H.R. 203: Domestic Violence Victim Protection Act

Status
Not open for further replies.

jpk1md

Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2007
Messages
620
H.R. 203: Domestic Violence Victim Protection Act

To amend Federal crime grant programs relating to domestic violence to encourage States and localities to implement gun confiscation policies, reform stalking laws, create integrated domestic violence courts, and hire additional personnel for entering protection orders, and for other purposes.

Introduced: Jan 4, 2007
Sponsor:
Rep. Steven Rothman [D-NJ](no cosponsors)
Cosponsors
Cosponsorship information sometimes is out of date.
Last Action: Jan 4, 2007: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

110th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 203

To amend Federal crime grant programs relating to domestic violence to encourage States and localities to implement gun confiscation policies, reform stalking laws, create integrated domestic violence courts, and hire additional personnel for entering protection orders, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 4, 2007

Mr. ROTHMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend Federal crime grant programs relating to domestic violence to encourage States and localities to implement gun confiscation policies, reform stalking laws, create integrated domestic violence courts, and hire additional personnel for entering protection orders, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Domestic Violence Victim Protection Act'.

SEC. 2. ENCOURAGEMENT OF GUN CONFISCATION POLICIES IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES.

Section 2101(c) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796hh(c)) is amended--

(1) by striking `and' at the end of paragraph (4);

(2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (5)(B) and inserting `; and'; and

(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

`(6) certify that their laws or official policies--

`(A) provide that a law enforcement officer who has probable cause that an act of domestic violence has been committed may--

`(i) question persons present to determine whether there are weapons on the premises; and

`(ii) upon observing or learning that a weapon is present on the premises, seize any weapon that the officer reasonably believes would expose the victim or any other household member to a risk of serious bodily injury; and

`(B) provide that a court, as part of the relief provided in a protection order--

`(i) may order that the defendant is prohibited from possessing any firearm or other weapon; and

`(ii) may order that any location may be searched for such a weapon, and such weapon may be seized, if the court has reasonable cause to believe that a firearm or other weapon of the defendant is at that location.'.

SEC. 3. ELIMINATION OF SPECIFIC INTENT TO CAUSE FEAR FROM THE ELEMENTS OF THE OFFENSE OF STALKING.

Section 40602 of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 14031) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

`(c) Elements of Stalking Offense- To be eligible to receive a grant under subsection (a), a State or unit of local government shall, in addition to the requirements of subsection (b), certify that its laws or official policies relating to the offense of stalking require, as elements of the offense, not more than the following: that the defendant has on more than one occasion harassed or threatened the victim.'.

SEC. 4. ENCOURAGEMENT OF INTEGRATED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COURTS.

Section 40412 of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 13992) is amended--

(1) by inserting `(a) In General- ' at the beginning; and

(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:

`(b) Integrated Domestic Violence Courts- Training provided pursuant to grants made under this subtitle may include training in the context of establishing and maintaining courts that provide, wherever practicable, for domestic matters (whether civil or criminal) that arise out of the same family or domestic circumstance to be assigned to a judicial unit for the processing of those matters on a coordinated basis.'.

SEC. 5. HIRING AND MAINTAINING OF ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL FOR ENTERING PROTECTION ORDERS.

(a) Grants to Encourage Arrest Policies- Paragraph (12) of section 2101(b) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796hh(b)(12)) is amended by inserting `, and to hire and maintain additional personnel for entering information relating to protection orders' before the period.

(b) Grants Relating to Stalking and Domestic Violence- Section 40602 of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 14031) is amended by striking the period at the end of subsection (a) and inserting the following: `, which may include hiring and maintaining additional personnel for entering such data.'.
 
Most if not all states have a domestic violence law on the books already that meets or exceeds the new one he is proposing? I don't see what is so "new"?
 
Here in CA, you don't even need to hit your wife. If she gets a restraining order on your, you lose your rights to your guns. And yes, she does know that she holds a sword over my head ;)
 
The moral of the story is to not get married, and to not live together with a female. :neener:
 
Had my x-wife in Nj call cops and said I tried to kill her she was hundreds of miles away and the cops new it. :confused:
They jumped me like I was a thug while painting my house, ransacked my house completely. Even went to the hotel I was renting while renovating the house and even after throwing me in Jail and I paid bail wouldn't let me go, new every gun I bought in my life and demanded that I give up the names of every person I sold guns to or I would stay in Jail. :cuss:
well after sitting handcuffed to a chair thru the night, luckally an officer recognized me and new where they where legally or I would still be sitting there.
The only thing they got was my FID card, and it took me $3,500.00 and three trips to court to prove I wasn't near her and get my card back. Even after the Judge said give him his card back the DV sargent refused I had to go back in and the Judge ordered the sheriff to return the paperwork so I could go get the card in the evidence building. Like I said I had just moved so when I went to get the card it had a different address on it and they harrased me about that. I had to go get paperwork showing I just moved.
NJ just sucked!!!!!:banghead:
 
DV laws apply to same sex relationships as well. And we males can be just as irrational and vindictive as the "fairer sex" is.

Moral of the story? Live with just yourself and a house full of cats.

Hehe what I meant was your girlfriend lives in another house and you live in another. Not same sex relationships. Without cohabituation, think most DV laws won't apply.
 
I've been told in this state DV laws apply: to anyone sharing your residence, to anyone you are "involved with", to anyone you used to be "involved with". My arresting officer said that.

A big HELL NO! on this law as they could lawfully take your guns the moment someone accuses you of a non-firearm related DV charge. As the law here stands now, when accused of DV YOU can't have your firearms, but the LEOs don't get them either (unless they were part of the crime). You simply must keep them "outta your ability to get them", say at a family members house instead of your own.
 
Does anyone here see this as a complete and total usurpation of Federal power that is not enumerated in the Constitution??? Tell me, where in Article 1, Section 8, does it say that the feds get to write criminal law FOR the states? This is a state matter, NOT for the feds. It's a whole lot easier to fight this state by state than it is to fight the feds on it.
 
This part is rather frightening:

SEC. 3. ELIMINATION OF SPECIFIC INTENT TO CAUSE FEAR FROM THE ELEMENTS OF THE OFFENSE OF STALKING.


Now simply asking a woman out could be twisted into "stalking".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top