Jim Watson
Member
When I see Uppercut (and Punch) readily available, I will put some over my Garmin, along with Minimag and Velocitor. I have a S&W Compact 3.6" for representative Mean Street performance.
There's a limiting factor there. I recall that .22's (probably 40gr standard) start losing velocity in barrels over 18." Reckoning as they do for big shipboard naval rifles, as length ÷ diameter, that would be about 80 "caliber." A long ride for the pressure to keep giving increased velocity, but with that quoted velocity out of a shortie barrel, it might get you a boost out of a long barrel. But it makes me wonder about the mechanical parts in a blowback semiauto.They are advertised at 950 fps from a 4-inch or shorter barrel. Wonder what that would be from a 16 or even 20 inch barrel?
Except ignite more regularly and hit closer to point of aim in my experience.But I don’t think a mini mag does anything a Federal value pack wouldn't do either.
I guess I am at the wrong forum for this one. Rimfirecenteral is probably a better audience for this one. If I see a box of these at the local Academy I will definitely be picking up a box or two and try them out on some limb-rats and up-armored-opossum. I am a sucker for "premium" 22LR. Killed a lot of ground hogs with Stingers and a few with Velocitors before I moved to the south.
I can’t imagine it would work any better on .22 class of game. I’ve killed a coyote with a .22 LR but it was close and perfect broadside on its noggin
I'm just going to stick with a winner I've been shooting since the mid 80s.
CCI Stingers worked just fine then, have worked just fine for 40 yrs. No point in changing.
Maybe a little, but not much. Certainly not enough to matter to the average user, at least the ones I know.Except ignite more regularly and hit closer to point of aim in my experience.
IF your bbls are so rough that you will need to scrub out copper at those velocities, then you are already scrubbing out plenty of lead!!I am also not thrilled with the thought of scrubbing out copper fouling in a rimfire barrels. I suppose I could wax lube it myself, but why wouldn’t we want a jacketed .22 also lubricated? It’s only going through 2-4” of barrel right?
I know nothing about Armadillos. I'm curious as to how they kill livestock?Night hunters and poachers can.
I’d probably keep some on hand for armadillos. I hate armadillos, they kill cows and cost me money.
Among other ways, yes.I know nothing about Armadillos. I'm curious as to how they kill livestock?
Do they burrow and leave big holes the cattle step into, breaking legs?
Copper is a self lubricating metal and as a bullet jacket does not need lubrication to work will. Yes it can benefit from lubrication but does very well without it as proven by most modern center fire ammunition. The idea here is in a small pocket 22 LR used for self defense, the bullet lubrication used by most 22LR ammunition has some serious down sides attracting dirt, pocket lint, and similar that would compromise function. A copper jacket removes the requirement for this sticky lubrication reducing this risk.I’m not sure if copper cares how fast the friction happens.
Moreover, much of it is vapor deposited by the heat and pressure of combustion, settling on even a mirror smooth surface.
I also realize I am conflating defensive pistol and likely much higher round count rifle barrels, yet still my question remains, despite the finish of my bores…
My copper-washed, copper-plated, and brass-plated rimfire ammunition still carries a wax lube. Why would a relatively tougher jacket, pressing even more firmly on the bore, not benefit from wax lube during its ride down the pipe?
I often lubricate my centerfire jacketed ammunition and find lessened fouling in the bores, pistols and rifles alike.
A question perhaps not directly related to the topic, but brought up by the conversation, none the less. Like others, I find this ammunition offering interesting, just not for Self-Defense.
Aha! See? I knew there was something I was missing.The idea here is in a small pocket 22 LR used for self defense, the bullet lubrication used by most 22LR ammunition has some serious down sides attracting dirt, pocket lint, and similar that would compromise function. As copper jacket remove the requirement for this sticky lubrication reducing this risk.
Assuming a .084 G1 BC similar to that reported for the Stinger that would have the impact velocity at 100yds from a rifle at roughly the same as point blank from the 4-in barrel which on varmints at 100 yards, give or take a a dozen or two, you could expect those lovely controlled non-fragmenting expansion we see in the close range pistol testing. It would also only have a hair over a 4-inch drop at 100 from a 50 yard zero. Seems like good late season limb-rat medicine to me if it groups well in my rifle.Finally found a video test from both a 4 inch barreled semi auto pistol and an 18 inch rifle.
32gr JHP
980 fps from 4" barrel
1400 fps from 18" barrel
.My first impression is ".22 Stinger with a jacketed bullet rather than copper plated lead bullet." If I every day carried a .22 for defense, I would expect jacketed bullets would stand up to daily handling better than copper plated lead