Gunshot Sensors in D.C.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mainsail

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
3,252
Location
Washington
Gunshot Sensors Are Giving D.C. Police Jump on Suspects
System Can Determine Location of Crime


By Allison Klein
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, October 22, 2006; Page A01

The crack of gunshots can be heard nearly every night in some of the District's deadliest neighborhoods -- and no longer just by the people within shooting range.

The sounds are being picked up by the police department's newest tool: ShotSpotter, a network of noise sensors that identifies and pinpoints gunfire. Over the past few weeks, the technology has guided police to three homicides in Southeast Washington, and in one case officers got there rapidly enough to make an arrest.

ShotSpotter, a network of sound sensors in Southeast Washington, sends an immediate signal to police dispatchers. (By Michael Robinson-chavez -- The Washington Post)

A Sound System
ShotSpotter systems are new to the District but have been used in other cities to track and monitor gunfire. Sensors, about the size of coffee cans, detect the sound of gunfire within two miles. The system pinpoints the location of gunfire.

It determines whether the shooter is moving and calculates the direction and speed of travel.

Audio is immediately and permanently archived for forensic analysis or court proceedings.

Software distinguishes gunfire from such noises as car backfires so police don't respond to false alarms.

ShotSpotter complements 48 surveillance cameras installed in many city neighborhoods. But unlike the cameras, which are checked after the fact, ShotSpotter gets word to police as soon as bullets start flying -- in many cases before anyone has a chance to call 911. Over the past two months, the sensors, roughly the size of coffee cans, have been hidden atop buildings in many sections of Southeast Washington.

The sensors picked up one of the fatal shootings last Monday, sending an immediate signal to police at their downtown operations center. Authorities raced to the 2600 block of Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE, where they found the body of landscaper Jose Villatoro, who was fatally shot while he was cutting grass. The swift response led to the arrest of a suspect a few blocks away.

The ShotSpotter technology can identify gunfire within two miles, police officials said. And it can pinpoint, within feet, where the shots were fired from, they said. The system isn't a panacea: It won't prevent shootings and relies on police having the personnel and wherewithal to quickly react. But it has the potential to make an impact.

"We get there sooner, which means we're more likely to catch the person responsible," Police Chief Charles H. Ramsey said. "For an injured person, it can be the difference between living and dying."

The technology behind the ShotSpotter Gunshot Location System dates to the 1990s, and police departments in Chicago, Los Angeles, Charleston, S.C., and about a dozen other cities have it or are installing it. D.C. police got the system about two months ago thanks to the FBI, which is footing the bill.

The FBI views Washington as a pilot project; if it is deemed a success, the FBI might provide systems to other areas.

The sensors connect through wireless radio or telephone lines. They are so sensitive that they can distinguish between gunfire and such sounds as firecrackers and car backfires, officials said.

In some neighborhoods, gunfire has become a part of the urban landscape. People don't always call 911; some are uncertain what they heard or unable to say where the sound came from. Sometimes, residents call 911 but police drive around in circles, unable to locate where the shots came from.

Community activist Sandra Seegars, who lives in Southeast, recalled that one night she heard shots in the dark and called police to tell them that the sounds were coming from the east. Police received several similar calls but drove around in vain, looking for the trouble spot.

"Turns out, they were coming from the south," Seegars said. The next morning, schoolchildren found a body between buildings.

The system is running in the 7th Police District in Southeast, which had the highest number of homicides in the city last year; so far this year, 37 people have been killed there. The 7th District includes such places as Anacostia, Barry Farm and Congress Heights, where residents have been clamoring for more police attention for years.

"If it works there, it'll work anywhere in the city -- there's hills, valleys and other challenges in terms of geography," Ramsey said. "I'd like to see it all over the city."

ShotSpotter systems are new to the District but have been used in other cities to track and monitor gunfire. Sensors, about the size of coffee cans, detect the sound of gunfire within two miles. The system pinpoints the location of gunfire.

It determines whether the shooter is moving and calculates the direction and speed of travel.

Audio is immediately and permanently archived for forensic analysis or court proceedings.

