on the highway, you name it.
For those reasons this action is not out of the normal operating procedures for that agency.
It is fairly common for Cal Fire to bill a responsibility party in any fire they respond to if negligent or illegal activity is the proximate cause. Lawn mower blades hitting rocks causing sparks, dozer blades scrapping rocks, safety chains dragging on the highway, you name it.
For those reasons this action is not out of the normal operating procedures for that agency.
$6 million suit against gun club for '06 fire
By AMY GITTELSOHN
The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection seeks more than $6.3 million in a lawsuit against the Weaverville Rod & Gun Club and individuals in the club for Cal Fire's costs in fighting and investigating the 2006 Junction Fire that started at the Junction City Rifle Range.
The July 29, 2006, Junction Fire started during an NRA-sanctioned service rifle shoot held at the range. The fire burned 3,126 acres of Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Forest Service and private lands, and it destroyed one residential structure.
The range is on BLM land leased by the county. In addition to use by the gun club and the public, Trinity County deputies use the range for target practice.
The complaint filed through the state Attorney General's Office at the Trinity County Courthouse alleges that the gun club was negligent in failing to maintain dry brush at the range. It also refers to negligent firing of "illegal incendiary tracer rounds and/or full-metal jacketed rounds into, or adjacent to, dry vegetation during fire season."
While that "and/or" statement contains some ambiguity, a part of the complaint specifically naming club member ********** states that ****'s son "fired ammunition commonly known as tracer or incendiary ammunition into a dry brush-covered area," and that ****** gave him the ammunition.
It also states that *******, as the designated range master, should not have been participating in the rifle shoot.
******* adamantly denies any use of tracer rounds, which are illegal in California.
"I'm telling you and I'm telling everybody else, I would never allow tracer rounds to be fired," he said.
******** added that his home was searched after the fire and there was nothing to support the allegation - just something vague about a microscopic paint chip on a used firearm he bought that "could have been" consistent with red tips of incendiary rounds. He noted that he has not been criminally charged.
It's true, he said, that fullmetal jacketed ammunition was used (not armor piercing), and this is consistent with a military service rifle shoot.
"I was broken-hearted when they came and searched my house," he said.