Library Guy
Member
For discussion: Guns that should have changed things but didn’t. I’m not talking about crazy designs like the gyrojet or the Webley-Fosbery, but rather, firearms that pointed the way to future trends but didn’t lead the way. The ones that almost made it… I’ll give some examples to get things going.
The Ferguson Rifle- A British breech loading rifle circa 1776. Its major fault was that it wasn’t a muzzle loading smooth bore. Okay, so it was expensive and a little delicate. But the Brits showed no interest in making it work better…
M1895 Lee Navy Rifle- Straight pull repeater firing a 6mm smokeless rimless cartridge. It looked so good on paper! 135 grain bullet at 2500 fps. Those numbers sound familiar don’t they?
H&K VP70z- A synthetic frame, striker fired, double action only, 9mm with an 18 round magazine. Gosh, should’ve set the firearms world on its ear. But it was up to Glock to make plastic respectable. No wonder H&K thinks we suck.
Others? Feel free to discuss and argue.
The Ferguson Rifle- A British breech loading rifle circa 1776. Its major fault was that it wasn’t a muzzle loading smooth bore. Okay, so it was expensive and a little delicate. But the Brits showed no interest in making it work better…
M1895 Lee Navy Rifle- Straight pull repeater firing a 6mm smokeless rimless cartridge. It looked so good on paper! 135 grain bullet at 2500 fps. Those numbers sound familiar don’t they?
H&K VP70z- A synthetic frame, striker fired, double action only, 9mm with an 18 round magazine. Gosh, should’ve set the firearms world on its ear. But it was up to Glock to make plastic respectable. No wonder H&K thinks we suck.
Others? Feel free to discuss and argue.