Software distinguishes gunfire from such noises as car backfires so police don't respond to false alarms.

Cmdr. Joel Maupin, who heads the 7th District, said officers get reports of gunfire about four days a week, sometimes several times a day. Capt. Victor Brito, who is in charge of ShotSpotter for the department, said he thinks that officers are responding to gunshots more often than before ShotSpotter was installed.

Police were on the scene within minutes of Villatoro's shooting Monday morning. The 35-year-old landscaper was working at an apartment complex when a man suddenly blasted four bullets into him. Villatoro fell, his grass cutter still humming as he lay on the concrete. When the shots were fired, there were no police officers in the immediate area. ShotSpotter alerted police before anyone called 911.

Scott D'Angelo, who lives half a block away, said he heard the gunshots that morning but did not call police. He said that the sound is frequent in his Anacostia community and that he does not call 911 every time he hears the familiar pop.

"Many times a week, you hear gunshots," D'Angelo said. "You hear them from a distance. You hear them from close up. You hear them all over."

ShotSpotter also led police to the shootings of Andre Pee, 14, and Curtis Watkins, 32, killed just before midnight Sept. 25 on a dead-end street in Congress Park. In another incident, the sensors led to the arrest of a man firing a weapon.

Ramsey said he warns his officers to be extra cautious when they respond to a call from ShotSpotter. "They get there faster than usual," Ramsey said. "The offender might still be on the scene."

Executives at ShotSpotter are talking to city and county officials in Maryland and Virginia, but no local jurisdictions have purchased the technology. The company has been in contact with Prince George's County, executives say, because sensors in the District occasionally pick up gunfire across the border.

Police and FBI agents are hesitant to talk about expanding ShotSpotter in the city. Technicians installing ShotSpotter in Los Angeles and Oakland were shot at by gang members, said Gregg Rowland, the company's senior vice president.

"If we say where they are, people would try to destroy them," Rowland said.

Ron Chavarro, supervisory special agent with the FBI's violent crimes squad, said he wanted to bring the technology to Washington after using it to investigate random highway shootings in the Columbus, Ohio, area in late 2003 and early 2004. The attacks left one person dead and ended with the conviction of a suspect.

The FBI would not specify how much the network costs but put it in the range of "hundreds of thousands," Chavarro said. If the entire city of Washington is wired, the cost could go into the millions, according to ShotSpotter officials.

ShotSpotter Inc., based in Santa Clara, Calif., sells gunshot tracking devices to police departments, homeland security agencies and the military. Products include hand-held sensors that soldiers can wear on their uniforms or mount on their vehicles.

The technology was developed in 1994, when a scientist took acoustic software designed to monitor earthquakes and used it to detect urban gunfire. A year later, it was used in Redwood City, Calif., a town that had problems with people firing guns in the air to celebrate such events as New Year's Eve. The technology has since been refined, updated and marketed.

In Rochester, N.Y., officials attribute six arrests since July to the use of ShotSpotter.

In the District, Maupin said he has high hopes ShotSpotter will make criminals think twice before opening fire in his Southeast communities.

"Some days, you get gunshots back to back to back to back," he said
 
Hmm. IIRC, in the PC game "Deus Ex," when the cops installed acoustic gunshot sensors in Hong Kong to stop the triads, the triads started to use these:

sword4_group.jpg

In D.C. (where guns are banned, obviously), I'm guessing people won't even try holding other people up at gunpoint for drugs or money. They'll just walk by and stab the person in passing with a shiv, and then take what they want. Great. :banghead:
 
Aren't guns illegal in DC? Sounds like a waste of money to me, putting in something to detect things that aren't there. :rolleyes:
 
IMO, the weakness with the acoustic gunshot sensors deployed in D.C. is that the DC Metro police dept. is on the other end of them.

(D.C. Metro, NOT to be confused with the U.S. Capitol police, or other [usualy Federal] LEA's that have various duties in the nation's Capital…)
 
I'm kind of amazed at the technology in these things, if they do indeed work as advertised. Pinpoint within feet, and can determine movement and direction? Pretty cool.
 
I wonder what bottle rockets and firecrackers would do to the system?
Heh heh...

Biker
 
Nothing, apparently, it can differentiate between gunshot accoustical signatures and other loud bangs, backfires, etc.
 
Question - Have these magic sensors prevented any crimes? Virtually no chance of that just by the nature of their design.

Question - Has implementing these sensors been correlated with a reduced number of violent criminal acts utilizing firearms?

Question - Has any crime been solved using these sensors?

Question - Why do people prefer the illusion of security over the reality of freedom?
 
Carpediem, I don't think the devices are meant to stop a crime Minority Report style, but rather to get Police on the scene as soon as possible.

The article does say that they got there in time to arrest someone who shot a lanscaping guy to death. That's a Good Thing, at least in my book.

These things seem to me to be just tools. They don't restrict "freedom", in an urban setting you don't go plinking outdoors- if you fire, generally you want the cops there one way or the other- to improve the chances of catching a murderer, or to have them take your statement and clean up the body of the would-be murderer. ;)

As someone who is solidly pro gun, pro freedom, and anti statist, I still don't see why these things aren't a good idea.... in the right place.
 
I've got an idea! Let's set up a system where, when a citizen becomes aware of a crime, they call the police and report it. Oh wait, that doesn't work - see Warren v. District of Columbia.:barf:

From the article:
The system isn't a panacea: It won't prevent shootings and relies on police having the personnel and wherewithal to quickly react.
Shoulda known there was a catch.

But it has the potential to make an impact.
So does crossing your fingers when you see a hoodlum.:rolleyes:

the sensors, roughly the size of coffee cans, have been hidden
"That coffee can in the back seat, Officer? It's a gunshot sensor.":evil:
 
How about hanging the bodies of the thugs who fire the guns from lamp posts? I think that might be a little more effective.
 
Some good points. Guess I'll reconsider some of my statements.

My real concern is incrementalism. Okay, we solved some crimes w/ gunshot sensors. Now let's install CCTV on every street corner. Now let's put cameras in every public space - after all, the good people have nothing to hide and it helps fight crime. Maybe I'm too cynical.

Personally, I feel that the money would be put to better use hiring more police.

TEHO, YMMV, etc.
 
Jamz...

I'd bet big jack that the sensors can't tell the difference between an M-80 and a 380. No way...

Biker
 
Just a matter of time

Until somebody comes up with a "white noise" generator or some such to mask out the sounds. Oh, wait, for guns, isn't that called a silencer? Or a knife?

Anyway, these things don't sound like a bad idea, of course, anything can (and will) be abused. Someday we may have mics, and cameras, along with the software to "discriminate", so everything can be watched and listened to. For the children.

I am unlikely to live that long, and that is not an alltogether unpleasant thought.
 
I personally feel this another "feel good band-aid" solution.

Sad some folks fall for treating the symptons , instead of the disease. The disease being, criminals have free reign while law abiding folks are restricted and denied rights.

No matter how high tech we get, low tech is still going to be around, be effective and work.

Alarm Systems. Pretty high tech, have improved over the years. Deters some would be thieves, biggest thing is satisfy insurance companies and lessen rates for the home/business owner.

I know all about Alarms. BGs would toss a rock thru windows in various areas of town.
This raised a red flag with me, and others. WE knew what was going to happen. Not "if" but "when".
Casing the business and police response times, is what was going on. It was the smart BGs that waited under a T'Storm hit, these set alarms off as well.

Toss a brick thru a business, across town, drive a wrecker thru my front glass front and haul the small safe - snatch and grab, best guess, less than 5 minutes.

Low tech remember? Well case the business , business owner, check out alarm systems, try the busting of glass across town, and -darn, these police on the ball.

No big deal, just kidnap the business owner, his wife, his kid coming home from school. With a gun at his head/ family hostage, that safe will be opened, and no alarms will go off.

I know this all too well.

So how many gun shots did you hear at New Year's Eve and 4th of July masked by fireworks?

All the BGs in DC already know to do fireworks, maybe a toss brick to set off alarms on part of town , and commit the crime they want to on the other part of town.

DC get Federal Dollars to do this I wonder? I bet they did. ;)
 
jamz said:
The article does say that they got there in time to arrest someone who shot a lanscaping guy to death. That's a Good Thing, at least in my book.

A good thing would be if the landscaper pulled out his own gun and put up a fight, possibly saving his life. Please note that he's dead with or without the sensor.
 
Nothing, apparently, it can differentiate between gunshot accoustical signatures and other loud bangs, backfires, etc.

right...I'll bet the waveform of a .380, like someone suggested, never gets altered as it bounces around off of the sides of buildings and the occasional tree.
 
Axman said:
A good thing would be if the landscaper pulled out his own gun and put up a fight, possibly saving his life. Please note that he's dead with or without the sensor.

Well of course that goes without saying, but how does that make these implements bad? Note that the perp was caught due to timely police intervention. Would that have happened if there was someone around to dial 911?

I liken these devices to police radios. Just another tool, not an end all solution, not a solution to the root cause, just a tool to help cops do their job and catch bad guys (or come onto the site of a legitimate SD shooting).

Biker: I am skeptical about anything I read in the MSN, and the Washington Post triply so, so all my comments have the rider "If it performs as they advertise". However, further research on these things tells me that they were originally designed to locate snipers positions. I bet that they've figured out how to screen out false positives from fireworks. I'm no physicist, but I think that accoustical sugnatures are pretty unique and also are easily deciphered by a computer. Remember, the range of sound is way way way beyond what the human ear can hear, so something that sounds idential to a person can be vastly different to a sensor.

from http://www.gsnmagazine.com/jan_05/acoustic_system.html

How Well it Works
In laboratory tests, at near 0 dB Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), the SENTRI system correctly recognized and identified the sound signatures 83 percent of the time. In field tests, the SENTRI identified gunshots at a distance of 300 meters -- and masked by a forest of trees -- 93 percent of the time.


Also,

The system has been tested in Chicago with a variety of sounds – ranging from giant firecrackers and dynamite sticks to breaking glass – to ensure that nothing except a gunshot will trigger the alarm system.

Also

As a testament to the success of this technology, the U.S. Army and U.S. Navy have contracted, separately, with Safety Dynamics to expand the library of sounds, fuse the smart sensors with olfactory, video, and motion/seismic detectors, and miniaturize the platform to less than $200 per unit per sound. Upon completion, the Army and Navy plan to deploy the technology to provide better intelligence and protection for our troops overseas and to extend the perimeter around key facilities and other critical assets.


Are federal dollars going to be purchasing this? You bet.

Bottom line is this is a tool for bringing the police to the scene of a shooting more quickly, functions similar to a radio, a cell phone, a squad car, or a 911 system. In the city, this is a good thing.

It also bothers me to see on all the gun boards I'm on, what seems to be knee-jerk reactions to things. I'd like to believe that my fellow gunnies do more thinking than that, and not resort to knee-jerk postings and beliefs that we so often ascribe to DU types.
 
With the current state of digital signal processing it is certainly possible to differentiate between gunshots and other similar sounds. Though it sounds the same to you, there are differences you can not detect with the human ear.

For instance breaking glass is breaking glass, or so it seems. But acoustic glass break sensors are selected according to the signature frequencies for each type of glass they're protecting to help prevent false alarms. The alarm sensors listen for a specific sound signature. Tempered glass will produce a different frequency signature when breaking, compared to standard plate or a laminated glass, though it all sounds the same to the human ear.

Even though a sound may change pitch or amplitude due to reflections and echos the baseline "pattern" remains the same and is recognizable by electronic sampling and pattern matching.

If it is possible to determine what type of glass was broken, or the identity of a specific submarine out of a fleet of many identical ones, I don't see where there would be any problem differentiating between a gunshot and a firecracker or car backfiring.
 
IRC, this technology has been used in OIF and elsewhere to locate snipers, mortars, etc that insurgents have used. Like all military tech, it'll work for a while until the BG's adapt their tactics or learn to be more agile (shoot & scoot).

Clearly, alot depends on the ability/agility of those trying to stop the BG's to respond and arrive in time. In the case of the DCMPD, I know how I'd bet:rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top